DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Biolistic transformation of Moroccan durum wheat varieties by using mature embryo-derived calli

  • Senhaji, Chaimae (Biotechnology Research Unit, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)) ;
  • Gaboun, Fatima (Biotechnology Research Unit, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)) ;
  • Abdelwahd, Rabha (Biotechnology Research Unit, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)) ;
  • Diria, Ghizlane (Biotechnology Research Unit, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)) ;
  • Udupa, Sripada (ICARDA–INRA Cooperative Research Project, International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas) ;
  • Douira, Allal (Laboratory of Botany, Biotechnology and Plant Protection, Faculty of Sciences-University Ibn Tofail, University campus) ;
  • Iraqi, Driss (Biotechnology Research Unit, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA))
  • Received : 2021.11.20
  • Accepted : 2021.12.23
  • Published : 2021.12.31

Abstract

Environmental stresses are estimated to have reduced global crop yields of wheat by 5.5%. However, traditional approaches for the transfer of resistance to these stresses in wheat plants have yielded limited results. In this regard, genetic transformation has undoubtedly opened up new avenues to overcome crop losses due to various abiotic stresses. Particle bombardment has been successfully employed for obtaining transgenic wheat. However, most of these procedures employ immature embryos, which are not available throughout the year. Therefore, the present investigation utilized mature seeds as the starting material and used the calli raised from three Moroccan durum wheat varieties as the target tissue for genetic transformation by the biolistic approach. The pANIC-5E plasmid containing the SINA gene for drought and salinity tolerance was used for genetic transformation. To enhance the regeneration capacity and transformation efficiency of the tested genotypes, the study compared the effect of copper supplementation in the induction medium (up to 5 μM) with the standard MS medium. The results show that the genotypes displayed different sensitivities to CuSO4, indicating that the transformation efficiency was highly genotype-dependent. The integration of transgenes in the T0 transformants was demonstrated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of the obtained resistant plantlets with primers specific to the SINA gene. Among the three genotypes studied, 'Isly' showed the highest efficiency of 9.75%, followed by 'Amria' with 1.25% and 'Chaoui' with 1%.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) for generous funding.

References

  1. Allison H, Feng X, Fry JE, Hu T, Lu F, Radionenko M (2002) Efficiency agrobacterium-mediated wheat transformation method
  2. Cai L, Sun DF, Sun GL (2014) Optimization of a biolistic transformation system for transfer of antifreeze gene KN2 and the bar herbicide resistance gene in common wheat. Genet Mol Res 13(2):3474-3485 https://doi.org/10.4238/2014.April.30.8
  3. Cho MJ Jiang W, Lemaux PG (1998) Transformation of recalcitrant barley cultivars through improvement of regenerability and decreased albinism. Plant Sci 138(2):229-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00162-9
  4. Dahleen LS (1995) Improved plant regeneration from barley cultures by increased copper levels. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 43:267-269 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00039954
  5. Ekom D, Udupa SM, Benchekroun MN, Ennaji MM, Abdelwahd R, Iraqi D (2014) Immature Embryo-Derived of Two Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Varieties Transformation Using Particle Bombardment Method. Annu. Res. Rev. Biol 4:39043914
  6. Frona D, Szenderak J, Harangi-Rakos M (2019) The Challenge of Feeding the World Sustainability 11(20):5816 https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205816
  7. Galovic V, Rausch T, Grsic-Rausch S (2010) Mature embryoderived wheat transformation with major stress-modulated antioxidant target gene. Arch Biological Sci 62:539-546 https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS1003539G
  8. Ghaemi, M, Sarrafi A, Alibert, G (1994) The effects of silver nitrate, colchicines, cupric sulphate and genotype on the production of embryoids from anthers of tetraploid wheat (Triticum turgidum). Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 36:355-359 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046093
  9. Greer MS, Kovalchuk I, Eudes F (2009) Ammonium nitrate improves direct somatic embryogenesis and biolistic transformation of Triticum aestivum. New Biotechnol 26:44-52 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2009.02.003
  10. Hardwood WA (2012) Advances and remaining challenges in the transformation of barley and wheat. J. Exp. Bot 63:1791-1798 https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err380
  11. He S, Deng-tang Z (2014) Effects of CuSO4 and Uniconazole on Mature Embryo Culture in Japonica Rice, J. Northeast Agric. Univ (English Edition) 21(2):12-18 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-8104(14)60029-5
  12. Iraqi D, Hakam N, Labhilili M (2005) Transformation genetique des embryons immatures du ble tendre (Triticum aestivum) et du ble dur (Triticum durum). Al Awamia Moroccan Journal of Agricultural Research 115:3-16 (in French with an abstract in English)
  13. Iser M, Fettig S, Scheyhing F, Viertel K, Hess D (1999) Genotypedependent stable genetic transformation in german spring wheat varieties selected for high regeneration potential. J Plant Physiol 154:509-516 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(99)80291-0
  14. Ishida Y, Saito H, Hiei Y, Komari T (2003) Improved protocol for transformation of maize (Zea mays L.) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Biotech 20:57-66 https://doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology.20.57
  15. Kasirajan L, Boomiraj K, Bansal KC (2013) Optimization of genetic transformation protocol mediated by biolistic method in some elite genotypes of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Afr j biotechnol 12(6):531-538
  16. Khurana-Kaul V, Kachhwaha S, Kothari SL (2010) Direct shoot regeneration from leaf explants of Jatropha curcas in response to thidiazuron and high copper contents in the medium. Biol Plant 54(2):369-372 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-010-0066-3
  17. Kumar R, Mamrutha HM, Kaur A et al (2017) Development of an efficient and reproducible regeneration system in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Physiol Mol Biol Plants 23:945-954 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-017-0463-6
  18. le Roux ML, Botha AM, van der Vyver C (2016) Somatic embryogenesis and cryopreservation of South African bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. S Afr J Bot 106:78-88 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2016.05.018
  19. Lidon FC, Barreiro MG, Henriques FS (1995) Interactions between biomass production and ethylene biosynthesis in copper treated rice. J. Plant Nut 18:1301-1314 https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169509364981
  20. Lolkema PC (1985) Copper resistance in higher plants. Ph.D. Thesis, Free University Press.
  21. Maddock SE (1985) Cell culture, somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in wheat, barley, oats, rye and triticale. In: Cereal Tissue and Cell Culture Edited by: Bright SWJ, Jones MGK. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 131-174
  22. Makowska K, Oleszczuk S, Zimny J (2017) The effect of copper on plant regeneration in barley microspore culture. Czech J Genet Plant Breed 53:17-22 https://doi.org/10.17221/82/2016-CJGPB
  23. Miroshnichenko DN, Poroshin GN, Dolgov SV (2011) Genetic transformation of wheat using mature seed tissues. Appl Biochem Micro 47:767-775 https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683811080096
  24. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco. Tissue Cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473497
  25. Ozgens M, Turet M, Ozcan S, Sanzak C (1996) Callus induction and plant regeneration from immature and mature embryos of winter durum wheat genotypes. Plant Breed 115:455-458 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1996.tb00956.x
  26. Ozias-Akins P, Vasil IK (1983) Callus induction and growth from the mature embryos. Protoplasma 115:104-113 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01279802
  27. Parmar SS, Sainger M, Chaudhary D, Jaiwal PK (2012) Plant regeneration from mature embryo of commercial Indian bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 18:177-183 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-012-0101-2
  28. Pastori GM, Wilkinson MD, Steele SH, Sparks CA, Jones HD, Parry MAJ (2001) Age dependent transformation frequency in elite wheat varieties. J Exp Bot 52:857-863 https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/52.357.857
  29. Patnaik D, Khurana P (2003) Genetic Transformation of Indian Bread (T. aestivum) and Pasta (T. durum) Wheat by Particle Bombardment of Mature Embryo-Derived Calli. BMC Plant Biol 3:1-11 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-3-1
  30. Pellegrineschi A, Noguera LM, Skovmand B, Brito RM, Velazquez L, Salgado MM, Hernandez R, Warburton M, Hoisington D (2002) Identification of highly transformable wheat genotypes for mass production of fertile transgenic plants. Genome 45:421-430 https://doi.org/10.1139/g01-154
  31. Pukhalskii VA, Smirnov SP, Korostyleva TV et al (1996) Genetic Transformation of Wheat Triticum aestivum L. via Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Russ J Genet 32:1202-1206
  32. Purnhauser L, Gyulai G (1993) Effect of copper on shoot and root regeneration in wheat, triticale, rape and tobacco tissue cultures. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 35:131-139 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032962
  33. Purnhauser L (1991) Stimulation of shoot and root regeneration in wheat (Triticum aestivum) callus cultures by copper. Cereal Res Commun 19:419-423
  34. Qin JB, Wang Y, Zhu CQ (2014) Biolistic transformation of wheat using the HMW-GS 1Dx5 gene without selectable markers. Genet Mol Res 13(2):4361-4371 https://doi.org/10.4238/2014.June.10.3
  35. Rasco-Gaunt S, Liu D, Li CP, Doherty A, Hagemann K, Riley A, Thompson T, Brunkun C, Mitchell M, Lowe K, Krebbers E, Lazzeri P, Jayne S, Rice D (2003) Characterization of the expression of a novel constitutive maize promoter in transgenic wheat and maize. Plant Cell Rep 21:569-576 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-002-0552-y
  36. Rasco-Gaunt S, Riley A, Cannell M, Barcelo P, Lazzeri PA (2001) Procedures allowing the transformation of a range of european elite wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties via particle bombardment. J Exp Bot 52:865-874 https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/52.357.865
  37. Redha A, Talaat A (2008) Improvement of green plant regeneration by manipulation of anther culture induction medium of hexaploid wheat. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 92:141-146 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-007-9315-3
  38. Sahrawat AK, Chand S (1999) Stimulatory effect of copper on plant regeneration in indica rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Plant Physiol 154(4):517-522 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(99)80292-2
  39. Shewry PR, Jones HD (2005) Transgenic wheat: where do we stand after the first 12 years? Ann Appl Biol 147:1-14 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2005.00009.x
  40. Sparks CA, Doherty A, Jones H (2014) Genetic transformation of wheat via Agrobacterium-mediated DNA delivery. In: Henry RJ, Furtado A (eds) Cereal genomics: methods and protocols. Series Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1099. Springer, New York, pp 235-250
  41. Tahiliani S, Kothari SL (2004) Increased copper content of the medium improves plant regeneration from immature embryo derived callus of wheat (Triticum aestivum). J Plant Biochem Biotech 13:85-88 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03263199
  42. Tao LL, Yin GX, Du LP, Shi ZY (2011) Improvement of plant regeneration from immature embryos of wheat infected by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Agr Sci China 10:317-326 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1671-2927(11)60010-2
  43. Udupa SM, Weigand F, Saxena MC, Kahl G (1998) Genotyping with RAPD and microsatellite makers resolves pathotype diversity in the ascochyta blight pathogen of chickpea. Theor Appl Genet 97:299-307 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050899
  44. Vasil IK (2005) The story of transgenic cereals: the challenge, the debate, and the solution a historical perspective. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 41:577-583 https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2005654
  45. Vendruscolo ECG, Schuster I, Negra ES, Scapim C (2008) Callus induction and plant regeneration by Brazilian new elite wheat genotypes. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol 8:195-201 https://doi.org/10.12702/1984-7033.v08n03a03
  46. Vendruscolo ECG, Schuster I, Pileggi M, Scapim CA, Molinari HBC, Marur CJ, Vieira LGE (2007) Stress-induced synthesis of proline confers tolerance to water deficit in transgenic wheat. J Plant Physiol 164:1367-1376 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2007.05.001
  47. Wojnarowiez G, Jacquard C, Devaux P, Sangwan RS, Clement C (2002) Influence of copper sulfate on anther culture in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Sci 162:843-847 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00036-5
  48. Wu H, Sparks C, Amoah B et al (2003) Factors Influencing Successful Agrobacterium-Mediated Genetic Transformation of Wheat. Plant Cell Rep 21:659-668 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-002-0564-7
  49. Xia L, Ma Y, He Y, Jones HD (2012) GM wheat development in China: current status and challenges to commercialization. J Exp Bot 63(5):1785-1790 https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err342
  50. Xiao-Min B, Li-Pu D, Hui-Jun X, Xing-Guo X (2011) Effects of CuSO4 and Iron Source on the Tissue Culture of Wheat. J Plant Genet Resour 12(6):975-981
  51. Ye XG, Xu HJ, Du LP, Xin ZY (2001) Study on the factors influencing the efficiency of wheat transformation. Sci Agri Sinica 34:128-132
  52. Ziolkowski MJ (2007) Advancements in biolistics and applications for agriculturally significant crops. Microbiol. Mol. Genet 3:34-39