Safety and Health at Work

Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (산업안전보건연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Defining a "Safe System of Work"

  • Caponecchia, C. (School of Aviation, The University of New South Wales) ;
  • Wyatt, A. (Wyatt Consultants Pty Ltd)
  • Received : 2020.06.04
  • Accepted : 2021.07.01
  • Published : 2021.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Providing a "safe system of work" is the essence of the general duties that employers have to their employees under workplace health and safety regulations. Despite this, consistent and appropriate definition of what constitutes a safe system of work is almost non-existent. Available definitions tend to confuse a safe system of work with management practices intended to bring about a safe system, or conflate the broad system suggested in general duties clauses with procedures or work methods that are focused on particular hazards or tasks. This article develops a definition of safe systems of work which recognises the broad scope of the concept and includes psychological health and return to work processes. This definition can be used by a range of stakeholders to better communicate the scope of occupational health and safety duties and more consistently assess whether a safe system has been provided both before and after incidents occur.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to acknowledge the contribution of several colleagues who have provided background information for this paper.

References

  1. Occupational Safety and Health Council Hong Kong. Occupational Safety and Health Ordinance (CAP 509) and subsidiary regulations [Available from: http://www.oshc.org.hk/eng/main/osh_info/osh_legislation_statist/.
  2. UK Health and Safety Executive. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 London: HSE; [Available from: https://www.hse.gov.uk/legislation/hswa.htm..
  3. Safe Work Australia. The model WHS laws canberra: safe work Australia; 2019. Available from: https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/law-andregulation.
  4. Workcover Queensland. Employers must provide a safe system of work; 2015. Available from: https://www.worksafe.qld.gov.au/forms-and-resources/casestudies/common-law-claim-case-studies/employers-must-provide-safework-system.
  5. Macdonald W, Oakman J. Requirements for more effective prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2015;16(293).
  6. Safework New South Wales. A safe system of work: it's easier than you thought; 2018. Available from: https://www.safework.nsw.gov.au/adviceand-resources/online-safety-webinars/webinars-accordions-2/a-safe-systemof-work-easier-than-you-thought.
  7. CCH. occupational health and safety glossary. Sydney: CCH Australia Ltd; 1992.
  8. Hong Kong Occupational Safety and Health Branch Labour Department. Safe systems of work; 2004. Available from: https://www.labour.gov.hk/eng/public/os/D/SafeSystem.pd.
  9. University of Western Australia. OSH Legislative hierarchy and component of a safe system of work nd [Available from: www.safety.uwa.edu.au/__.../OSHLegislative-Hierarchy-and-Components-of-a-Safe-.
  10. Yorio PL, Willmer DR, Moore SM. Health and safety management systems through a multilevel strategic management perspective: theoretical and empirical considerations. Safety Science 2015;72:221-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.09.011
  11. Parker SK. Does the evidence and theory support the good work design principles? An educational resource. Canberra: Safe Work Australia; 2015.
  12. Leka S, Jain A, Lerouge L. Work-related psychosocial risks: key definitions and an overview of the policy context in Europe. In: Lerouge L, editor. Psychosocial risks in labour and social security law A comparative legal overview from Europe, North America, Australia and Japan. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 1-12.
  13. Kunyk D, Craig-Broadwith M, Morris H, Diaz R, Reisdorfer E, Wang J. Employers' perceptions and attitude toward the Canadian national standard on psychological health and safety in the workplace: a qualitative study. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 2016;44. 41-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.08.030
  14. Makin AM, Winder C. A new conceptual framework to improve the application of occupational health and safety management systems. Safety Science 2008;46:935-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.11.011
  15. Wyatt M, Lane T. Return to work: a comparison of psychological and physical injury claims. Analysis of the Return to Work Survey results. Canberra: Safe Work Australia; 2018.