DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Debris transport visualization to analyze the flow characteristics in reactor vessel for nuclear power plants

  • Received : 2020.12.21
  • Accepted : 2021.07.04
  • Published : 2021.12.25

Abstract

During the long-term cooling (LTC) phase of a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) in a pressurized water reactor (PWR), water is supplied from the containment sump to the reactor coolant system (RCS) by the flooded sump water to the Reactor Vessel (RV) through the broken pipes. As part of the technical efforts for resolving GSI-191 [( Reid and Crytzer, May. 2007) 1, consideration is needed for the consequences of debris penetrating the sump screen and propagating downstream into the RV. Injection of debris (fiberglass) into the RV during the LTC recirculation phase needs special attention to assure that reactor core cooling is maintained. The point of concern is the potential for debris to adversely affect the reactor core flow paths or heat transfer [2]. However, all the experiments for proving the coolability of RV have been done with the assumption of the most of debris would be transferred to the RV and the bottom nozzle of the FAs. The purpose of the tests is to quantify the amount of the debris that would be accumulated at the lower plenum and the debris that passes through the FAs since non-conservatism of other researches assumptions that have been used in the past experimental or analytical programs.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Development of Debris Transport Visualization in Reactor Vessel Test Facility for Nuclear Power Plants Safety of the Ministry of Science and Information and Communications technology (MSIT) grant funded by the Korea government Ministry of Knowledge Economy (No. 2018M2A8A1084229).

References

  1. Richard D. Reid, Kurtis R. Crytzer, Ann E. Lane, WCAP-16785-NP, Evaluation of Additional Inputs to the WCAP-16530-NP Chemical Model, US-NRC report, May. 2007.
  2. NRC SECY-12-0093, Closure Options for Generic Safety Issue - 191, Assessment of Debris Accumulation on Pressurized-Water Reactor Sump Performance, Accession No. ML121310648, July 9, 2012.
  3. Ann E. Lane, Timothy S. Andreychek, William A. Byer, Richard J. Jacko, Edward J. Lahoda, Richard D. Reid, WCAP-16530-NP, Evaluation of Post-Accident Chemical Effects in Containment Sump Fluids to Support GSI-191, US-NRC Report, March. 2008.
  4. M. Ding, A. Abdel-Fattah, S. Fisher, B.C. Lettelier, K. Howe, J. Garcia, C.J. Shaffer, NUREG/CR-6877, Charaterization and Head-Loss Testing of Latent Debris from Pressurized Water Reactor Containment Buildings, U.S. NRC Office of Regulatory Research, Washington D.C, July. 2005.
  5. NUREG/CR-5809, an Integrated Structure and Scaling Methodology for Severe Accident Analysis, Appendix D, 'A Hierarchical Two-Tiered Scaling Analysis, November 1991.
  6. Crane Handbook, Flow of fluids through Valves, Fittings, and Pipe, 1986.
  7. M. Ishii, I. Kataoka, Scaling laws for thermal-hydraulic system under single phase and two-phase natural circulation, Nucl. Eng. Des. 81 (1984) 411-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(84)90287-5
  8. M. Ishii, et al., The three-level scaling approach with application to the purdue university multi-dimensional integral test assembly (PUMA), Nucl. Eng. Des. 186 (1998) 177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(98)00222-2
  9. W. Wulff, Scaling of thermohydraulic systems, Nucl. Eng. Des. 163 (1996) 359. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(96)01232-0