Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine

The Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine (대한생식의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of embryonic competence and clinical outcomes between early and late cumulus cell removal for in vitro fertilization

  • Received : 2021.03.15
  • Accepted : 2021.05.31
  • Published : 2021.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The impact of early mechanical removal of cumulus cells on fertilization and embryonic development is not yet precisely known. This study aimed to investigate the effects of early and late cumulus cell removal on fertilization, polyspermy, embryonic development potential, blastocyst development, and clinical outcomes. Methods: A prospective study was conducted of patients who underwent in vitro fertilization between September 2019 and October 2020. Sibling oocytes were randomly allocated after insemination to early cumulus cell removal at 6 hours (group I) and late cumulus cell removal at 16-18 hours (group II). If total fertilization failure (TFF) was determined to have occurred at early cumulus cell removal, rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was performed. Fertilization, embryonic development, and pregnancy outcomes were compared. Results: A total of 912 oocytes were assigned to group I (458 oocytes) and group II (454 oocytes). Fertilization, polyspermy, embryo quality, and pregnancy outcomes were not significantly different between both groups. Rescue ICSI enabled fertilization of 79.2% of the TFF oocytes. Conclusion: Early cumulus cell removal at 6 hours had no significant difference in fertilization, polyspermy, embryo development, or obstetric and perinatal outcomes compared to late removal. Early cumulus cell removal combined with early rescue ICSI may have the potential to help couples with TFF.

Keywords

References

  1. Bedaiwy MA, Falcone T, Mohamed MS, Aleem AA, Sharma RK, Worley SE, et al. Differential growth of human embryos in vitro: role of reactive oxygen species. Fertil Steril 2004;82:593-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.02.121
  2. Enkhmaa D, Kasai T, Hoshi K. Long-time exposure of mouse embryos to the sperm produces high levels of reactive oxygen species in culture medium and relates to poor embryo development. Reprod Domest Anim 2009;44:634-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2007.01036.x
  3. Yuzpe AA, Liu Z, Fluker MR. Rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)-salvaging in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles after total or near-total fertilization failure. Fertil Steril 2000;73:1115-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00522-7
  4. Kattera S, Chen C. Short coincubation of gametes in in vitro fertilization improves implantation and pregnancy rates: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril 2003;80:1017-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(03)01154-3
  5. Dirnfeld M, Shiloh H, Bider D, Harari E, Koifman M, Lahav-Baratz S, et al. A prospective randomized controlled study of the effect of short coincubation of gametes during insemination on zona pellucida thickness. Gynecol Endocrinol 2003;17:397-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590312331290288
  6. Chen C, Kattera S. Rescue ICSI of oocytes that failed to extrude the second polar body 6 h post-insemination in conventional IVF. Hum Reprod 2003;18:2118-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg325
  7. Lundqvist M, Johansson U, Lundkvist O, Milton K, Westin C, Simberg N. Reducing the time of co-incubation of gametes in human in-vitro fertilization has no beneficial effects. Reprod Biomed Online 2001;3:21-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61959-1
  8. Barraud-Lange V, Sifer C, Pocate K, Ziyyat A, Martin-Pont B, Porcher R, et al. Short gamete co-incubation during in vitro fertilization decreases the fertilization rate and does not improve embryo quality: a prospective auto controlled study. J Assist Reprod Genet 2008;25:305-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-008-9240-3
  9. Dai SJ, Qiao YH, Jin HX, Xin ZM, Su YC, Sun YP, et al. Effect of coincubation time of sperm-oocytes on fertilization, embryonic development, and subsequent pregnancy outcome. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2012;58:348-53. https://doi.org/10.3109/19396368.2012.708087
  10. Tucker MJ, Liebermann J. Morphological scoring of human embryos and its relevance to blastocyst transfer. In: Patrizio P, Tucker MJ, Guelman V. editors. A color atlas for human assisted reproduction. Philadelphia: Lippincott William & Wilkins; 2003. p. 99-108.
  11. Zhang XD, Liu JX, Liu WW, Gao Y, Han W, Xiong S, et al. Time of insemination culture and outcomes of in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2013;19:685-95. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt036
  12. Liu J, Zhang X, Yang Y, Zhao J, Hao D, Zhang J, et al. Long-time vs. short-time insemination of sibling eggs. Exp Ther Med 2016;12:3756-60. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3827
  13. Guo N, Yang F, Liu Q, Ren X, Zhao H, Li Y, et al. Effects of cumulus cell removal time during in vitro fertilization on embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2016;14:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-016-0151-3
  14. Liu J, Chen M, Lin C, Weng X, Meng Z, Tang W. Effect of early cumulus cell removal on the fertilization and clinical outcome in human in vitro fertilization. Adv Reprod Sci 2015;3:50-6. https://doi.org/10.4236/arsci.2015.33006
  15. Xue Y, Tong X, Jiang L, Zhu H, Yang L, Zhang S. Effect of cumulus cell removal 4 h post-insemination on fertilization and embryo quality: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013;30:1049-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-013-0049-3
  16. Xiong S, Han W, Liu JX, Zhang XD, Liu WW, Liu H, et al. Effects of cumulus cells removal after 6 h co-incubation of gametes on the outcomes of human IVF. J Assist Reprod Genet 2011;28:1205-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-011-9630-9
  17. Nagy ZP, Liu J, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Time-course of oocyte activation, pronucleus formation and cleavage in human oocytes fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1743-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138786
  18. Payne D, Flaherty SP, Barry MF, Matthews CD. Preliminary observations on polar body extrusion and pronuclear formation in human oocytes using time-lapse video cinematography. Hum Reprod 1997;12:532-41. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.3.532
  19. Wang WH, Day BN, Wu GM. How does polyspermy happen in mammalian oocytes? Microsc Res Tech 2003;61:335-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.10346
  20. Li GP, Bunch TD, White KL, Rickords L, Liu Y, Sessions BR. Denuding and centrifugation of maturing bovine oocytes alters oocyte spindle integrity and the ability of cytoplasm to support parthenogenetic and nuclear transfer embryo development. Mol Reprod Dev 2006;73:446-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20436
  21. Kondapalli LA, Perales-Puchalt A. Low birth weight: is it related to assisted reproductive technology or underlying infertility? Fertil Steril 2013;99:303-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.035
  22. Gordon L, Joo JE, Powell JE, Ollikainen M, Novakovic B, Li X, et al. Neonatal DNA methylation profile in human twins is specified by a complex interplay between intrauterine environmental and genetic factors, subject to tissue-specific influence. Genome Res 2012;22:1395-406. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.136598.111