Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Improvement of Korean Defense Specification Classification System through the Domestic and Foreign Standard Classification System Research and Analysis

국내외 표준 분류체계 조사·분석을 통한 국방규격 분류체계 개선방안 연구

  • Received : 2021.02.15
  • Accepted : 2021.04.02
  • Published : 2021.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzed the reality and problems of the defense standard classification system. This paper proposes a plan to perform standard management tasks efficiently through case analysis of domestic and foreign standard classification systems. To continuously solve the problem of military product quality in defense technical data, it is necessary to promptly reflect the civilian's excellent technology and benchmark the civilian standard system to manage high-quality defense standards. First, to analyze the reality, the NATO classification system was analyzed through the private KS of domestic and ICS codes, the US defense standard system of overseas. In the case of the Korean military, the reality of the defense standard classification system was grasped through the National Defense Standards Comprehensive System operated by the Defense Acquisition Program Administration. The classification of the ministry of defense's weapon system and force support system is the most suitable classification system for the Korean military, which is classified into eight weapon systems and six force support standard systems for all steps. Specifically, it was classified into 12 major categories, 66 categories, and 352 sub-categories. In this study, the establishment of the defense standard management system can improve the classification system of new defense standards by reflecting the superior technology of the private sector.

본 연구에서는 국방표준분류체계의 현실태 및 문제점을 분석하고 국내외 표준분류체계 사례 분석을 통해 규격관리 업무를 효율적으로 수행하기 위한 방안을 제안하였다. 국방기술자료의 군수품 품질 문제를 지속적으로 해소하기 위해 민간의 우수 기술을 적시에 반영하고 완성도 높은 국방규격의 관리를 위해 민간의 표준체계를 벤치마킹해야 한다. 먼저, 현실태 분석을 위해 국내 민간 KS 및 국외 ICS코드, 미국 국방표준시스템을 통해 나토 분류체계를 분석하였다. 우리군의 경우는 방위사업청에서 운영 중인 국방표준종합시스템을 통해 국방규격 분류체계의 현실태를 파악하였다. 각 경우를 우리 군의 국방규격 분류체계에 산업표준과 연계해 국방표준분류체계에 적용하였다. 국방부 무기체계/전력지원체계의 분류는 전순기 군수품에 대해 8대 무기체계와 6대 전력지원체계로 분류한 우리 군에 가장 적합한 분류체계이다. 대분류로 국방부 무기체계/전력지원체계의 분류를 채택하였고, 중분류와 소분류로는 나토 분류체계를 채택하였다. 구체적으로 대분류 12개 분야, 중분류 66개 분야, 소분류 352개 분야로 각각 분류하였다. 본 연구에서는 국방표준관리체계 확립으로 민간의 기술반영을 통한 신규 국방규격 분류체계 개선방안으로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. International Organization for Standardization, "ISO/IEC Guide 2 : Standardization and Related Activities - General Vocabulary", 2004.
  2. K. I. Choi, "Survey on the Application of Standards and Specification in Munitions Companies(I)", Journal of Academia-Industrial Technology, Vol.11, No.12, pp.4774-4779, Dec. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2010.11.12.4774
  3. K. I. Choi, I. G. Park, "Survey on the Application of Standards and Specification in Munitions Companies (II)", Journal of Academia-Industrial Technology, Vol.12, No.4, pp.1597-1602, Apr. 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2010.11.12.4774
  4. J. S. Jeong, T. M. Kwon, W. Y. Hwang, "A Study on the Development of the Defense Standardization System", Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, Vol.35, No.3, pp.43-44, Sep. 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2012.40.3.295
  5. S. I. Sung, H. G. Kim, Y. S. Kim, S. J. Bae, J. S. Kim, J. M. Kim, "Development of Priority Calculation Models for Enacting and Revising the Korea Defense Standards and Specifications", Journal of the Korean society for Quality Management, Vol.44, No.1, pp.109-120, Mar. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2012.40.3.295
  6. H. G. Ryu, "A Study on the Improvement Plan of Korean Defense Standardization", Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, Vol.18, No.4, pp.459-468, Aug. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9766/KIMST.2015.18.4.459
  7. Defense Agency for Technology and Quality, "A Study on a Systematic Buildup of Military Specification and Leveling of International Specification", DTAQ Technical report, 2007.
  8. Defense Agency for Technology and Quality, "A Study on the Utilization of Non-military Standards for Updating Korean Defense Specifications(I)", DTAQ Technical report, 2012.
  9. Defense Agency for Technology and Quality, "A Study on the Utilization of Non-military Standards for Updating Korean Defense Specifications(II)", DTAQ Technical report, 2012.
  10. Defense Acquisition Program Administration(DAPA), "Designated Utilization plan for Organizations for Defense Standardization Development", DAPA Technical Report, 2017.
  11. Defense Acquisition Program Administration, "Classification of Defense Technology Data for Standardization Designation Agency Designation and Operation", 2018.