Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on The Impact of Enterprise Innovation Factors on Enterprise Innovation Performance: Analysis of The Differences between Innovation Acceleration Factors(High, Low Level) and Innovation Hindrance Factors(High, Low Level) by Groups

기업혁신요인이 기업혁신성과에 미치는 영향 연구 : 혁신촉진요인(High, Low 수준)과 혁신저해요인(High, Low 수준)의 집단별 차이 분석

  • Ji, Yong-Bin (Department of Business Consulting, General Graduate School, Daejeon University) ;
  • Seo, Young Wook (Department of Business Consulting, General Graduate School, Daejeon University)
  • 지용빈 (대전대학교 일반대학원 융합컨설팅학과) ;
  • 서영욱 (대전대학교 일반대학원 융합컨설팅학과)
  • Received : 2021.01.21
  • Accepted : 2021.04.02
  • Published : 2021.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Enterprise is focused on R&D innovative activities in order to achieve sustainable growth & secure competitive advantage. There are many factors that influence enterprise innovation performance, but enterprise innovation activities do not always have a positive effect. Therefore, this study analyzed the effects of on innovation performance, focusing on innovation acceleration factors and innovation hindrance factors. The research model analyzed 2,081 national manufacturing enterprises that responded to the 2016 Korean Innovation Survey (STEPI). SPSS 25.0 was used to perform reliability, feasibility, and logistic regression analysis. The results are as follows. First, innovation activities have positive effects on enterprise product and process innovation performance. On the other hand, government support had the opposite results. Second, the collaboration of technology showed a positive effect on product innovation performance, independent of innovation acceleration and hindrance factors. Third, innovation activities showed a positive effect on process innovation performance, regardless of the innovation acceleration and hindrance factors. Unlike prior studies limited to technological innovation, this study analyzed the attitudes of enterprises toward innovation acceleration and hindrance factors. This study is expected to contribute to establishing a strategy for reducing the failure and risk of innovation due to its findings on how innovation performance varies by groups.

기업은 지속적인 성장과 경쟁우위 확보를 위해 기술개발 관련 적극적인 혁신 활동을 하고 있다. 이러한 기업혁신활동이 기업혁신성과에 미치는 요인은 여러 가지가 있지만, 기업의 이러한 혁신 활동이 항상 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것은 아니다. 이에 본 연구에서는 기업혁신요인 중 혁신촉진요인과 혁신저해요인을 중심으로 혁신성과에 미치는 효과를 분석하였다. 연구모형은 2016년 기술혁신조사(STEPI)에 응답한 2,081개 국내 제조기업을 분석하였고, 신뢰도, 타당성 및 로지스틱 회귀분석을 위해 SPSS 25.0이 사용되었다. 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 혁신 활동은 제품혁신성과와 공정혁신성과에 긍정적인 영향을 미치며, 정부지원은 반대의 결과를 나타냈다. 둘째, 기술 협력은 혁신촉진 및 저해요인과 상관없이 제품혁신성과에 긍정적인 영향을 나타냈다. 셋째, 혁신 활동은 혁신촉진 및 저해요인과 상관없이 공정혁신성과에 긍정적인 영향을 나타냈다. 본 연구는 기술적 혁신에 한정된 기존 선행연구들과는 달리 혁신촉진요인과 혁신저해요인에 대한 기업들의 태도를 구분하여 그에 따라 집단별로 혁신 성과가 어떻게 달라지는지를 중심으로 수행하였기 때문에 혁신의 실패와 위험부담을 낮출 수 있는 기업혁신전략을 수립하는데 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Evangelista, "Innovation in the Service Sector Results from the Italian Statistical Survey", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.58, No.3, pp.51, 1998. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(98)00025-0
  2. M. A. Schilling, Strategic management of technological innovation, p.366, McGraw-Hill Publishers, 2008, pp.25-30
  3. K. H. Bong, J. M. Park, "A Study on Technological Innovation and Employment Performance from the Perspective of Process : Focused on Small and Medium Sized Enterprises", Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, Vol.21, No.4, pp.1508-1535, 2018.
  4. S. Roper, J. Du, J. H. Love, "Modelling the innovation value chain", Research Policy, Vol.37, No.6-7, pp.961, 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.005
  5. N. Amara, P. D'Este, R. Landry, D. Doloreux, "Impacts of obstacles on innovation patterns in KIBS firms", Journal of Business Research, Vol.69, No.10, pp.4065, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.045
  6. P. Cohen, Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity, p.422, A Bradford Book Publishers, 1995, pp.127-128
  7. J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, Innovation: A Guide to the Literature, p.26, Oxford University Press, 2005, pp.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0001
  8. I. March-Chorda, A. Gunasekaran, B. Lloria-Aramburo, "Product development process in Spanish SMEs: an empirical research", Technovation, Vol.22, No.5, pp.301-312, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00021-9
  9. F. Galia, D. Legros, "Complementarities Between Obstacles to Innovation: Evidence from France", Research Policy, Vol.33, No.8, pp.1185-1199, 2004. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.06.004
  10. G. Battisti, P. Stoneman, "How Innovative are UK Firms? Evidence from the Fourth UK Community Innovation Survey on Synergies between Technological and Organizational Innovations", British Journal of Management, Vol.21, No.1, pp.187, 2010. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00629.x
  11. D. H. Kim, "A Typology of Enterprise Innovation based on a Meta-model", Industrial Development Institute Kyungsung University, Vol.33, No.1, pp.117-152, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22793/indinn.2017.33.1.005
  12. K. W. Cho, S. W. Kim, Y. R. Cho, H. J. Kang, S. A. Sohn "2017 Guidelines of the Korean Innovation Survey - Recent Developments and Applications -", Science & Technology Policy Institute, pp.1-245, 2017.
  13. J. S. Kim, J. W. Kang, "An Exploratory Study of Innovation Types and their Importances under the 4th Industrial Revolution - Focusing on the Analysis of Delphi Results -", National Future Technology Management Institute Chungbuk University, Vol.4, No.2, pp.1-26, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33443/tm.2019.4.2.1
  14. K. S. Kim, "Causal Links from Innovative Activities to Financial Performance in Korean Manufacturing Firms: Mediating Effects of Innovative and Operational Performance", Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, Vol.17, No.1, pp.146-173, 2014. UCI: G704-001043.2014.17.1.007
  15. S. J. Kim, S. J. Yong, "A Study on Determinant Factors of the Joint Technology Development Project Performance between SMEs and Universities", Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol.19, No.1, pp.145-176, 2011. UCI: G704-001004.2011.19.1.005
  16. L. Li, F. Jiang, Y. Pei, N. Jiang, "Entrepreneurial orientation and strategic alliance success: The contingency role of relational factors", Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol.72, pp.46, 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.011
  17. D. W. Ryu, D. H. Lee, J. H. Park, "The effects of alliance management capability on alliance performance in R&D SMEs: Moderating effect of competitive strength", Institute of Social Sciences, Vol.25, No.1, pp.276-296, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46415/jss.2018.03.25.1.276
  18. C. Y. Lee, B. K. Kim, "The Success Factors on Private-Public Technology Collaboration of SMEs", Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, Vol.22, No.3, pp.416-445, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35978/jktis.2019.06.22.3.416
  19. S. W. Kim, STEPI Insight, Science & Technology Policy Institute, Korea, pp.1-26.
  20. H. J. Chang, "An Analysis on the Effect of Government Supports for the R&D of SMEs: Focused on Technical, Economic, and Social Outcomes", Korea Society Policy Association, Vol.26, No.4, pp.195-218, 2016. UCI: G704-000388.2016.26.4.002
  21. I. Busom, J. A. Velez-Ospina, "Innovation, Public Support, and Productivity in Colombia. A Cross-industry Comparison", World Development, Vol.99, No.C, pp.75-94, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.07.005
  22. S. Y. Kang, S. M. Park, "A Relationship between Innovation Capability and Performance: Differences in Firm Development Stages", Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, Vol.13, No.2, pp.91-100, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.13.2.201804.91
  23. K. Blind, "The influence of regulations on innovation: A quantitative assessment for OECD countries", Research Policy, Vol.41, No.2, pp.391-400, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.008
  24. S. Breschi, F. Malerba, L. Orsenigo, "Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation", The Economic Journal, Vol.110, No.463, pp.388-410, 2000. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00530
  25. L. C. Levin, A. K. Klevorick, R. R. Nelson, S. G. Winter, "Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol.1987, No.3, pp.783-831, 1987. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2534454
  26. E. P. Gallie, D. Legros, "French firms' strategies for protecting their intellectual property", Research Policy, Vol.41, No.4, pp.780-794, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.008
  27. W. Kim, S. Y. Chung, "An Effect of Appropriability on R&D Collaboration and Product Innovation Performance: Focusing on the Moderated Mediation of Government R&D Support", Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol.25, No.1, pp.1-34, 2017. UCI: G704-001004.2017.25.1.002 https://doi.org/10.14383/SIME.2017.25.1.1
  28. H. C. Kim, "The Study on the Factors Affecting the Choice of Open Innovation strategy : Focused on Internal Competence and Appropriability", Korean Journal of Business Administration, Vol.31, No.9, pp.1705-1722, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18032/kaaba.2018.31.9.1705
  29. Coad, A. G. Pellegrino, M. Savona, "Barriers to innovation and firm productivity", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol.25, No.3, pp.321-334, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2015.1076193
  30. K. N. Lee, H. J. Jang, S. O. Choi, "Determinants and Complementarities of the Obstacles to Technological Innovation from Korea", The Korea Association for Policy Studies, Vol.20, No.4, pp.109-130, 2016. UCI: G704-000863.2016.20.4.006
  31. H. P. Choi, J. H. Lee, "An Analysis of the Factors that Influence the Choice of R&D Collaboration :Evidence from Korean Manufacturing Companies", Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol.18, No.1, pp.153-175, 2010. UCI: G704-001004.2010.18.1.009
  32. D. H. Kim, J. K. Kim, "The Effects of R&D Capability and Market Orientation on Product Innovation Performance : The Moderating Role of Technological Innovation Orientation", Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems, Vol.22, No.4, pp.79-95, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9723/jksiis.2017.22.4.079
  33. J. H. Lim, B. K. Kim, "The Effects of Entrepreneurship Orientation and Absorptive Capacity on Corporate Performance : Focusing on Mediating Effects of Product Innovation Performance", Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol.21, No.4, pp.1536-1576, 2018.
  34. J. Papinniemi, "Creating a model of process innovation for reengineering of business and manufacturing", International Journal of Production Economics, Vol.60-61, pp.95-101, 1999. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00146-7
  35. T. Reichstein, A. Salter, "Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms", Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol.15, No.4, pp.653-682, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtl014
  36. G. Dosi "Sources, Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation", Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.26, No.3, pp.1120-1171, 1988. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2726526
  37. A. Afuah, Business models : a strategic management approach, p.415, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2004, pp.62-65
  38. K. Pavitt, "Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory", Research Policy, Vol.13, No.6, pp.343-373, 1984. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
  39. H. Kim, N. J. Kim, "The Effect of Innovation Success Factors and Innovation Capabilities on Performance in Manufacturing Firm", Journal of the Korean Production and Operations Management Society, Vol.20, No.3, pp.99-125, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21131/kopoms.20.3.200909.99
  40. Damanfour, W. M. Evan, "Organizational Innovation and performance : The Problem of 'Organizational Lag'", Journal of Management Studies, Vol.29, No.3, pp.392-402, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788117449
  41. J. E. Song, Y. J. Kim, "The Impact of Technological Collaboration, Absorptive Capacity, and Innovation Strategy on Innovation Output in Small- and Medium-sized Firms", Korea Internet e-Commerce Association, Vol.17, No.1, pp.93-116, 2017. UCI: G704-001762.2017.17.1.008 https://doi.org/10.29331/JKRAIC.2017.02.17.1.93
  42. V. Hippel, The Sources of Innovation, p.232, New York Oxford University Press, 1988, pp.102-107.
  43. T. K. Sung, J. S. Kim, "Determinants of Firm's Innovation Performance: Evidence from Jeonbukbased Firms in Korea", Korean Journal of Business Administration, Vol.22, No.4, pp.2017-2036, 2009. UCI: G704-000789.2009.22.4.022
  44. E. Y. Kim, "A Study on the Determinants of Technological Innovation in the Korean Manufacturing Firms -Focusing on Technological Regime-", Korean Industrial Economic Association, Vol.22, No.4, pp.2017-2036, 2009. UCI: G704-001438.2011.24.3.028
  45. K. A. Kim, "The Impact of Supporting Policies in Innovation of Cultural Industry", The Korean Governance Review, Vol.21, No.1, pp.415-432, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17089/kgr.2014.21.1.018
  46. T. H. Park, K. H. Park, "Effect of IT Manufacturing Firms' Technological Innovation Factors -Focused on Cooperative relation and Governmental support-", Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol.10, No.9, pp.39-45, 2012. UCI: G704-002010.2012.10.9.007 https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2012.10.9.039
  47. S. Y. Lee, S. H. Suh, "Factors Influencing the Performance of Interfirm R&D Cooperation Supported by the Government", Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, Vol.14, No.3, pp.664-688, 2011. UCI: G704-001043.2011.14.3.003
  48. A. Leiponen, J. Byma, "If you cannot block, you better run: Small firms, cooperative innovation, and appropriation strategies'", Research Policy, Vol.38, No.9, pp.1478-1488, 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.06.003
  49. R. Veugelers, B. Cassiman, "Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms'", Research Policy, Vol.28, No.1, pp.63-80, 1999. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00106-1
  50. J. Beldwin, Z. Lin, "Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers", Research Policy, Vol.31, No.1, pp.1-18, 2002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00110-X
  51. S. Y. Kang, S. M. Park, J. T. Hwang, "The Impact of Different Types of Innovation on the Survival of Service Firms", Industrial Development Institute Kyungsung University, Vol.32, No.4, pp.211-242, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22793/indinn.2016.32.4.009
  52. J. F. Hair, R. E. Andercon, R. L. Tatham, B. Black, Multivariate Data Analysis 6th Edition, p.928, Prentice Hall, 2006, pp.321-327.
  53. Y. S. Choi, K. W. Kim, "What Explains Firm's Innovativeness in Korean Manufacturing? : Global Activity and Knowledge Sources", KDI Journal of Economic Policy, Vol.35, No.2, pp.41-70, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23895/kdijep.2013.35.2.41