DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dynamic Analysis of a KAERI Channel Type Shear Wall: System Identification, FE Model Updating and Time-History Responses

KAERI 채널형 전단벽체의 동적해석; 시스템판별, FE 모델향상 및 시간이력 응답

  • Cho, Soon-Ho (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Gwangju University)
  • 조순호 (광주대학교 건축학부/건축공학전공)
  • Received : 2021.01.28
  • Accepted : 2021.04.08
  • Published : 2021.05.01

Abstract

KAERI has planned to carry out a series of dynamic tests using a shaking table and time-history analyses for a channel-type concrete shear wall to investigate its seismic performance because of the recently frequent occurrence of earthquakes in the south-eastern parts of Korea. The overall size of a test specimen is b×l×h =2500 mm×3500 mm×4500 mm, and it consists of three stories having slabs and walls with thicknesses of 140 mm and 150 mm, respectively. The system identification, FE model updating, and time-history analysis results for a test shear wall are presented herein. By applying the advanced system identification, so-called pLSCF, the improved modal parameters are extracted in the lower modes. Using three FE in-house packages, such as FEMtools, Ruaumoko, and VecTor4, the eigenanalyses are made for an initial FE model, resulting in consistency in eigenvalues. However, they exhibit relatively stiffer behavior, as much as 30 to 50% compared with those extracted from the test in the 1st and 2nd modes. The FE model updating is carried out to consider the 6-dofs spring stiffnesses at the wall base as major parameters by adopting a Bayesian type automatic updating algorithm to minimize the residuals in modal parameters. The updating results indicate that the highest sensitivity is apparent in the vertical translational springs at few locations ranging from 300 to 500% in variation. However, their changes seem to have no physical meaning because of the numerical values. Finally, using the updated FE model, the time-history responses are predicted by Ruaumoko at each floor where accelerometers are located. The accelerograms between test and analysis show an acceptable match in terms of maximum and minimum values. However, the magnitudes and patterns of floor response spectra seem somewhat different because of the slightly different input accelerograms and damping ratios involved.

Keywords

References

  1. ABAQUS. Analysis User's Manual. Ver. 6.11. USA. c2011.
  2. ANSYS. Robust Simulation and Analysis Software. Available from: http://www.ansys.com/. Release 11.0. ANSYS Incorporated. USA. c2007.
  3. Carr AJ. Ruaumoko3D; Inelastic Dynamic Analysis - User Manual. Dept. of Civil Engrg. Univ. of Canterbury. NZ. c2017.
  4. Cauberghe B. Applied Frequency-Domain System Identification in the Field of Experimental and Operational Modal Analysis. Ph.D. Thesis. Dept. of Mech. Engrg. Vrije Universiteit Brussel. Belgium. c2004.
  5. Dynamic Design Solutions. FEMtools Users' Guide Ver. 4.1. Leuven. Belgium. c2020.
  6. Ewins DJ. Modal testing: Theory, Practice and Application. Research Studies Press. Baldock, Hertfordshire, UK. c2000.
  7. Figueiras JA, Owen DRJ. Analysis of Elasto-Plastic and Geometrically Nonlinear Anisotropic Plates and Shells in Hinton E, Owen DRJ. Finite Element Software for Plates and Shells, Pineridge Press Limited. Swansea, UK. c1984.
  8. Garbow BS. EISPACK-A Package of Matrix Eigensystem Routines. Computer Physics Communications. 1974;7:179-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(74)90086-1
  9. Heylen W, Lammens S, Sas P. Modal Analysis Theory and Testing. Dept. of Mech. Engrg. Katholieke Univ. Leuven. Belgium. c1995.
  10. Hrynyk TD. Behaviour and Modelling of Reinforced Concrete Slabs and Shells Under Static and Dynamic Loads. Ph.D. Thesis. Dept. of Civil Engrg. Univ. of Toronto. Canada. c2013.
  11. Hrynyk TD. Vecchio FJ. User's Manual of VecTor4. Univ. of Toronto. Canada. c2019.
  12. Kanaan AE, Powell GH. General Purpose Computer Program for Inelastic Dynamic Response of Plane Structures. Report EERC 73-6. College of Engrg. Univ. of Berkeley. USA. c1973.
  13. Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves GL. OpenSees Command Language Manual. Pacific Earthquake Engrg. Research (PEER) Center. USA. c2005.
  14. Peeters B, Van Der Auweraer H, Guillaume P, Leuridan J. The PolyMAX Frequency-Domain Method: A New Standard for Modal Parameter Estimation. Shock and Vib. Special Issue Dedicated to Prof. Bruno Piombo. 2004;11:395-409.
  15. Puthanpurayil AM, Carr AJ, Lavan O, Dhakal RP. Effect of Choice of Inherent Damping Models on Reliability of Incremental Dynamic Analysis. NZSEE Conference. Paper 0346. Wellington. April 27th-29th. c2017.
  16. Vecchio FJ, Collins MP. The Modified Compression-Field Theory for Reinforced Concrete Elements Subjected to Shear. ACI J. 1986;83(2):219-231.
  17. Wilson EL. Three-Dimensional Static and Dynamic Analysis of Structures - A Physical Approach with Emphasis on Earthquake Engineering. Computers and Structures Inc. Berkeley, California, USA. c2002.
  18. Wong PS, Vecchio FJ. VecTor2 & FormWorks User's Manual. Univ. of Toronto. Canada. c2002.
  19. Structural Vibration Solutions. ARTeMIS Extractor: Ambient Response Testing and Modal Identification Software. User's Manual. Denmark. c2001.