대한건축학회논문집 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea)

  • 제37권4호
  • /
  • Pages.143-152
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2733-6239(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-6247(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

지하상가 통로의 공간적 요소가 경로 선택에 미치는 영향 - T자형 길목에서 출입구 찾기 시뮬레이션 -

The Influence of Corridor Spatial Elements on Route Choice in Underground Streets - Exit-finding Simulation at T-typed Intersection -

  • 장소정 (부산대학교 대학원 실내환경디자인학과) ;
  • 박수빈 (부산대학교 실내환경디자인학과 및 생활환경연구소)
  • 투고 : 2021.02.19
  • 심사 : 2021.04.14
  • 발행 : 2021.04.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Wayfinding concerns spatial experience and personal safety. Although studies suggest that corridor spatial configuration promotes wayfinding behavior, a lack of empirical evidence and detailed discussion in practice prevails, especially in underground streets where people often encounter wayfinding issues. To verify whether corridor configuration attributes, namely, width, length, height, or radian, encourage people's turn-taking during exit-finding in practice, we simulated a series of exit-finding tasks in virtual streets combined with four different T-intersections. This study finds that exit-finders prefer going the upward pathway via stairs followed by the corridors with broader widths or curved corners; with the short ones showing no visible affinity; besides, exit-finders seem to have an inherent right turn preference when facing a two directional-path. As a theoretical contribution to wayfinding issues, this study offers some empirical evidence for the effect of corridor configurations on pathfinders' turn-taking. Deviating from researches conducted in image-choices, e.g., the floor plans, virtual environment screenshots, or panoramic photos, this study applies virtual roaming technology combined with UE4 to obtain relevant experimental data, and provides some ideas for future research.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. An, D., Ye, J., & Ding, W. (2019). Spatial Features and Elements Affecting Indoor Wayfinding-A Case Study in a Transit Hub. Paper presented at the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.
  2. Apelt, R., Crawford, J., & Hogan, D. J. (2007). Wayfinding design guidelines: CRC for Construction Innovation. pp. 6-8.
  3. Arthur, P., & Passini, R. (2002). Wayfinding: people, signs, and architecture: Focus Strategic Communications.
  4. Buchner, S., Holscher, C., Konieczny, L., & Wiener, J. (2009). How the geometry of space controls visual attention during spatial decision making. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
  5. Calori, C., & Vanden-Eynden, D. (2015). Signage and wayfinding design: a complete guide to creating environmental graphic design systems: Wiley Online Library. pp. 80-89.
  6. Dogu, U., & Erkip, F. (2000). Spatial factors affecting wayfinding and orientation: A case study in a shopping mall. Environment and Behavior, 32(6), 731-755. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972775
  7. Easa, S. M. (2000). Reliability approach to intersection sight distance design. Transportation research record, 1701(1), 42-52. https://doi.org/10.3141/1701-06
  8. Frankenstein, J., Buchner, S. J., Tenbrink, T., & Holscher, C. (2010). Influence of geometry and objects on local route choices during wayfinding. Paper presented at the International Conference on Spatial Cognition.
  9. Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: using public space. Island press. pp. 129-183.
  10. Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L.-A. B. (2018). Research methods for the behavioral sciences: Cengage Learning. pp. 212-225.
  11. Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension (Vol. 609). Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  12. Hsieh, T. J. T., Kuo, Y. H., & Niu, C. K. (2018, July). Utilizing HMD VR to improve the spatial learning and wayfinding effects in the virtual maze. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 38-42). Springer, Cham.
  13. Iftikhar, H., Shah, P., & Luximon, Y. (2020). Human wayfinding behaviour and metrics in complex environments: a systematic literature review. Architectural Science Review, 1-12.
  14. International Code Council. (2000). International building code 2000. International Code Council.
  15. Koffka, K. (2013). Principles of Gestalt psychology (Vol. 44). Routledge.
  16. Lee, E. H., Christopoulos, G. I., Kwok, K. W., Roberts, A. C., & Soh, C.-K. (2017). A psychosocial approach to understanding underground spaces. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 452.
  17. Levinew, M., Marchon, I., & Hanley, G. (1984). The placement and misplacement of you-are-here maps. Environment and Behavior, 16(2), 139-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916584162001
  18. Mack, K., & Ruud, R. (2019). Unreal Engine 4 Virtual Reality Projects: Build Immersive, Real-world VR Applications Using UE4, C++, and Unreal Blueprints. Packt Publishing Ltd.
  19. Marquardt, G. (2011). Wayfinding for people with dementia: a review of the role of architectural design. HERD: Health Environments Research Design Journal, 4(2), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/193758671100400207
  20. Na, Hyun-Sook, & Lee, Sang-Hong. (2009). A Study on the User's Walking Characteristics by Analysis on the Underground Shopping Center's Space in the Subway Station Area at Daegu. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 25(12), 129-136.
  21. Niu, Li. (2009). The research of spatial cognition and wayfinding in building complex. World Architecture, 2, 124-125.
  22. Park, S., & Zhang, S. (2019). A pilot study of circulation layout based on perceived retail crowding. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 49, 305-315. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.04.008
  23. Pohl, R. F. (Ed.). (2016). Cognitive illusions: Intriguing phenomena in judgement, thinking and memory. Psychology Press.
  24. Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H., & Petrusic, W. M. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic bulletin and review, 16(2), 328-331. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.2.328
  25. Shaofei, N. I. U., & Zhongwei, S. H. E. N. (2016). Landscape design of urban rail transit complex based on the concept of sustainable development. Journal of Landscape Research, 8(4), 21.
  26. Suzer, O. K., & Olgunturk, N. (2018). The aid of colour on visuospatial navigation of elderly people in a virtual polyclinic environment. Color Research &Application, 43(6), 872-884. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22272
  27. Uzunoglu, S. S., & Uzunoglu, K. (2011). The application of formal perception of gestalt in architectural education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 993-1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.184
  28. Veeraswamy, A., Galea, E. R., & Lawrence, P. J. (2011). Wayfinding behavior within buildings-An international survey. Fire Safety Science, 10, 735-748. https://doi.org/10.3801/IAFFS.FSS.10-735
  29. Vilar, E., Rebelo, F., Noriega, P., Teles, J., & Mayhorn, C. (2013). The influence of environmental features on route selection in an emergency situation.
  30. Wiener, J. M., Holscher, C., Buchner, S., & Konieczny, L. (2012). Gaze behaviour during space perception and spatial decision making. Psychological research, 76(6), 713-729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0397-5
  31. Zhou, Y., & Zhao, J. (2016). Assessment and planning of underground space use in Singapore. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 55, 249-256 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.018