The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative evaluation of peri-implant stress distribution in implant protected occlusion and cuspally loaded occlusion on a 3 unit implant supported fixed partial denture: A 3D finite element analysis study

  • Received : 2020.11.18
  • Accepted : 2021.04.23
  • Published : 2021.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose. To assess peri-implant stress distribution using finite element analysis in implant supported fixed partial denture with occlusal schemes of cuspally loaded occlusion and implant protected occlusion. Materials and methods. A 3-D finite element model of mandible with D2 bone with partially edentulism with unilateral distal extension was made. Two Ti alloy identical implants with 4.2 mm diameter and 10 mm length were placed in the mandibular second premolar and the mandibular second molar region and prosthesis was given with the mandibular first molar pontic. Vertical load of 100 N and and oblique load of 70 N was applied on occlusal surface of prosthesis. Group 1 was cuspally loaded occlusion with total 8 contact points and Group 2 was implant protected occlusion with 3 contact points. Results. In Group 1 for vertical load, maximum stress was generated over implant having 14.3552 Mpa. While for oblique load, overall stress generated was 28.0732 Mpa. In Group 2 for vertical load, maximum stress was generated over crown and overall stress was 16.7682 Mpa. But for oblique load, crown stress and overall stress was maximum 22.7561 Mpa. When Group 1 is compared to Group 2, harmful oblique load caused maximum overall stress 28.0732 Mpa in Group 1. Conclusion. In Group 1, vertical load generated high implant stress, and oblique load generated high overall stresses, cortical stresses and crown stresses compared to vertical load. In Group 2, oblique load generated more overall stresses, cortical stresses, and crown stresses compared to vertical load. Implant protected occlusion generated lesser harmful oblique implant, crown, bone and overall stresses compared to cuspally loaded occlusion.

Keywords

References

  1. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Ohman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977;16:1-132.
  2. Ashman RB, Van Buskirk WC. The elastic properties of a human mandible. Adv Dent Res 1987;1:64-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374870010011401
  3. Schulte W. Implants and the periodontium. Int Dent J 1995;45:16-26.
  4. Gartner JL, Mushimoto K, Weber HP, Nishimura I. Effect of osseointegrated implants on the coordination of masticatory muscles: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:185-93. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.108067
  5. Misch CE, Bidez MW. Implant-protected occlusion: a biomechanical rationale. Compendium. 1994;15: 1330, 1332, 1334 passim; quiz 1344.
  6. Trivedi S. Finite element analysis: A boon to dentistry. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2014;4:200-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2014.11.008
  7. Nelson S, Ash M. Wheeler's dental anatomy, physiology and occlusion. 9th ed; Elsevier, 2009. p. 45-8.
  8. Rodriguez-Ciurana X, Vela-Nebot X, Segala-Torres M, Rodado-Alonso C, Mendez-Blanco V, Mata-Bugueroles M. Biomechanical repercussions of bone resorption related to biologic width: a finite element analysis of three implant-abutment configurations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29:479-87.
  9. Misch CE, Bidez MW. Occlusal considerations for implant supported prostheses: implant protective occlusion. In Misch CE, editor: Dental implant prosthetics. St. Louis, Elsevier/Mosby, 2005, p. 472-510.
  10. Misch CE, Bidez MW. Implant-protected occlusion. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;7:25-9.
  11. Misch CE. Dental implant prosthetics. 2nd ed; Elsevier Mobsy, 2015. p. 874-912.
  12. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms: ninth edition. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117(5S):e1-105.
  13. Falcon-Antenucci RM, Pellizzer EP, de Carvalho PS, Goiato MC, Noritomi PY. Influence of cusp inclination on stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses. A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthodont 2010;19:381-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00582.x
  14. Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A, Sevimay M, Soykan E, Unsal E. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: a three-dimensional finite element study. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:144-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.10.018
  15. Rilo B, da Silva JL, Mora MJ, Santana U. Guidelines for occlusion strategy in implant-borne prostheses. A review. Int Dent J 2008;58:139-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2008.tb00189.x
  16. Sevimay M, Usumez A, Eskitascioglu G. The influence of various occlusal materials on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: a three-dimensional finite-element study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;73:140-7.
  17. Swaminathan Y, Rao G. Implant protected occlusion. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2013;11:20-5. https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-1132025
  18. Verma M, Nanda A, Sood A. Principles of occlusion in implant dentistry. J Int Clin Dent Res Organ 2015;7:27-33 https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0754.172924
  19. Misch CE. Medial positioned lingualized occlusion. In Misch Institute manual. Birmingham, Mich, 1991.
  20. Misch CE. Occlusal considerations for implant-supported prostheses. In Misch CE, editor: Contemporary implant dentistry. St. Louis, Mosby. 1993.
  21. Guven S, Atalay Y, Asutay F, Ucan MC, Dundar S, Karaman T, Gunes N. Comparison of the effects of different loading locations on stresses transferred to straight and angled implant-supported zirconia frameworks: a finite element method study. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 2015;29:766-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2015.1028445
  22. Curtis DA, Sharma A, Finzen FC, Kao RT. Occlusal considerations for implant restorations in the partially edentulous patient. J Calif Dent Assoc 2000;28:771-9.
  23. Goellner M, Schmitt J, Karl M, Wichmann M, Holst S. The effect of axial and oblique loading on the micromovement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:257-64.
  24. Akca K, Uysal S, Cehreli MC. Implant-tooth-supported fixed partial prostheses: correlations between in vivo occlusal bite forces and marginal bone reactions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:331-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01169.x
  25. Lundgren D, Laurell L, Falk H, Bergendal T. Occlusal force pattern during mastication in dentitions with mandibular fixed partial dentures supported on osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:197-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90176-4
  26. Kaukinen JA, Edge MJ, Lang BR. The influence of occlusal design on simulated masticatory forces transferred to implant-retained prostheses and supporting bone. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:50-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90346-7