DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of feed form and particle size on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, carcass characteristics, and gastric health in growing-finishing pigs

  • Jo, Yun Yeong (Feed Innovation Center, Sunjin Company Limited) ;
  • Choi, Myung Jae (Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Chung, Woo Lim (Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hong, Jin Su (Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lim, Jong Seon (Feed Innovation Center, Sunjin Company Limited) ;
  • Kim, Yoo Yong (Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2020.11.16
  • Accepted : 2021.01.12
  • Published : 2021.06.01

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of feed processing and particle size on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, carcass characteristics, and gastric health in growing-finishing pigs. Methods: A total of 360 growing pigs (22.64±0.014 kg initial body weight [BW]) were allocated to 1 of 6 treatments with 6 replicates by BW and sex, and 10 pigs were housed in one pen in a randomized complete block design. The BW and feed intake were recorded to calculate growth performance. For the digestibility trial, a total of 24 barrows with an initial BW of 33.65±0.372 kg were split into 6 treatments with a completely randomized design. Dietary treatments were designed by a 2×3 factorial arrangement of treatments based on two main factors, particle size (600, 750, 900 ㎛) and feed form (mash and pellet) of diet. Experimental diets were formulated to contain the requirements of the NRC (2012). Results: The BW and average daily gain were not changed by dietary treatments, and the feed intake of finishing pigs (wks 6 to 12) was increased when the pigs were fed a mash diet (p<0.05). For the overall period, the feed efficiency of pigs was improved with the pellet diet (p<0.01) and reduced particle size (p<0.05). The pellet diet had effects on increasing crude fat digestibility (p<0.01) relative to a mash diet, but there was no considerable change in dry matter and crude protein digestibilities by dietary treatments. In the evaluation of gastric health, a trend for an increased incidence of keratinization in the esophageal region was observed as particle size decreased (p = 0.07). Conclusion: Feed efficiency could be improved by pellet diet and reduced particle size. Nutrient digestibility, carcass characteristics, and gastric health were not affected by feed form, and particle size ranged from 600 to 900 ㎛.

Keywords

References

  1. Attia YA, El-Tahawy WS, Abd El-Hamid AEE, Hassan SS, Nizza A, El-Kelaway MI. Effect of phytase with or without multienzyme supplementation on performance and nutrient digestibility of young broiler chicks fed mash or crumble diets. Ital J Anim Sci 2012;11:e56. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2012.e56
  2. Attia YA, El-Tahawy WS, Abd El-Hamid AEE, et al. Effect of feed form, pellet diameter and enzymes supplementation on growth performance and nutrient digestibility of broiler during days 21-37 of age. Arch Anim Breed 2014;57:34. https://doi.org/10.7482/0003-9438-57-034
  3. Mavromichalis I, Hancock JD, Senne BW, et al. Enzyme supplementation and particle size of wheat in diets for nursery and finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 2000;78:3086-95. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.78123086x
  4. Rojas OJ, Stein HH. Effects of reducing the particle size of corn grain on the concentration of digestible and metabolizable energy and on the digestibility of energy and nutrients in corn grain fed to growing pigs. Livest Sci 2015;181:187-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.09.013
  5. Kim JC, Mullan BP, Pluske JR. A comparison of waxy versus non-waxy wheats in diets for weaner pigs: effects of particle size, enzyme supplementation, and collection day on total tract apparent digestibility and pig performance. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2005;120:51-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.01.004
  6. Oryschak MA, Simmins PH, Zijlstra RT. Effect of dietary particle size and carbohydrase and/or phytase supplementation on nitrogen and phosphorus excretion of grower pigs. Can J Anim Sci 2002;82:533-40. https://doi.org/10.4141/A02-016
  7. Mahan DC, Pickett RA, Perry TW, Curtin TM, Featherston WR, Beeson WM. Influence of various nutritional factors and physical form of feed on esophagogastric ulcers in swine. J Anim Sci 1966;25:1019-23. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1966.2541019x
  8. Maxwell CV, Reimann EM, Hoekstra WG, Kowalczyk T, Benevenga NJ, Grummer RH. Effect of dietary particle size on lesion development and on the contents of various regions of the swine stomach. J Anim Sci 1970;30:911-22. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1970.306911x
  9. Rojas OJ, Stein HH. Processing of ingredients and diets and effects on nutritional value for pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2017;8:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-017-0177-1
  10. Jensen AH, Becker DE. Effect of pelleting diets and dietary components on the performance of young pigs. J Anim Sci 1965;24:392-7. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1965.242392x
  11. Lewis LL, Stark CR, Fahrenholz AC, Goncalves MAD, DeRouchey JM, Jones CK. Effects of pelleting conditioner retention time on nursery pig growth performance. J Anim Sci 2015;93:1098-102. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8072
  12. Ulens T, Demeyer P, Ampe B, Van Langenhove H, Millet S. Effect of grinding intensity and pelleting of the diet on indoor particulate matter concentrations and growth performance of weanling pigs. J Anim Sci 2015;93:627-36. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8362
  13. Steidinger MU, Goodband RD, Tokach MD, et al. Effects of pelleting and pellet conditioning temperatures on weanling pig performance. J Anim Sci 2000;78:3014-8. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.78123014x
  14. Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Swine, National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 2012.
  15. Latimer GW. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 19th ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International; 2012.
  16. De Jong J. Feed processing challenges facing the swine industry [dissertation]. Manhattan, KS, USA: Kansas State University; 2015.
  17. Nir I, Hillel R, Ptichi I, Shefet G. Effect of particle size on performance: 3. Grinding pelleting interactions. Poult Sci 1995;74:771-83. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0740771
  18. Potter ML, Tokach MD, DeRouchey JM, Goodband RD, Nelssen JL, Dritz SS. Effects of meal or pellet diet form on finishing pig performance and carcass characteristics. Manhattan, KS, USA: Kansas State University; 2009. https://doi.org/10.4148/2378-5977.6789
  19. Patience JF. Feed efficiency in swine. Wageningen, Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2012.
  20. Seerley RW, Vandergrift WL, Hale OM. Effect of particle size of wheat on performance of nursery, growing and finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 1988;66:2484-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1988.66102484x
  21. Paulk CB, Hancock JD. Effects of an abrupt change between diet form on growth performance of finishing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2016;211:132-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.10.017
  22. Goodband RD, Hines RH. The effect of barley particle size on starter and finishing pig performance. J Anim Sci 1987;65:317. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1987.651317x
  23. Ohh SJ, Allee GL, Behnke KC, Deyoe CW. Effect of particle size of corn and sorghum grain on performance and digestibility of nutrients for weaned pigs. J Anim Sci 1983;57(Suppl 1):260. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1983.571260x
  24. Wondra KJ, Hancock JD, Behnke KC, Hines RH, Stark CR. Effects of particle size and pelleting on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and stomach morphology in finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 1995;73:757-63. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.733757x
  25. Overholt MF, Lowell JE, Arkfeld EK, et al. Effects of pelleting diets without or with distillers' dried grains with solubles on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and gastrointestinal weights of growing-finishing barrows and gilts. J Anim Sci 2016;94:2172-83. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-0202
  26. Rojas OJ, Vinyeta E, Stein HH. Effects of pelleting, extrusion, or extrusion and pelleting on energy and nutrient digestibility in diets containing different levels of fiber and fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2016;94:1951-60. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-0137
  27. Schell TC, Van Heugten E. The effect of pellet quality on growth performance of grower pigs. J Anim Sci 1998;76(Suppl 1):185.
  28. Attia YA, El-Tahawy WS, Abd El-Hamid AEE, et al. Effect of feed form, pellet diameter and enzymes supplementation on carcass characteristics, meat quality, blood plasma constituents and stress indicators of broilers. Arch Anim Breed 2014;57:30. https://doi.org/10.7482/0003-9438-57-030
  29. Wondra KJ, Hancock JD, Kennedy GA, Hines RH, Behnke KC. Reducing particle size of corn in lactation diets from 1,200 to 400 micrometers improves sow and litter performance. J Anim Sci 1995;73:421-6. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.732421x
  30. Amaral NO, Amaral LGM, Cantarelli VS, Fialho ET, Zangeronimo MG, Rodrigues PB. Influence of maize particle size on the kinetics of starch digestion in the small intestine of growing pigs. Anim Prod Sci 2015;55:1250-4. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14050
  31. Appel WB. Physical properties of feed ingredients. Feed manufacturing technology. Arlington, VA, USA: American Feed Industry Association Inc.; 1994. pp.151-2.
  32. Kovalczyk T. Etiologic factors of gastric ulcers in swine. Am J Vet Res 1969;30:393-400.
  33. Ramis G, Gomez S, Pallares, FJ, Munoz A. Influence of farm size on the prevalence of oesophagogastric lesions in pigs at slaughter in south-east Spain. Vet Rec 2004;155:210-3. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.155.7.210
  34. Lawrence BV, Anderson DB, Adeola O, Cline TR. Fasting, transportation, and diet particle size influence development of stomach ulceration in pigs. West Lafayette, IN, USA: Purdue University; 1996.