DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국인의 중금속과 유기용제에 대한 인식도와 정보취득 경로

Public Cognition and Information Acquisition Route for Heavy Metals and Organic Solvents in General Population of Korea

  • 이채관 (인제대학교 의과대학 환경.산업의학연구소, 부산백병원 직업환경의학과)
  • Lee, Chae Kwan (Institute of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University)
  • 투고 : 2021.02.02
  • 심사 : 2021.03.13
  • 발행 : 2021.03.31

초록

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the public cognition and information acquisition route for heavy metals and organic solvents in the general population in order to provide information for the development of public relations materials. Methods: The study was carried out by questionnaire from January to March 2011 by an interview with trained surveyors. There were 700 participants, divided by gender and age. A questionnaire was issued consisting of subjective and objective cognition evaluation items and questions about information acquisition route and preferred information acquisition route for six heavy metals and five organic solvents. Data were expressed as a percentage using the SPSS 23.0 software package. Result: For heavy metals, subjective and objective cognition degrees were higher in the order of lead, mercury, cadmium, and arsenic. They were higher among males than females, and in adults compared to school-age subjects. For organic solvents, both cognition degrees were high in the order of acetone, benzene, and formaldehyde. However, cognition degree by gender and age showed a complex pattern. As a response to information acquisition route, broadcast media had the highest in all ages and genders, followed by word of mouth from neighbors in elementary school children, school education or expert lectures in middle and high school students up to people in their 30s, and print media among those in their 40s to over 60s. There was no difference in the order by gender. As a response to preference for information acquisition route, broadcast media also proved the highest in all ages and genders, followed by school education or professional lectures among those in elementary school and over their 60s, and the internet in other age groups. Females preferred school education or expert lectures and word of mouth from neighbors, while males preferred the internet. In the case of the internet, the ranking was higher for preferred information acquisition route compared with the ranking for information acquisition route. Conclusions: This data on cognition degree, information acquisition route, and preferred information acquisition route according to gender and age can provide basic data for the development of educational and promotional materials for heavy metals and organic solvents exposure management.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn KM, Kim JH, Kwon HJ, Chae YM, Hahm MI, et al. The prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and eczema in Korean children: Nationwide cross-sectional survey using complex sampling design. J Korean Med Assoc 2011;54(7): 769-778 doi: 10.5124/jkma.2011.54.7.769
  2. Bae HS, Kang IG, Lee SG, Eom SY, Kim YD, et al. Arsenic exposure and seafood intake in Korean adults. Hum Exp Toxicol 2017;36(5):451-460 doi:10.1177/0960327116665673
  3. Choi KY, Lee SM, Lee CM, Seo SC. Factor analysis of environmental disease by air pollution: analysis and implication of google trends data with big data. J Environ Health Sci 2018;44(6):563-571 https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2018.44.6.563
  4. Choi SY, So KH, Shim KC, Yeau SH. A Study on the Cognition of High School Students and Science Teachers of Seoul and Province of Gyeonggi on the Endocrine Disruptors. Korean Journal of Environmental Education 2006;19(3):93-101
  5. Greenberg MI, Hamilton RJ, Phillips SD, McCluskey GJ. Occupational industrial and environmental toxicology. 2nd edition. Piladelphia, USA. Mosby, Inc.; 2003. p. 91-102, 133-138, 306, 493-494
  6. Gu SG, Choi IJ, Kim W, Sun ON, Kim SB, et al. Study on the distribution of fluorides in plants and the estimation of ambient concentration of hydrogen fluoride around the area of the accidental release of hydrogen fluoride in gumi. J Environ Health Sci 2013:39(4):346-353 https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2013.39.4.346
  7. Ha EH, Kwon HJ. Issue in air pollution epidemiologic studies. Kor J Prev Med 2001;34(2):109-118
  8. Hong EY․ Lee SH․ So KH. The effect of a non-point pollution environmental education program on elementary school students' perception of water pollution and environmental literacy. Korean Journal of Environmental Education 2019;32(1):33-46 https://doi.org/10.17965/kjee.2019.32.1.33
  9. Im R, Youm HC, Kim DW, Bae HS, Ahn SJ et al. Dietary exposure assessment of arsenic in Korean adults. Environ Health Toxicol 2010;25(4):307-314
  10. Izmi K(translator Jeong HD). Dictionary of harmful substances in daily life. Seoul, Korea. Yuhan Munwhasa; 2007. p. 85-102, 189-224, 285-334
  11. Jeong YK. The Process of Antipollution Movements and Relation with Japanese Antipollution Movements in Korea in the 1980's: Focusing on Activities of Korea Research Institute for Pollution Problems over Onsan Desease. The Korean Journal of Japanology 2013;96:289-301
  12. Kim MR, Kim, HC. Recognition, information acquisition behavior, knowledge, behaviors to decrease exposure and education need toward endocrine disruptors among middle and high school students. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association 2009;21(3);123-142
  13. Kong D, Ytrehus E, Hvatum AJ, Lin H. Survey on environmental awareness of Shanghai college students. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2014;21(23):13672-13683 doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3221-0
  14. Korean Association of Pharmacy Education. Preventive pharmacy essentials. Seoul, Korea. Sinilbooks; 2009. p. 79-94, 245-291, 345-395.
  15. Moon KA, Chae HK. Diagnosis of students' cognition and understanding about heavy metals according to the different major between liberal art and science in high school. J Korean Chem Soc 2009;53(6): 793-804 doi:10.5012/JKCS.2009.53.6.793
  16. Nemery B, Hoet PHM, Nemmar A. The Meuse Valley fog of 1930: an air pollution disaster. Department of Medical History 2001;357(9257):704-708. Available from URL: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(00)04135-0/fulltext
  17. Oh EH, Lee EI, Lim HS, Jang JY. Human multi-route exposure assesment of cadmium and lead for Korean volunteers. J Prev Med Public Health 2006; 39(1):53-58
  18. Potenza A. In 1952 London, 12,000 people died from smog - here's why that matters now. The Verge. Dec. 16, 2017. Available from URL: https://www.theverge.com/2017/12/16/16778604/london-great-smog-1952-death-in-the-air-pollution-book-review-john-reginald-christie [accessed 28 December 2020]
  19. Rom WN. Environmental and occupational medicine. 3rd edition. Philadelphia-New York, USA. Lippincott-Raven publishers; 1998. p. 973-1115. 1483. 1703-1708
  20. Science On. Comprehensive evaluation of the 1st and 2nd Korean national environmental health survey. 2014. Available from URL https://scienceon.kisti.re.kr/commons/util/originalView.do?cn=TRKO201700007752&dbt=TRKO&rn=[accessed 20 Jan 2021]
  21. Seo HJ, Lee HJ. How air pollutants influence on Environmental diseases? : Focused on Seoul Metropolitan Area. Seoul Studies 2019;20(3):39-59
  22. Son BC, Lee CK, Suh CH, Kim KH, Kim JH, et al. Blood lead concentration and exposure related factors in Korea from the national environmental health survey(KoNEHS) II (2012-2014). J Occup Environ Hygiene 2019;16(12):763-774 https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2019.1668000
  23. Sung HK, Seo KS, Son CG. A observational study on children with atopic dermatitis in atopic-free village. J Pediatr Korean Med 2014;28(1):1-6 https://doi.org/10.7778/jpkm.2014.28.1.001
  24. Yoo HJ, Lee DG. A study of the cognition and behavior of middle school students on the endocrine disruptors: focusing on suwon City. The Environmental Education 2003;16(1):12-24 https://doi.org/10.7778/jpkm.2014.28.1.001
  25. Yoo Y, Lee SM, Seo SC, Choung JT, Lee SJ, et al. The clinical and immunological effects of forest camp on childhood environmental diseases. The Journal of Korean institute of forest recreation 2011;15(2): 85-93 https://doi.org/10.34272/FOREST.2011.15.2.010