서비스연구 (Journal of Service Research and Studies)

  • 제11권3호
  • /
  • Pages.1-16
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2234-2850(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2466-1813(eISSN)
서비스사이언스학회 (The Society of service Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

크라우드펀딩 플랫폼에서 정보 비대칭과 감성 커뮤니케이션이 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

A study on the effects of Information asymmetry and sentimental communication in Crowdfunding platform

  • 임성준 (서강대학교 일반대학원 경영학과) ;
  • 이종학 (서강대학교 경영전문대학원 글로벌서비스경영학과)
  • Lim, Sung Jun (Sogang University, Department of Business Administration) ;
  • Lee, Jong Hag (Graduate school of Business, Sogang University)
  • 투고 : 2021.07.28
  • 심사 : 2021.09.17
  • 발행 : 2021.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 최근 많은 관심을 받고있는 크라우드펀딩을 더많은 창업 및 기업가가 활용하기 위해서는 크라우드펀딩의 성공을 가져온 요인을 이해하는 것이 중요하나, 동시에 정보의 비대칭성을 이유로 비판받고 있는바 펀드사와 자금 조달자를 위하여 비대칭 정보 소스에서 수집된 정보가 크라우드펀딩 성공에 미치는 영향을 제시하고자 한다. 또한, 금번 연구를 통하여 서비스 사이언스가 추구하는 융합의 사회적 장을 마련하고 실질적인 연구와 실천을 수행하며 제품의 서비스화, 서비스의 제품화를 주도하는 핵심 연구에 과학적 접근법이 필요한 상황에 대하여 지식기반서비스의 실제 사례를 도출하고자 하였다. 첫째, 크라우드펀딩 플랫폼 내에서 자금 제공자와 기금 모금자 사이의 상호작용의 중요성에 대하여 조사하였으며, "comments" 섹션에서는 자금 제공자와 기금 모금자 간의 의사소통을 통하여 비대칭 정보의 정도를 줄인다. 그리고, 잠정적인 자금 제공자의 측면에서는 투자에 대한 수익을 상실하지 않고 보다 확실한 정보를 수집하기 위하여 "comments"섹션을 최대한 활용해야 함을 알 수 있다. 둘째,"story"(비대칭소스)와 "comments" 섹션에서 감성을 기반으로 낙관적이고 비관적인 정보를 분석 하였다. 결론적으로 "comments" 섹션의 낙관적 정보와 비관적 정보가 크라우드펀딩 성공에 큰 영향을 미친다는 것을 보여주며, 상대적으로 "story" 섹션의 영향은 특정 조건에서의 비관적인 정보에만 한정됨을 알수 있다. 크라우드펀딩 플랫폼은 창업(startup) 및 기업가들이 비즈니스를 시작할 수 있는 혁신적이고 생산적인 방법으로, 정보가 크라우드펀딩의 성공에 중요한 역할을 하므로 최상의 의사소통 방법을 구축하는 데 집중하는 것이 필수적임을 확인할수 있다.

Recently, crowdfunding has been receiving increased attention due to the variety of novel ways it provides for connecting funders and fundraisers. Concurrently, however, it has been criticized on the grounds of information asymmetry. We are interested in whether information collected from an asymmetric information source significantly influences crowdfunding success. Through this study, we would like to establish a social field of convergence pursued by Serve Science and to conduct practical research and practice together. First, we investigated the importance of interaction between funders and fundraisers within the crowdfunding platform. In the "comments" section, communication between funders and fundraisers reduces the degree of asymmetric information. In the aspect of presumable funders, they should make the best of the "comments" section to collect more solid information without losing return on their investment. Second, we analyze sentiment-based optimistic and pessimistic information from the "story" (asymmetric source) and "comments" sections. In conclusion, it shows that the optimistic and pessimistic information of the "comments" section has a great impact on crowdfunding success and that the influence of the "story" section is limited to pessimistic information under certain conditions. The crowdfunding platform is an innovative and productive way for startups and entrepreneurs to start a business, and since information an important role in the success of crowdfunding, It can be seen that it is essential to focus on establishing the best communication methods.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Beaulieu, T. Sarker, S. and Saker, S. (2016). A conceptual framework for understanding crowdfunding, communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37, 1-31.
  2. Bing, L. (2015). Sentiment analysis: Mining opinions, sentiments, and emotions, Cambridge University Press.
  3. Cravajal, M. Garcia-Aviles, J. A. and Gonzalez, J. L. (2012). Crowdfunding and non-profit media: The emergence of new models for public interest journalism, Journalism Practice, 695-6), 638-647.
  4. Chen, J. Xu, H. and Whinston, A. B. (2011). Moderated online communities and quality of user-generated content, Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(2), 237-268. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222280209
  5. Chen, S. Y. Chen, C. N. Chen, Y. R. Yang, C. W. Lin, W. C. and Wei, C. P. (2015). Will your project get the green Hight? Predicting the success of crowdfunding campaigns, In Proceedings of Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, 79.
  6. Cui, G. Lui, H. K. and Guo, X. (2012). The effect of online consumer reviews on new product sales, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.2753/jec1086-4415170102
  7. Dennis, A. R. Fuller, R. M. and Valacich, J. S. (2008). Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity, MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 575-600. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148857
  8. Ding, X. Liu, B. and Yu, P. S. (2008). A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining, In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, (pp. 231-240).
  9. Fisk, R. P. Patricio, L. Ordanini, A. Miceli, L. Pizzetti, M. and Parasuraman, A. (2011). Crowdfunding: Transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms, Journal of Service Management, 22(4), 443-470. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231111155079
  10. Gaikar, D. and Marakarkandy, B. (2015). Product sales prediction based on sentiment analysis using Twitter data, International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology, 6(3), 2303-2313.
  11. George, A. (1970). The market for lemons: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
  12. Kim, S. S. and Crompton, J. L. (2001). The effects of different types of information messages on perceptions of price and stated willingness-to-pay, Journal of Leisure Research, 33(3), 299-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2001.11949943
  13. Kosh, J. and Siering, M. (2015). Crowdfunding success factors: The characteristics of successfully funded projects on crowdfunding platforms, Proceedings of the 23rd European Conference on Information System(ECIS 2015); Muenster, Germany.
  14. Kunz, M. M. Bretschneider, U. Erler, M. and Leimeister, J. M. (2017). An empirical investigation of signaling in reward-based crowdfunding, Electronic Commerce Research, 17(3), 425-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-016-9249-0
  15. Kuppuswamy, V. and Bayus, B. (2013). Crowdfunding creative ideas: the dynamics of project backers in Kickstarter, Working Paper.
  16. Liang, T. P. Li, X. Yang, C. T. and Wang, M. (2015). What in consumer reviews affects the sales of mobile apps: A multifacet sentiment analysis approach, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 20(2), 236-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2016.1087823
  17. Lin, Y. Lee, W.C. and Chang, C. C. (2016). Analysis of rewards on reward-based crowdfunding platforms, Paper presented at the 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.
  18. Liu, B. (2012). Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In G. Hirst (ed.), Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies #16. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
  19. Mitra, T. and Gilbert, E. (2014). The language that gets people to give: Phrases that predict success on Kickstarter, In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 49-61.
  20. Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study, Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005
  21. Parhankangas, A. and Renko, M. (2017). Linguistic style and crowdfunding success among social and commercial entrepreneurs, Journal of Business Venturing, 32(2), 215-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.11.001
  22. Parhankangas, A. and Ehrlich, M. (2014). How entrepreneurs seduce business angels: An impression management approach, Journal of Business Venturing, 29(4), 543-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.08.001
  23. Racherla, P. and Friske, W. (2012). Perceived 'usefulness' of online consumer reviews: An exploratory investigation across three services categories, Electronic Commerce Research, and Applications, 11(6), 548-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2012.06.003
  24. Ruiter, R. A. Abraham, C. and Kok, G. (2001). Scary warnings and rational precautions: A review of the psychology of fear appeals, Psychology and Health, 16(6), 613-630. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440108405863
  25. Sharot, T. (2011). The optimism bias, Current Biology, 21(23), R941-R945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.030
  26. Van de Kauter, M. Breesch, D. and Hoste, V. (2015). A fine-grained analysis of explicit and implicit sentiment in financial news articles, Expert Systems with Applications, 42(11), 4999-5010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.007
  27. Vlasic, G. and Kesic, T. (2007). Analysis of consumers' attitudes toward interactivity and relationship personalization as contemporary developments in interactive marketing communication, Journal of Marketing Communications, 13(2), 109-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527260601070417
  28. Wang, N. Li, Q. Liang, H. Ye, T. and Ge, S. (2018). Understanding the importance of interaction between creators and backers in crowdfunding success, Electronic Commerce Research, and Applications, 27, 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2017.12.004