DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Does the general public have concerns with dental anesthetics?

  • Received : 2020.11.17
  • Accepted : 2021.02.08
  • Published : 2021.04.01

Abstract

Background: Consumers and patients in the last two decades have increasingly turned to various internet search engines including Google for information. Google Trends records searches done using the Google search engine. Google Trends is free and provides data on search terms and related queries. One recent study found a large public interest in "dental anesthesia". In this paper, we further explore this interest in "dental anesthesia" and assess if any patterns emerge. Methods: In this study, Google Trends and the search term "dental pain" was used to record the consumer's interest over a five-year period. Additionally, using the search term "Dental anesthesia," a top ten related query list was generated. Queries are grouped into two sections, a "top" category and a "rising" category. We then added additional search term such as: wisdom tooth anesthesia, wisdom tooth general anesthesia, dental anesthetics, local anesthetic, dental numbing, anesthesia dentist, and dental pain. From the related queries generated from each search term, repeated themes were grouped together and ranked according to the total sum of their relative search frequency (RSF) values. Results: Over the five-year time period, Google Trends data show that there was a 1.5% increase in the search term "dental pain". Results of the related queries for dental anesthesia show that there seems to be a large public interest in how long local anesthetics last (Total RSF = 231) - even more so than potential side effects or toxicities (Total RSF = 83). Conclusion: Based on these results it is recommended that clinicians clearly advice their patients on how long local anesthetics last to better manage patient expectations.

Keywords

References

  1. Yarbrough C, Nasseh K, Vujicic M. Key differences in dental care seeking behavior between Medicaid and non-Medicaid adults and children. Health Policy Institute Research Brief. American Dental Association. September 2014. Available from: http://www.ada.org/-/media/ADA/Science%20and%20Research/HPI/Files/HPIBrief_0814_4.ashx.
  2. Bersell CH. Access to oral health care: a national crisis and call for reform. J Dent Hyg 2017; 91: 6-14.
  3. American Dental Association. Oral health and well-being in the United States. Oral Health & Well-Being - Health Policy Institute State Fact Sheets. Available from: www.ada.org/en/science-research/health-policy-institute/oral-health-and-well-being.
  4. Nuti SV, Wayda B, Ranasinghe I, Wang S, Dreyer RP, Chen SI, et al. The use of Google trends in health care research: a systematic review. PLoS One 2014; 9: e109583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109583
  5. Liu R, Garcia PS, Fleisher LA. Interest in anesthesia as reflected by keyword searches using common search engines. J Anesth Clin Res 2012; 3: 1000187.
  6. Mavragani A, Ochoa G, Tsagarakis KP. Assessing the methods, tools, and statistical approaches in Google Trends research: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20: e270. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9366
  7. Niforatos JD, Feinstein MM, Pescatore RM. Search engine queries as a metric of public interest in anesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 2019; 47: 302-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X19842574
  8. Moreira NC, Pacheco-Pereira C, Keenan L, Cummings G, Flores-Mir C. Informed consent comprehension and recollection in adult dental patients: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2016; 147: 605-19.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2016.03.004
  9. Hulin J, Baker SR, Marshman Z, Albadri S, Rodd HD. Development of a decision aid for children faced with the decision to undergo dental treatment with sedation or general anaesthesia. Int J Paediatr Dent 2017; 27: 344-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12267
  10. Hajivassiliou EC, Hajivassiliou CA. Informed consent in primary dental care: patients' understanding and satisfaction with the consent process. Br Dent J 2015; 219: 221-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.687