Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies (한국지리정보학회지)

The Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies (한국지리정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Non-point source Vulnerable Areas In West Nakdong River Watershed Using TOPSIS

TOPSIS를 이용한 서낙동강 유역 비점오염 취약지역 평가 연구

  • 갈병석 (주식회사 다온솔루션) ;
  • 박재범 (주식회사 다온솔루션) ;
  • 김예진 (부산가톨릭대학교 환경공학과)
  • Received : 2021.01.19
  • Accepted : 2021.02.09
  • Published : 2021.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigated the characteristics of the watershed and pollutants in the Seonakdong River basin in the lower stream of the Nakdong River Water System, and evaluated the areas vulnerable to nonpoint pollution by subwatershed according to the TOPSIS(Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method. The selection method consists of selection of evaluation factors, calculation of weights and selection of areas vulnerable to non-point pollution through evaluation factors and weights. The entropy method was used as the weight calculation method and TOPSIS, a multi-criteria decision making(MCDM) method was used as the evaluation method. Indicator data were collected as of 2018, and national pollution source survey data and national statistics were used. Most of the vulnerable watersheds were highly urbanized had a large number of residents and were evaluated as having a large land area among industrial facilities and site area rate. Through this study, it is necessary to approach a variety of weighting methodologies to assess the vulnerability of non-point pollution with high reliability, and scientific analysis of the factors that affect non-point pollution sources and consideration of the effects are necessary.

본 연구는 낙동강수계 하류에 있는 서낙동강 유역을 대상으로 유역 및 오염원 특성을 조사하여 TOPSIS(Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) 방법에 따른 소유역별 비점오염 취약지역을 평가하였다. 선정 방법은 평가인자 선정, 가중치 산정, 평가인자와 가중치를 통한 비점오염 취약지역 선정으로 구성되어 있다. 가중치 산정방법으로는 엔트로피법을 이용하고 평가기법으로는 다기준 의사결정 기법(Multi-criteria Decision Making, MCDM)인 TOPSIS를 이용하였다. 지표 자료는 2018년을 기준으로 수집하였으며, 전국오염원조사 자료와 국가통계자료를 활용하였다. 취약한 유역들은 대부분 도시화가 많이 진행된 지역이며 거주 인구수가 많고 산업시설 및 토지계 중 대지면적 비율이 높은 유역으로 평가되었다. 본 연구를 통하여 신뢰도 높은 비점오염 취약 평가를 위해서는 다양한 가중치 방법론의 접근이 필요하고 비점오염원에 영향을 주는 인자들에 대한 과학적 분석 및 영향성에 대한 고찰이 필요할 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Al-Kloub, B., Al-Shemmeri, T., and Pearman, A. 1997. The role of weights in multi-criteria decision aid, and the ranking of water projects in Jordan. European Journal of Operational Research 99:278-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00051-3
  2. Chung, E.-S., Won, K., Kim, Y. and Lee, H. 2014. Water resource vulnerability characteristics by district's population size in a changing climate using subjective and objective weights. Sustainability 6: 6141-6157. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6096141
  3. Hajkowicz, S., Collins, K. 2007, A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resources Management 21(9):1553-1566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9112-5
  4. Hobbs, B. F., Chankong, V., Hamadeh, W. and Stakhiv, E. Z. 1992. Does choice of multicriteria method matter? An experiment in water resources planning. Water Resources Research 28:1767-1779. https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR00712
  5. Hwang, C. L., and Yoon, K. 1981. Multiple attribute decision making an introduction. Sage Publications. Thousand Oaks London New Delhi:38-45.
  6. Kal, B.S., Mun, H.S., Hong, S.H., Park, C.D., Gil, H.N. and Park, J.B. 2019. A Study on the Analysis and Evaluation of Vulnerability Index for the Management of Nonpoint source in SoOak River Watershed. Journal of rhe Korean association of Geographic Information Studies 22(2):1-18.
  7. Kim, H.T., Shin, D.S. and Kim, Y.S. 2014. Prioritization of Control Areas using Vulnerable Areas by Non-point Source Pollution. Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers 56(6):11-18. https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2014.56.6.011
  8. Kim, Y.K., Chung, E.S. and Lee, G.S. 2012. Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach to Flood Vulnerability Assessment in Kore. Journal of Korean Water Resources Association 45(9):901-913. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2012.45.9.901
  9. Korea Environment Institute. 2012. Green Infrastructure Strategy for Urban Climate Adaptation: 69.
  10. Lee, C.W., Shin, H.J., Kwon, M.S., Lee, G.M., Nam, S.H. and Kang, M.S. 2019. An Approach to Drought Vulnerability Assessment using TOPSIS Method. Journal of rhe Korean association of Geographic Information Studies 22(4): 102-115.
  11. Lee, G. M., Jun, K.-S., and Chung, E.-S. 2013. Integrated multicriteria flood vulnerability approach using fuzzy TOPSIS and Delphi technique, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13:1293-1312. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1293-2013
  12. Lee, M.J., Hyun, Y.J. and Hwang, S.I. 2015. An Assessment of Groundwater Contamination Vulnerability and Priority Areas for Groundwater Management Using GIS and Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of rhe Korean association of Geographic Information Studies 18(3):35-51. https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2015.18.3.035
  13. National Institute of Environmental Research. 2015. Decision of Prioritization of Catchments and Determination of Control Target for Non-point Source Pollution Management. :8-13 (III).
  14. National Institute of Environmental Research. 2018. The whole country pollution source materials of investigation.
  15. Park, H.S., Kim, J.B., Um, M.J. and Kim, Y.J. 2016. A Study for the Selection Method of Control Area of Nonpoint Pollution Source. Journal of Korean Water Resources Association 49(8):685-692. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2016.49.8.685
  16. Park, S.H., Jeong, W.H., Yi, S.J. and Lim, B.S. 2010. A Study for the Selection Method of Control Area of Nonpoint Pollution Source. Journal of Korean Society on Water Quality 26(5):761-767.
  17. Roy, B., and Vincke, P. 1981. Multicriteria analysis: Survey and new directions. European Journal of Operational Research 8:207-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(81)90168-5
  18. Sarraf, F. and Nejad, S.H. 2020. Improving performance evaluation based on balanced scorecard with grey relational analysis and data envelopment analysis approaches: case study in water and wastewater companies. Evaluation and Program Planning 79:1-11.
  19. Yeh, C.H., Willis, R.J., Deng, H., and Pan, H. 1999. Task oriented weighting in multi-criteria analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 119:130-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)90353-8