DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Update of Korean Standard Classification of Diseases for Rectal Carcinoid and Its Clinical Implication

직장 유암종 질병 분류 코드 변경과 임상적 의의

  • Kim, Eun Soo (Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University)
  • 김은수 (경북대학교 의과대학 내과학교실)
  • Received : 2021.10.18
  • Accepted : 2021.11.21
  • Published : 2021.12.01

Abstract

Carcinoid tumor is called as neuroendocrine tumor and is classified into neuroendocrine tumor Grade 1, neuroendocrine tumor Grade 2, and neuroendocrine carcinoma based on the differentiation of tumors. Recently, the incidence of rectal carcinoid tumor has been increasing probably due to the increased interest on screening colonoscopy and the advancement of endoscopic imaging technology. As the rectal carcinoid shows a wide range of clinical characteristics such as metastasis and long-term prognosis depending on the size and histologic features, it is a challenge to give a consistent diagnostic code in patients with the rectal carcinoid. If the rectal carcinoid tumor is less than 1 cm in size, it can be given as the code of definite malignancy or the code of uncertain malignant potential according to International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O) by World Health Organization (WHO). Because patients get different amount of benefit from the insurance company based on different diagnostic codes, this inconsistent coding system has caused a significant confusion in the clinical practice. In 2019, WHO updated ICD-O and Statistics Korea subsequently changed Korean Standard Classification of Diseases (KCD) including the code of rectal carcinoid tumors. This review will summarize what has been changed in recent ICD-O and KCD system regarding the rectal carcinoid tumor and surmise its clinical implication.

Keywords

References

  1. World Health Organization. International classification of diseases for oncology: ICD-O-3. 3rd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000.
  2. Shields CJ, Tiret E, Winter DC. Carcinoid tumors of the rectum: a multi-institutional international collaboration. Ann Surg 2010;252:750-755. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fb8df6
  3. Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Kotake K, Muto T, Nagawa H. Prognosis and risk factors of metastasis in colorectal carcinoids: results of a nationwide registry over 15 years. Gut 2007;56:863-868. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2006.109157
  4. Kobayashi K, Katsumata T, Yoshizawa S, et al. Indications of endoscopic polypectomy for rectal carcinoid tumors and clinical usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:285-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0765-y
  5. Moon CM, Huh KC, Jung SA, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of rectal neuroendocrine tumors according to the pathologic status after initial endoscopic resection: a KASID multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2016;111:1276-1285. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2016.267
  6. Sung HY, Kim SW, Kang WK, et al. Long-term prognosis of an endoscopically treated rectal neuroendocrine tumor: 10-year experience in a single institution. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;24:978-983. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283551e0b