Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Investigation on the Network Analysis Papers by Content Analysis and Bibliometric Analysis

네트워크 분석 논문의 고찰: 계량서지적 분석과 내용분석을 중심으로

  • 정은경 (이화여자대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2021.02.23
  • Accepted : 2021.03.17
  • Published : 2021.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Research in various academic fields using network analysis techniques has been conducted and grown. This study performed bibliographical analysis and content analysis on a total of 2,187 network analysis papers published in journals from 2003 to 2021. The results showed that the fields of Pedagogy, Interdisciplinary Research, Computer Science, Library and Information Science, Public Administration, and Business Administration were higher in terms of the number of research papers. From the perspective of journal, mega-journals were indicated as the most productive journals. However, when looking at the impact based on the number of citations, the strength of Public Administration, Library and Information Science, and Pedagogy is clearly revealed. The results of the analysis by authors can also confirm the higher impact of Journalism, Public Administration Science, and Library and Information Science. Of the 1,537 authors identified, very few authors are active in research, confirming the need to expand the researcher base. The results of content analysis showed that the weighted and non-directional network was the most common network type with using the research papers as a data set. Generally nodes are expressed as words and links are expressed as relationship. For network analysis, the use of KrKwic, UCINET, NetMiner, and NetDraw is the most prominent.

네트워크 분석 기법을 활용한 연구가 다양한 학문 분야에서 수행되고 있다. 본 연구는 2003년부터 2021년까지 국내 학술지에 게재된 네트워크 분석 논문 총 2,187건을 대상으로 계량서지적 분석과 내용분석을 수행하였다. 분석결과는 살펴보면, 논문 생산에 있어서 교육학, 학제간연구, 컴퓨터학, 문헌정보학, 행정학, 경영학 등의 우위를 확인할 수 있다. 학술지 단위로 보면, 메가 학술지의 강세가 나타난다. 그러나 피인용 기반의 영향력을 살펴보면, 행정학, 문헌정보학, 교육학의 영향력을 뚜렷하게 확인할 수 있다. 저자 단위로 분석한 결과 역시 언론정보학, 행정학, 문헌정보학의 우위를 확인할 수 있다. 파악된 1,537명의 저자 중에서 극소수의 저자가 활발한 연구활동을 하는 것으로 나타났으며, 이를 통해 연구자 저변 확대의 필요성도 확인할 수 있다. 내용분석의 결과를 살펴보면, 논문을 데이터셋으로 하여 가중/비방향네트워크를 형성하는 것이 가장 일반적인 네트워크 형태로 나타났다. 노드는 단어, 링크는 동시출현으로 표현되는 것이 보편적이며, 분석을 위해서는 KrKwic, UCINET, NetMiner, NetDraw 의 활용이 가장 두드러졌다.

Keywords

References

  1. An, Hee Gab & Shin, Chan-Su (2004). A minimum-diameter spanning tree with bounded degrees. Journal of KIISE: Computer Systems and Theory, 31(1.2), 78-85.
  2. Chae, Jong Hun (2009). A study on public conflict structure using social network analysis: Case study of shin-uljin nuclear power plant construction in Korea. Korean Public Administration Review, 43(2), 147-176.
  3. Cho, Jane (2011). A study for research area of library and information science by network text analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(4), 65-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.065
  4. Choi, SeungBae, Kang, Changwan, Choi, Hyongjun, & Kang, Byung Uk (2011). Social network analysis for a soccer game. Journal of the Korean Data And Information Science Sociaty, 22(6), 1053-1063.
  5. Choi, Young-chool & Park, Soo-Jung (2011). Analyzing trends in the study of public administration: Application of the network text analysis method. Korean Public Administration Review, 45(1), 123-139.
  6. Jang, Yeon Jin (2010). A study on women's welfare organization's network: Focusing on network centrality and organizational effectiveness. Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies, 41(4), 313-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.16999/kasws.2010.41.4.313
  7. Kim, Haewon & Jun, chaenam (2014). An exploratory study on content creation methods utilizing big data: Linguistic and story resources for effective creation of TV home shopping content. Journal of Cybercommunication Academic Society, 31(3), 5-51.
  8. Kim, Junhyeon (2015). An essay for understanding the meaning of the network text analysis results in study of the public administration. Institute for Humanities and Social Sciences, 16(4), 247-280. https://doi.org/10.15818/ihss.2015.16.4.247
  9. Kim, Seonghee & Chang, Ro-Sa (2010). The study on the research trend of social network analysis and the its applicability to information science. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(4), 71-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.4.071
  10. Ko, Kwang Yong (2014). Comparative study on maeul community network of autonomous districts and role of intermediary support organization: Focused on comparison between the dongdaemun-gu and the seongbuk-gu of the seoul metropolitan city. Kookmin Social Science Reviews, 26(2), 131-159.
  11. Lee, Hee-Yeon & Kim, Hong Ju (2006). The analysis of the structure of commuting network in seoul metropolitan area. Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 9(1), 91-111.
  12. Lee, Hyejun, Lee, Dong Il, & Lee, Ju Hyun (2010). Development of franchise education program through semantic network analysis. Korea Business Review, 14(2), 105-128.
  13. Lee, Jae Yun (2006a). Centrality measures for bibliometric network analysis. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(3), 191-214. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2006.40.3.191
  14. Lee, Jae Yun (2006b). A study on the network generation methods for examining the intellectual structure of knowledge domains. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(2), 333-355.
  15. Lee, Jae Yun (2006c). A novel clustering method for examining and analyzing the intellectual structure of a scholarly field. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 23(4), 215-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.4.215
  16. Lee, Jae Yun (2013). A comparison study on the weighted network centrality measures of tnet and WNET. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(4), 241-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.241
  17. Lee, Soosang (2010). A preliminary study on the co-author network analysis of korean library & information science research community. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(2), 297-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.41.2.201006.297
  18. Lee, Soosang (2014). A content analysis of journal articles using the language network analysis methods. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(4), 49-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.4.049
  19. Leem, Byung-Hak (2012). An effect of co-authorship network on research performance: Focusing on co-authoring of logos management review. Logos Management Review, 10(1), 1-20.
  20. Nam, Chang Woo (2012). The effects of students' centrality of their social network on their academic achievement and attitude toward online cooperative learning. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 20(2), 51-73.
  21. Nam, Inyong & Park, Han Woo (2007). Network analysis of headlines in the newspaper articles on the prospective presidential candidates and their pr strategy in Korea. Korean Party Studies Review, 6(1), 79-107.
  22. Namn, Su-Hyeon & Seol, Sungsoo (2007). Coauthorship analysis of innovation studies in Korea: A social network perspective. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 10(2), 605-628.
  23. Park, Chisung (2010). Placing social network analysis on public administration/policy research in Korea. The Korea Association for Policy Studies, 19(4), 115-154.
  24. Park, Chisung & Won, Gu-hwan(2009). Practical use of social network analysis in organizational diagnosis. Korean Review of Organizational Studies, 6(2), 1-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.21484/kros.2009.6.2.1
  25. Park, Chisung, Oh, Jae Rok, & Nam, Ju Hyun (2011). An empirical study of national government reorganization: A focus on changes in the network structures of formal document exchanges between the roh and lee administrations. Journal of Public Administration, 49(4), 51-82.
  26. Park, Han Woo & Leydesdorff, Loet (2004). Understanding the KrKwic: A computer program for the analysis of Korean text. Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 6(5), 1377-1387.
  27. Park, Ji Young, Kim, Tae Ho, & Park, Han Woo (2013). A semantic network analysis of celebrity messages on social network site: A case of Korean idol's Me2Day. Korean Journal of Broadcasting & Telecommunications Research, 36-74.
  28. Park, Jun Hyeong & Kwahk, Kee-Young (2013). The effect of patent citation relationship on business performance: A social network analysis perspective. Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, 19(3), 127-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2013.19.3.127
  29. Park, SoonAe & Park, Chisung (2008). A network analysis of the relationship between governmental departments: A focus on the national standardization. Korean Journal of Public Administration, 46(3), 207-234.
  30. Shim, Won-sup & Lee, Youn Taek (2008). Social network analysis for policy network among the interest groups of tourism industry in Korea. Journal of Tourism Sciences, 32(3), 13-35.
  31. Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892-895. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165821
  32. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  33. Otte, E. & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441-453. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150202800601