Ocean Systems Engineering

  • 제11권1호
  • /
  • Pages.83-97
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2093-6702(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-677X(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation of the U-shape submerged breakwater performance by the finite-different scheme

  • Barzegar, Mohammad (Department of Physical & Environmental Sciences, Texas A&M University-CC Corpus Christi)
  • 투고 : 2020.08.12
  • 심사 : 2021.01.08
  • 발행 : 2021.03.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The submerged U-shape breakwater interaction with the solitary wave is simulated by the Boussinesq equations using the finite-difference scheme. The wave reflection, transmission, and dissipation (RTD) coefficients are used to investigate the U-shape breakwater's performance for different crest width, Lc1, and indent breakwater height, du. The results show that the submerged breakwater performance for a set of U-shape breakwater with the same cross-section area is related to the length of submerged breakwater crest, Lc1, and the distance between the crests, Lc2 (or the height of du). The breakwater has the maximum performance when the crest length is larger, and at the same time, the distance between them increases. Changing the Lc1 and du of the U-shape breakwaters result in a significant change in the RTD coefficients. Comparison of the U-shape breakwater, having the best performance, with the averaged RTD values shows that the transmission coefficients, Kt, has a better performance of up to 4% in comparison to other breakwaters. Also, the reflection coefficients KR and the diffusion coefficients, Kd shows a better performance of about 30% and 55% on average, respectively. However, the model governing equations are non-dissipative. The non-energy conserving of the transmission and reflection coefficients due to wave and breakwater interaction results in dissipation type contribution. The U-shape breakwater with the best performance is compared with the rectangular breakwater with the same cross-section area to investigate the economic advantages of the U-shape breakwater. The transmission coefficients, Kt, of the U-shape breakwater shows a better performance of 5% higher than the rectangular one. The reflection coefficient, KR, is 60% lower for U-shape in comparison to rectangular one; however, the diffusion coefficients, Kd, of U-shape breakwater is 35% higher than the rectangular breakwater. Therefore, we could say that the U-shape breakwater has a better performance than the rectangular one.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Barzegar, M., Ketabdari, M. J., Kayhan, K. and Palaniappan, D. (2020), "Boussinesq Modelling of Waves and Currents in the Presence of Submerged Detached/Discontinuous Breakwaters", Int. J. Eng. Model., 33(3-4), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.31534/engmod.2020.3-4.ri.03a.
  2. Barzegar, M. and Palaniappan, D. (2020), "Numerical study on the performance of semicircular and rectangular submerged breakwaters", Ocean Syst. Eng., 10(2), 201-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/ose.2020.10.2.201.
  3. Beji, S. and Nadaoka, K. (1996), "A formal derivation and numerical modelling of the improved Boussinesq equations for varying depth", Ocean Eng., 23(8), 691-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-8018(96)84408-8.
  4. Bogucki, D., Haus, B.K. and Shao, M. (2020), February, "The Response of the Boundary Layer to Weak Forcing", In Ocean Sciences Meeting 2020. AGU.
  5. Bogucki, D., Haus, B.K. and Shao, M., (2020), February, The dissipation of energy beneath non-breaking waves, In Ocean Sciences Meeting 2020. AGU.
  6. Cannata, G., Gallerano, F., Palleschi, F., Petrelli, C. and Barsi, L. (2019), "Three-dimensional numerical simulation of the velocity fields induced by submerged breakwaters", Int. J. Mech, 13, 1-14.
  7. Chasten, M.A., Rosati, J.D., McCormick, J.W. and Randall, R.E. (1993), "Engineering design guidance for detached breakwaters as shoreline stabilization structures", US Army Corps of Engineers. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:8d8157a6-b8a9-43e0-84cf-cfbd1ef1d59e.
  8. Dick, T.M. and Brebner, A. (1969), "Solid and permeable submerged breakwaters", In Coastal Engineering 1968, 1141-1158. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780872620131.072.
  9. Dong, G.H., Zheng, Y.N., Li, Y.C., Teng, B., Guan, C.T. and Lin, D.F. (2008), "Experiments on wave transmission coefficients of floating breakwaters", Ocean Eng., 35(8-9), 931-938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2008.01.010.
  10. Esteban, M., Glasbergen, T., Takabatake, T., Hofland, B., Nishizaki, S., Nishida, Y. and Shibayama, T. (2017), "Overtopping of coastal structures by tsunami waves", Geosciences, 7(4), 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7040121.
  11. Israeli, M. and Orszag, S.A. (1981), "Approximation of radiation boundary conditions", J. Comput. Phys., 41(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90082-6.
  12. Garcia, N., Lara, J.L. and Losada, I.J. (2004), "2-D numerical analysis of near-field flow at low-crested permeable breakwaters", Coast. Eng., 51(10), 991-1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2004.07.017.
  13. Ghiasian, M., Rossini, M., Amendolara, J., Haus, B., Nolan, S., Nanni, A., Bel Had Ali, N. and Rhode-Barbarigos, L., (2019), "Test-Driven Design of an Efficient and Sustainable Seawall Structure", Coast. Struct., 1222-1227.
  14. Ghiasian, M., Carrick, J., Lirman, D., Baker, A., Ruiz-Merchan, J., Amendolara, J., Haus, B. and Rhode-Barbarigos, L., (2019), "Exploring Coral Reef Restoration for Wave-Energy Dissipation through Experimental Laboratory Testing", Coast. Struct., 975-980.
  15. Ghadimi, P. and Lamouki, M.B.P. (2017), "Finite difference simulation of regular wave propagation over natural beach and composite barriers by Nwogu's extended Boussinesq equations", Prog. Comput. Fluid Dynam., 17(4), 212-220. https://doi.org/10.1504/PCFD.2017.085178.
  16. Grue, J. and Palm, E. (1985), "Wave radiation and wave diffraction from a submerged body in a uniform current", J. Fluid Mech., 151, 257-278. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112085000957.
  17. Goda, Y. and Suzuki, Y. (1977), "Estimation of incident and reflected waves in random wave experiments", Coast. Eng., 828-845. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780872620834.048.
  18. Wei, G. and Kirby, J.T. (1995), "Time-dependent numerical code for extended Boussinesq equations", J. Waterw. Port, Coast. Ocean Eng., 121(5), 251-261. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1995)121:5(251).
  19. Ketabdari, M.J. and Barzegar Paiinlamouki, M. (2014), "Numerical modelling of induced rip currents by discontinuous submerged breakwaters", Int. J. Marine Sci. Eng., 4(1), 15-24.
  20. Ketabdari, M.J. and Moghaddasi, A. (2015), "Effects of discontinuous submerged breakwater on water surface elevation", Ocean Syst. Eng., 5(4), 319-329. https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2015.5.4.319.
  21. Lamberti, A., Archetti, R., Kramer, M., Paphitis, D., Mosso, C. and Di Risio, M. (2005), "European experience of low crested structures for coastal management", Coast. Eng., 52(10-11), 841-866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2005.09.010.
  22. Peregrine, D.H. (1972), "Equations for water waves and the approximations behind them", Waves on beaches and resulting sediment transport, 95-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-493250-0.50007-2.
  23. Madsen, P.A., Murray, R. and Sorensen, O.R. (1991), "A new form of the Boussinesq equations with improved linear dispersion characteristics", Coast. Eng., 15(4), 371-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3839(91)90017-B.
  24. Matsui, T., SangYeob, L. and Sano, K. (1991), "Hydrodynamic forces on a vertical cylinder in current and waves", J. Soc. Naval Arch.Japan, 1991(170), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.2534/jjasnaoe1968.1991.170_277.
  25. Morison, J.R. (1949), "Model study of wave action on underwater barriers", University of California, Berkeley, Fluid Mechanics Laboratory.
  26. Rahman, M.A., Mizutani, N. and Kawasaki, K. (2006), "Numerical modeling of dynamic responses and mooring forces of submerged floating breakwater", Coast. Eng., 53(10), 799-815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2006.04.001.
  27. Raman, H., Shankar, J. and Dattatri, J. (1977), "Submerged breakwaters", central board of irrigation and power J. 34, 205-212.
  28. Rambabu, A.C. and Mani, J.S. (2005), "Numerical prediction of performance of submerged breakwaters", Ocean Eng., 32(10), 1235-1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.10.023.
  29. Rojanakamthorn, S., Isobe, M. and Watanabe, A. (1991), "Modeling of wave transformation on submerged breakwater", Coast. Eng., 1060-1073. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780872627765.082.
  30. Seelig, W.N. (1980), "Two-Dimensional Tests of Wave Transmission and Reflection Characteristics of Laboratory Breakwaters", Coastal engineering research center Fort belvoi., https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.47373.
  31. Wang, Y., Yin, Z., Liu, Y., Yu, N. and Zou, W. (2019), "Numerical investigation on combined wave damping effect of pneumatic breakwater and submerged breakwater", Int. J. Naval Archit. Ocean Eng., 11(1), 314-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2018.06.006.
  32. Wei, G. and Kirby, J.T. (1995), "Time-dependent numerical code for extended Boussinesq equations", J. Waterw.Port, Coast. Ocean Eng., 121(5), 251-261. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1995)121:5(251).
  33. Xu, T.J., Wang, X.R., Guo, W.J., Dong, G.H. and Bi, C.W. (2019), "Numerical simulation of the hydrodynamic behavior of a pneumatic breakwater", Ocean Eng., 180, 108-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.04.010.
  34. Zaghian, R., Tavakoli, M. R., Karbasipour, M. and Ahmadabadi, M.N. (2017), "Experimental study of flow structures of a solitary wave propagating over a submerged thin plate in different angles using PIV technique", Int. J. Heat Fluid Fl., 66, 18-26 , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2017.05.010.