DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Some Congruences for Andrews' Partition Function ${\bar{\mathcal{EO}}}$(n)

  • Pore, Utpal (Department of Mathematics, Ramanujan School of Mathematical Sciences, Pondicherry University) ;
  • Fathima, Syeda Noor (Department of Mathematics, Ramanujan School of Mathematical Sciences, Pondicherry University)
  • Received : 2019.03.14
  • Accepted : 2020.10.08
  • Published : 2021.03.31

Abstract

Recently, Andrews introduced partition functions ����(n) and ${\bar{\mathcal{EO}}}$(n) where the function ����(n) denotes the number of partitions of n in which every even part is less than each odd part and the function ${\bar{\mathcal{EO}}}$(n) denotes the number of partitions enumerated by ����(n) in which only the largest even part appears an odd number of times. In this paper we obtain some congruences modulo 2, 4, 10 and 20 for the partition function ${\bar{\mathcal{EO}}}$(n). We give a simple proof of the first Ramanujan-type congruences ${\bar{\mathcal{EO}}}$ (10n + 8) ≡ 0 (mod 5) given by Andrews.

Keywords

References

  1. G. E. Andrews, The theory of partitions, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1998.
  2. G. E. Andrews, Integer partitions with even parts below odd parts and the mock theta functions, Ann. Comb., 22(2018), 433-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00026-018-0398-9
  3. G. E. Andrews, A. Dixit and A. J. Yee, Partitions associated with the Ramanujan/Watson mock theta functions ω(q), ν(q) and Φ(q), Res. Number Theory, 1(2015), Paper No. 19, 25 pp.
  4. G. E. Andrews, D. Passary, J. Sellers and A. J. Yee, Congruences related to the Ramanujan/Watson mock theta functions ω(q), ν(q), Ramanujan J., 43(2017), 347-357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11139-016-9812-2
  5. M. D. Hirschhorn, Another short proof of Ramanujan's mod 5 partition congruence, and more, Amer. Math. Monthly, 106(1999), 580-583. https://doi.org/10.2307/2589471
  6. M. D. Hirschhorn, The power of q, Developments in Mathematics 49, Springer, 2017.
  7. S. Ramanujan, Some properties of p(n), the number of partitions of n, Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc., 19(1919), 207-210.