DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Enhancement of Salt Stress Tolerance of Hordeum vulgare. L by Salt-Tolerant Bacteria

염내성 세균에 의한 보리의 염 스트레스 내성 촉진

  • Lee, Seul (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Khanal, Anamika (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Nogrado, Kathyleen (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Song, Hyung-Geun (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Cho, Yu-Sung (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Ji-Hoon (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Jeonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2021.12.13
  • Accepted : 2021.12.23
  • Published : 2021.12.31

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Salinity is one of the major limiting factors in agriculture that affect the growth and productivity of crops. It is economically difficult to artificially purify the soil affected by salt. Therefore, the use of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) in an effort to reduce stress caused by salt is emerging as a cost-effective and environment-friendly method. In this study, the purpose was to isolate the salt-tolerant bacteria from the rhizosphere soil and identify their ability to promote plant growth under salt stress condition. METHODS AND RESULTS: The isolates KST-1, KST-2, AST-3, and AST-4 that showed plant growth-promoting activity for barley in salt conditions were close to Bacillus cereus (KST-1, KST-2, and AST-4) and Bacillus thuringiensis (AST-3) and showed high salt tolerance up to 7% of additional NaCl to the media. When inoculated to barley, the strains had only minor effect on the length of the barley. However, the concentrations of chlorophyll in the barley leaves were found to be higher from the bacteria-inoculated pots than those from the uninoculated control. In particular, the chlorophyll concentration in Bacillus cereus AST-4 experiment was 5.45 times higher than that of the uninoculated control under the same experimental condition. CONCLUSION(S): The isolated salt-tolerant bacteria were found to influence on chlorophyll concentration of the barley. As represented by the strain AST-4, microbes may suggest a cost-effective and environmentally benign method to alleviate salt stress of crops cultivated in salt-accumulated soils such as reclaimed lands.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Rural Development Administration (Project No. PJ012263), Republic of Korea and in part by the National Research Foundation of Korea (grant NRF-2016R1D1A3B01012231).

References

  1. Allakhverdiev SI, Sakamoto A, Nishiyama Y, Inaba M, Murata N (2000) Ionic and osmotic effects of NaCl-induced inactivation of photosystems I and II in Synechococcus sp. Plant Physiology, 123, 1047-1056. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.123.3.1047.
  2. Ilangumaran G, Smith DL (2017) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in amelioration of salinity stress: A systems biology perspective. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01768.
  3. Munns R, Tester M (2008) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59, 651-681. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911.
  4. Grattan SR, Zeng L, Shannon MC, Roberts SR (2002) Rice is more sensitive to salinity than previously thought. California Agriculture, 56, 189-195. https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v056n06p189
  5. Glick BR (2012) Plant growth-promoting bacteria: Mechanisms and applications. Scientifica, 2012, 963401. https://doi.org/10.6064/2012/963401.
  6. Qin H, He L, Huang R (2019) The coordination of ethylene and other hormones in primary root development. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00874.
  7. Morgan PW, Drew MC (1997) Ethylene and plant responses to stress. Physiologia Plantarum, 100, 620-630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb03068.x.
  8. Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR (2004) Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants to salt stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 42, 565-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2004.05.009.
  9. Saravanakumar D, Samiyappan R (2007) ACC deaminase from Pseudomonas fluorescens mediated saline resistance in groundnut (Arachis hypogea) plants. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 102, 1283-1292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03179.x.
  10. Ma W, Guinel FC, Glick BR (2003) Rhizobium leguminosarum Biovar viciae 1-aminocyclopropane1-carboxylate deaminase promotes nodulation of pea plants. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 4396-4402. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.8.4396-4402.2003.
  11. Ma W, Charles TC, Glick BR (2004) Expression of an exogenous 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase gene in Sinorhizobium meliloti increases its ability to nodulate alfalfa. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70, 5891-5897. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.10.5891-5897.2004.
  12. Bianco C, Defez R (2010) Improvement of phosphate solubilization and Medicago plant yield by an indole3-acetic acid-overproducing strain of Sinorhizobium meliloti. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 76, 4626-4632. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02756-09.
  13. Bianco C, Defez R (2009) Medicago truncatula improves salt tolerance when nodulated by an indole3-acetic acid-overproducing Sinorhizobium meliloti strain. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60, 3097-3107. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp140.
  14. Egamberdieva D, Kucharova Z (2009) Selection for root colonising bacteria stimulating wheat growth in saline soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 45, 563-571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-009-0366-y.
  15. Glick BR, Cheng Z, Czarny J, Duan J (2007) Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producing soil bacteria. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 119, 329-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-007-9162-4.
  16. Zarei T, Moradi A, Kazemeini SA, Akhgar A, Rahi AA (2020) The role of ACC deaminase producing bacteria in improving sweet corn (Zea mays L. var saccharata) productivity under limited availability of irrigation water. Scientific Reports, 10, 20361. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77305-6.
  17. Sharma A, Johri BN, Sharma AK, Glick BR (2003) Plant growth-promoting bacterium Pseudomonas sp. strain GRP3 influences iron acquisition in mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilzeck). Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35, 887-894. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00119-6.
  18. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glockner FO (2012) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 41, D590-D596. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219.
  19. Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R, Richter L, Meier H, Yadhukumar, Buchner A, Lai T, Steppi S et al. (2004) ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Research, 32, 1363-1371. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh293.
  20. Rahman A, Sitepu IR, Tang S-Y, Hashidoko Y (2010) Salkowski's reagent test as a primary screening index for functionalities of rhizobacteria isolated from wild dipterocarp saplings growing naturally on medium-strongly acidic tropical peat soil. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 74, 2202-2208. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.100360.
  21. Wellburn AR (1994) The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. Journal of Plant Physiology, 144, 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81192-2.
  22. Lee S, Khanal A, Cho AH, Lee H, Kang M-S, Unno T, Hur H-G, Lee J-H (2019) Cupriavidus sp. strain Ni-2 resistant to high concentration of nickel and its genes responsible for the tolerance by genome comparison. Archives of Microbiology, 201, 1323-1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-019-01700-5.
  23. Schoenborn L, Yates PS, Grinton BE, Hugenholtz P, Janssen PH (2004) Liquid serial dilution is inferior to solid media for isolation of cultures representative of the phylum-level diversity of soil bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70, 4363-4366. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.7.4363-4366.2004.
  24. Arkhipova TN, Veselov SU, Melentiev AI, Martynenko EV, Kudoyarova GR (2005) Ability of bacterium Bacillus subtilis to produce cytokinins and to influence the growth and endogenous hormone content of lettuce plants. Plant and Soil, 272, 201-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-004-5047-x.
  25. Idris EE, Iglesias DJ, Talon M, Borriss R (2007) Tryptophan-dependent production of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) affects level of plant growth promotion by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 20, 619-626. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-20-6-0619.
  26. Valencia-Cantero E, Hernandez-Calderon E, Velazquez-Becerra C, Lopez-Meza JE, Alfaro-Cuevas R, LopezBucio J (2007) Role of dissimilatory fermentative iron-reducing bacteria in Fe uptake by common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants grown in alkaline soil. Plant and Soil, 291, 263-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9191-y.
  27. Gutierrez-Luna FM, Lopez-Bucio J, AltamiranoHernandez J, Valencia-Cantero E, de la Cruz HR, Macias-Rodriguez L (2010) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria modulate root-system architecture in Arabidopsis thaliana through volatile organic compound emission. Symbiosis, 51, 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-010-0066-2.
  28. Lee E-S, Song H-G (2010) Plant growth promotion by purple nonsulfur Rhodopseudomonas faecalis strains. Korean Journal of Microbiology, 46, 157-161.
  29. Raddadi N, Cherif A, Boudabous A, Daffonchio D (2008) Screening of plant growth promoting traits of Bacillus thuringiensis. Annals of Microbiology, 58, 47-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03179444.