DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relationship between the Performance Level and Achievement Goal Orientation on Youth Badminton Players

청소년 배드민턴 선수의 경기력 수준과 성취목표성향의 관계

  • Kim, Deokjin (Dept. of Sport & Health Care, Namseoul Univ)
  • 김덕진 (남서울대학교 스포츠건강관리학과)
  • Received : 2021.01.25
  • Accepted : 2021.02.08
  • Published : 2021.02.28

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between performance level and ego orientation and task orientation, which are sub-factors of achievement goal orientation, targeting the Korean youth badminton national team. Accordingly, two null hypotheses were established and tried to verify that there would be no difference in ego orientation and task orientation according to the performance level of the badminton youth representative players. A total of 92 middle and high school students were divided into upper and lower performance groups, and the differences between ego orientation and task orientation were investigated, respectively. For the measurement, We used sports achievement goal orientation (task and ego orientation in a sports questionnaire, TEOSQ). Data were analyzed by performing frequency analysis, reliability analysis, and independent t-test. As a result, there was no statistically significant difference in both the ego orientation and task orientation between the upper and lower groups of performance. We discussed based on the research results.

본 연구는 대한민국 청소년 배드민턴 국가대표 선수를 대상으로 그들의 경기력과 성취목표성향의 하위 요인인 자아성향과 과제성향에 어떤 관계가 있는지 알아보고자 수행되었다. 이에 배드민턴 청소년 대표 선수들의 경기력 수준에 따라 자아성향과 과제성향은 차이가 없을 것이라는 두 개의 영가설을 설정하고 이를 검증하고자 하였다. 연구대상으로는 2018년도 청소년 배드민턴 국가대표 하계 합숙훈련에 소집된 중,고등학생 92명으로 하였고, 이들의 학교급별 단식 전체리그 결과를 토대로 하여 경기력 상,하 집단으로 구분하여 자아성향과 과제성향의 차이를 각각 알아보았다. 검사도구로는 스포츠 성취목표지향성에 관한 검사지(Task & Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire, TEOSQ)를 사용하였다. 자료의 경향을 파악하기 위해서 빈도분석을 실시하였고 검사지의 신뢰도를 알아보기 위해서 신뢰도 분석(Cronbach's α)을 실시하였으며 마지막으로 경기력 집단 간 성취목표성향의 차이를 알아보기 위하여 독립 t검증을 실시하였다. 그 결과, 경기력 상집단과 하집단 간에 자아성향과 과제성향 두 요인 모두 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 연구결과를 토대로 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Atkinson, J. W. An Introduction to Motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, 1964.
  2. Atkinson, J. W. A Theory of Achievement Motivation. Krieger Pub Co, 1974.
  3. Dweck, C. S. Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press, 2000.
  4. Nicholls, J. G. The Competitive Ethos and Democratic Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
  5. Roberts, G. C. Motivation in Sport: Understanding and Enhancing the Motivation and Achievement of Children. Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology, 405-420, 1993.
  6. Dweck, C. S. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York, NY, US: Random House, 2006.
  7. Kim, Y. K., Kim, D. J., and Cho, S. H. The Effect of Squash player's Achievement Goal Orientation and Competitive Anxiety on Performance Self-Confidence. Journal of Coaching Development, 7(3), 291-300, 2006.
  8. Kim, D. M. The Study of High School Ju Do Players'Achievement Goal Orientation and Mental Health. Gyeongsang National University Graduate School, Unpublished Master Thesis, 2002.
  9. Duda, J. L., and Nicholls, J. G. Dimensions of Achievement Motivation in Schoolwork and Sport. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 290-299, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.290
  10. Kim, B. J. Goal Orientation as a Predictor of Sources of Enjoyment and Stress in Youth Sports. Korean Society of Sport Psychology, 12(1), 125-140, 2001.
  11. Moon, H. J. The Analysis of High School Taekwondo Player's Achievement Goal Orientation and Mental Health. Busan University Graduate Shcool. Unpublished Master Thesis, 2001.
  12. Kim, D. J. Difference of Optimism According to the Level of Performance : For the Korean Badminton National Youth Players. The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology, 6(1), 179-183, 2019. https://doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2020.6.1.179