대한건축학회논문집 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea)

  • 제37권3호
  • /
  • Pages.19-28
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2733-6239(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-6247(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

AHP기법을 활용한 BIM 업무효율 향상을 위한 정성적 요인의 중요도 평가 및 분석

Evaluation and Analysis of the Importance of Qualitative Factors for Improving BIM Work Efficiency Using AHP Method

  • 투고 : 2020.11.09
  • 심사 : 2021.02.18
  • 발행 : 2021.03.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Revitalization of BIM, starting with the guidelines of the domestic Public Procurement Service, is steadily increasing. On the other hand, it is difficult to effectively utilize BIM due to obstacles such as low level of awareness of BIM necessity, and lack of accessibility of BIM production tool education. The solution for this problem, the research of quantitative indicators preceded by comparing the existing method and the BIM method; however, the qualitative factors of work efficiency had not been considered. Accordingly, the study derives qualitative factors affecting efficiency of BIM work and evaluates the concernment of each factors. The establishment of qualitative factors and importance of assessment were conducted through expert advice and questionnaire; and the importance of each factor was analyzed through AHP technique. Importance is the priority for efficiency of work, and it presents an effective plan when establishing a BIM work plan.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi, H., Park, J., Kim, E., & Jun, H. (2020). A Basic Study on the Derivation of Qualitative and Quantitative Indicators for the Evaluation of Work Efficiency in BIM, Proceeding of Annual Conference of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 29(4)
  2. Chung, J., & Kim, Y. (2012). Analysis of Core Ability of BIM Manager, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Structure & Construction, 28(1), 175-182 https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_SC.2012.28.1.175
  3. D, Sarkar., H, Raghavendra., & M, Ruparelia. (2015). Role of Key performance Indicators for evaluating the usage of BIM as tool for Facility Management of Construction Projects, Journal of Civil Structural Engineering Research, 5(4), 370-378
  4. E, Forman., & K, Peniwati. (1998). Aggregating individual judgements and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.180, 165-169
  5. Kang, H. (2013). A Study on the Development of BIM Template to introduce of BIM in Small and Middle Architectural Design Firms using AHP method(master's thesis). Hanyang University, Seoul.
  6. Kim, S., Park, G., Song, B., Choi, C., & Chin, S. (2016). A Study on Setting Up Work Conditions for Improving Productivity of BIM-based Cost Estimation, Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 17(1), 56-65 https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2016.17.1.056
  7. Kim, W., Lee, B., & Kang, H. (2012). A Survey on the Utilization of BIM by Construction Companies and Its Implications, Construction & Economy Research Institute of Korea
  8. Lee, H. (2016b). BIM work Process and project execution status, EGA GROUP, Retrieved December 28, 2020 from https://prezi.com/bv_v8f_b30je/bim/
  9. Lee, J., Jung, J., & Oh, H. (2013). Work Efficiency Analysis of BIM Based Structural Drawing, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Structure & Construction, 29(6), 21-28 https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_SC.2013.29.6.21
  10. Lee, J., & Yi, J. (2011). A Study on BIM Capability Evaluation for Design Organizations, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning & Design, 27(6), 257-266
  11. Lee, Y. (2016a). An empirical Study on the efficiency of design document preparation applying BIM - Focused on office building design processes(master's thesis). The University of Seoul, Seoul.
  12. Ministry of SMEs and Startups. (2018). Survey on the Information Level of Korean Small and Medium Enterprise, Retrieved December 28, 2020 from https://www.mss.go.kr/site/smba/foffice/ex/statDB/StReportContentDetailView.do?gb=1&reSeq=1712
  13. S, Coates., & Y, Arayici. (2013). Operational Knowledge for BIM Adoption and Implementation for Lean Efficiency Gains, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 1(2), 1-22
  14. Roh, H. (2006). Public Policy Analysis, pybook, Seoul, p.247
  15. T.L, Saaty. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Mcgraw-Hill, New York
  16. Song, A. (2007). A Research to Decide Investment Priority of Information and Communication Budget by Using AHP(master's thesis). Daegu Catholic University, Gyeongsan.