Archives of Craniofacial Surgery (대한두개안면성형외과학회지)

Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (대한두개안면성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Head and neck reconstruction using free flaps: a 30-year medical record review

  • Suh, Joong Min (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Chung, Chul Hoon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Chang, Yong Joon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital)
  • Received : 2020.12.24
  • Accepted : 2021.02.09
  • Published : 2021.02.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The free flap surgical method is useful for the reconstruction of head and neck defects. This study retrospectively analyzed the results of head and neck reconstructions using various types of free flaps over the past 30 years. Methods: Between 1989 and 2018, a total of 866 free flap procedures were performed on 859 patients with head and neck defects, including 7 double free flaps. The causes of vascular crisis and salvage rate were analyzed, and the total flap survival rate calculated among these patients. Additionally, the survival and complication rates for each flap type were compared. Results: The 866 cases included 557 radial forearm flaps, 200 anterolateral thigh flaps, 39 fibular osteocutaneous flaps, and 70 of various other flaps. The incidence of the vascular crisis was 5.1%; its most common cause was venous thrombosis (52.3%). Salvage surgery was successful in 52.3% of patients, and the total flap survival rate was 97.6%. The success rate of the radial forearm flap was higher than of the anterolateral flap (p< 0.01), and the primary sites of malignancy were the tongue, tonsils, and hypopharynx, respectively. Conclusion: The free flap technique is the most reliable method for head and neck reconstruction; however, the radial forearm free flap showed the highest success rate (98.9%). In patients with malignancy, flap failure was more common in the anterolateral thigh (5.5%) and fibular (5.1%) flaps.

Keywords

References

  1. Daniel RK, Taylor GI. Distant transfer of an island flap by microvascular anastomoses: a clinical technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973;52:111-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197308000-00001
  2. Bianchi B, Copelli C, Ferrari S, Ferri A, Sesenna E. Free flaps: outcomes and complications in head and neck reconstructions. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2009;37:438-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2009.05.003
  3. Wu CC, Lin PY, Chew KY, Kuo YR. Free tissue transfers in head and neck reconstruction: complications, outcomes and strategies for management of flap failure: analysis of 2019 flaps in single institute. Microsurgery 2014;34:339-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.22212
  4. Eckardt A, Fokas K. Microsurgical reconstruction in the head and neck region: an 18-year experience with 500 consecutive cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2003;31:197-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(03)00039-8
  5. Wei FC, Demirkan F, Chen HC, Chuang DC, Chen SH, Lin CH, et al. The outcome of failed free flaps in head and neck and extremity reconstruction: what is next in the reconstructive ladder? Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:1154-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200110000-00007
  6. Nakatsuka T, Harii K, Asato H, Takushima A, Ebihara S, Kimata Y, et al. Analytic review of 2372 free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003;19:363-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-42630
  7. Classen DA, Ward H. Complications in a consecutive series of 250 free flap operations. Ann Plast Surg 2006;56:557-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000205830.39108.9a
  8. Suh JD, Sercarz JA, Abemayor E, Calcaterra TC, Rawnsley JD, Alam D, et al. Analysis of outcome and complications in 400 cases of microvascular head and neck reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:962-6. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.130.8.962
  9. Kim HS, Chung CH, Chang YJ. Free-flap reconstruction in recurrent head and neck cancer: a retrospective review of 124 cases. Arch Craniofac Surg 2020;21:27-34. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2019.00738
  10. Devine JC, Potter LA, Magennis P, Brown JS, Vaughan ED. Flap monitoring after head and neck reconstruction: evaluating an observation protocol. J Wound Care 2001;10:525-9. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2001.10.1.26037
  11. Simpson KH, Murphy PG, Hopkins PM, Batchelor AG. Prediction of outcomes in 150 patients having microvascular free tissue transfers to the head and neck. Br J Plast Surg 1996;49: 267-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1226(96)90154-X
  12. Jones NF, Johnson JT, Shestak KC, Myers EN, Swartz WM. Microsurgical reconstruction of the head and neck: interdisciplinary collaboration between head and neck surgeons and plastic surgeons in 305 cases. Ann Plast Surg 1996;36:37-43. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199601000-00008
  13. Pohlenz P, Klatt J, Schon G, Blessmann M, Li L, Schmelzle R. Microvascular free flaps in head and neck surgery: complications and outcome of 1000 flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;41:739-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.02.012
  14. Kubo T, Yano K, Hosokawa K. Management of flaps with compromised venous outflow in head and neck microsurgical reconstruction. Microsurgery 2002;22:391-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.10059
  15. Camaioni A, Loreti A, Damiani V, Bellioni M, Passali FM, Viti C. Anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap vs. radial forearm free-flap in oral and oropharyngeal reconstruction: an analysis of 48 flaps. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2008;28:7-12.
  16. Oranges CM, Ling B, Tremp M, Wettstein R, Kalbermatten DF, Schaefer DJ. Comparison of anterolateral thigh and radial forearm free flaps in head and neck reconstruction. In Vivo 2018; 32:893-7. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11325
  17. Young AMH, Bache S, Segaren N, Murphy S, Maraka J, Durrani AJ. Free flap selection and outcomes of soft tissue reconstruction following resection of intra-oral malignancy. Front Surg 2019;6:53. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2019.00053
  18. Liu WW, Li H, Guo ZM, Zhang Q, Yang AK, Liu XK, et al. Reconstruction of soft-tissue defects of the head and neck: radial forearm flap or anterolateral thigh flap? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011;268:1809-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1548-4
  19. Shanker MK, Rajan A, Hemant B, Kumar DA. Outcome of 1000 free flap head and neck reconstructions at a tertiary cancer care institute in India. Eur J Plast Surg 2021;44:25-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-020-01693-1
  20. Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Evans GR, Robb GL, et al. Choice of flap and incidence of free flap success. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;98:459-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199609000-00015
  21. Guillemaud JP, Seikaly H, Cote DW, Barber BR, Rieger JM, Wolfaardt J, et al. Double free-flap reconstruction: indications, challenges, and prospective functional outcomes. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;135:406-10. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2009.15
  22. Allen EV. Thromboangiitis obliterans: methods of diagnosis of chronic arterial lesions distal to the wrist with illustrative cases. Am J Med Sci 1929;178:237-44. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000441-192908000-00009
  23. Huang CH, Chen HC, Huang YL, Mardini S, Feng GM. Comparison of the radial forearm flap and the thinned anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap for reconstruction of tongue defects: an evaluation of donor-site morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114:1704-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000142476.36975.07

Cited by

  1. Reconstruction of a pathologic fracture following osteomyelitis of the mandible using a fibula osteocutaneous flap vol.22, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2020.00724
  2. Effects of perioperative radiation treatment on stricture and fistula formation in hypopharyngeal reconstruction: a meta-analysis vol.22, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2021.00080
  3. Anterior skull base reconstruction using an anterolateral thigh free flap vol.22, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2021.00290
  4. Reconstructive methods to resolve intractable fistulas that develop after radiation therapy in patients with head and neck cancer vol.22, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2021.00353
  5. Potential role of artificial intelligence in craniofacial surgery vol.22, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2021.00507