한국수자원학회논문집 (Journal of Korea Water Resources Association)

  • 제54권1호
  • /
  • Pages.49-60
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2799-8746(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2799-8754(eISSN)
한국수자원학회 (Korea Water Resources Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Fractal 나무의 개념을 기반으로 한 설마천 시험유역의 Fractal 차원 추정

Estimation of fractal dimension for Seolma creek experimental basin on the basis of fractal tree concept

  • 김주철 (충남대학교 국제수자원연구소) ;
  • 정관수 (충남대학교 토목공학과)
  • Kim, Joo-Cheol (International Water Resources Research Institute, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jung, Kwan Sue (Department of Civil Engineering, Chungnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2020.06.12
  • 심사 : 2020.12.01
  • 발행 : 2021.01.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 Fractal 나무의 개념을 이용하여 자연유역의 두 가지 개별적 Fractal 차원을 추정하는 방법을 제시하고자 한다. 이를 위하여 Fractal 나무의 성장 과정을 기반으로 유역 내부에서 발생 가능한 모든 배수 경로를 추출하여 완전한 배수망을 구성하고 이에 해당하는 Fractal 특성을 분석해 보고자 한다. 유역 내부에서 Fractal 나무의 성장 과정은 하천 유동의 특성을 가지는 배수 경로에서만 제한적으로 나타날 수 있다. 소규모 유역의 경우 Fractal 나무의 성장 단계에 따라 망상 구조의 분기 특성이 단일 하천 구간의 사행 특성에 비하여 민감하게 변화하여 단일한 망상 구조 속에서도 다양한 분기 구조가 생성될 수 있다. 따라서 소규모 유역을 대상으로 한 망상 구조에 대한 Fractal 차원은 단일한 수치의 고정된 형태보다는 범위의 형태로 취급되어야 하는 것이 타당한 것으로 판단된다. 또한, 소규모 유역의 배수 구조에 대한 분석에는 지형도나 수치지도로부터 추출한 하천망보다 본 연구에서 제시한 Fractal 나무의 성장에 따른 망상 구조와 같은 정보가 더 유용할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

This study presents a methodology to estimate two distinct fractal dimensions of natural river basin by using fractal tree concept. To this end, an analysis is performed on fractal features of a complete drainage network which consists of all possible drainage paths within a river basin based on the growth process of fractal tree. The growth process of fractal tree would occur only within the limited drainage paths possessing stream flow features in a river basin. In the case of small river basin, the bifurcation process of network is more sensitive to the growth step of fractal tree than the meandering process of stream segment, so that various bifurcation structures could be generated in a single network. Therefore, fractal dimension of network structure for small river basin should be estimated in the form of a range not a single figure. Furthermore, the network structures with fractal tree from this study might be more useful information than stream networks from a topographic or digital map for analysis of drainage structure on small river basin.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Agnese, C., D'Asaro, F., Grosso, G., and Rosso, R. (1996). "Scaling properties of topologically random channel network." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 187, pp. 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03095-8
  2. Beer, T., and Borgas, M. (1993). "Horton's law and the Fractal nature of streams." Water Resources Research, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 1475-1487. https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR02731
  3. Dodds, P.S., and Rothman, D.H. (2000). "Scaling, universality, and geomorphology." Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Vol. 28, pp. 571-610. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.28.1.571
  4. Godsey, S.E., and Kirchner, J.W. (2014). "Dynamic, discontinuous stream networks: hydrologically driven variations in active drainage density, flowing channels and stream order." Hydrological Process, Vol. 28, pp. 5791-5803. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10310
  5. Hack, J.T. (1957). Studies of longitudinal profiles in Virginia and Maryland. US Geological Survey Professional Paper, 294-B, United States Geological Survey, Reston, V.A., U.S., pp. 45-97.
  6. Hergarten, S. (2002). Self-organized criticality in earth system, Springer-Verlag, N.Y., U.S.
  7. Hooshyar, M., Kim, S., Wang, D., and Medeiros, S.C. (2015). "Wet channel network extraction by integrating LiDAR intensity and elevation data." Water Resources Research, Vol. 51, pp. 10029-10046. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018021
  8. Horton, R.E. (1945). "Erosional development of streams and their drainage basin: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology." Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 275-370. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1945)56[275:EDOSAT]2.0.CO;2
  9. Ijjasz-Vasquez, E.J., and Bras, R.L. (1995). "Scaling regimes of local slope versus contributing area in digital elevation models." Geomorphology, Vol. 12, pp. 299-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-555X(95)00012-T
  10. Kim, J.C., and Jung, K. (2015). "Fractal tree analysis of drainage patterns." Water Resources Management, Vol. 29, pp. 1217-1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0869-7
  11. Kim, J.C., and Kim, J.H. (2007). "Morphological representation of channel network by dint of DEM." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 287-297. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2007.40.4.287
  12. Kim, J.C., and Kim, J.H. (2008). "The geometric properties of the drainage structures based on fractal tree." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 41, No. 8, pp. 797-806. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2008.41.8.797
  13. Kim, J.C., and Lee, S.J. (2009). "Hack's law and the geometric properties of catchment plan-form." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 42, No. 9, pp. 691-702. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2009.42.9.691
  14. La Barbera, P., and Rosso, R. (1989). "On the fractal dimension of stream networks." Water Resources Research, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 735-741. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR025i004p00735
  15. Lee, G., and Kim, J.C. (2011). "Comparative analysis of geomorphologic characteristics of DEM-based drainage networks." Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000295
  16. Leopold, L.B., and Miller, J.P. (1956). Ephemeral streams-hydraulic factors and their relation to the drainage net. US Geological Survey Professional Paper, 282-A, United States Geological Survey, Reston, V.A., U.S., pp. 1-42.
  17. Mandelbrot, B.B. (1982). The Fractal geometry of nature, W. H. Freeman, N.Y., U.S.
  18. Maritan, A., Rinaldo, A., Rigon, A., Giacometti, A., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (1996). "Scaling laws for river networks." Physical Review E, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 1510-1515. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.53.1510
  19. Montgomery, D.R., and Foufoula-Georgiou, E. (1993). "Channel network source representation using digital elevation models." Water Resources Research, Vol. 29, No. 12, pp. 3925-3934. https://doi.org/10.1029/93WR02463
  20. Moussa, R. (2003). "On morphometric properties of basins, scale effects and hydrological response." Hydrological Processes, Vol. 17, pp. 33-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1114
  21. Moussa, R., and Bocquillon, C. (1996). "Fractal analyses of tree-like networks from digital elevation model data." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 187, pp. 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03093-4
  22. Newman, W.I., Turcotte, D.L., and Gabrielov, A.M. (1997). "Fractal trees with side branching." Fractals, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 603-614. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X97000486
  23. O'Callaghan, J.F., and Mark, D.M. (1984). "The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data." Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, Vol. 28, pp. 324-344.
  24. Peckham, S.D. (1995). "New results for self-similar trees with applications to river networks." Water Resources Research, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 1023-1029. https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR03155
  25. Puente, C.E., and Castillo, P.A. (1996). "On the fractal structure of networks and dividers within a watershed." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 187, pp. 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03094-6
  26. Rigon, R., Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Maritan, A., Giacometti, A., Tarboton, D.G., and Rinaldo, A. (1996). "On Hack's law." Water Resources Research, Vol. 32, No. 11, pp. 3367-3374. https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR02397
  27. Rosso, R., Bacchi, B., and La Barbera, P. (1991). "Fractal relation of mainstream length to catchment area in river networks." Water Resources Research, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 381-387. https://doi.org/10.1029/90WR02404
  28. Saunders, W.K., and Maidment, D.R. (1996). A GIS assessment of nonpoint source pollution in the San Antonio-Nueces Coastal basin. Center for Research in Water Resources, University of Texas, Austin, T.X., U.S.
  29. Schumm, S.A. (1956). "Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey." Geological society of America bulletin, Vol. 67, No. 5, pp. 597-646. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1956)67[597:eodsas]2.0.co;2
  30. Shreve, R.L. (1966). "Statistical law of stream numbers." Journal of Geology, Vol. 74, pp. 17-37. https://doi.org/10.1086/627137
  31. Smart, J.S. (1972). "Channel networks." Advanced in Hydrosciense, Vol. 8, pp. 350-346.
  32. Tarboton, D.G. (1996). "Fractal river networks, Horton's laws and Tokunaga cyclicity." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 187, pp. 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03089-2
  33. Tarboton, D.G. (2003). "Terrain analysis using digital elevation models in hydrology." 23rd ESRI International Users Conference, San Diego, C.A., U.S.
  34. Tarboton, D.G., Bras, R.L., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (1988). "The fractal nature of river networks." Water Resources Research, Vol. 24, No. 8, pp. 1317-1322. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR024i008p01317
  35. Tarboton, D.G., Bras, R.L., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (1992). "A physical basis for drainage density." Geomophology, Vol. 5, pp. 59-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-555X(92)90058-V
  36. Tokunaga, E. (1966). "The composition of drainage network in Toyohira River basin and Horton's first law." Geophysical Bulletin of Hokkaido University, Vol. 15, pp. 1-19.
  37. Yang, S., and Paik, K. (2017). "New findings on river network organization: Law of eigenarea and relationships among Hortonian scaling ratios." Fractals, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1750029.