Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine (대한예방의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Particle Filtration Efficiency Testing of Sterilization Wrap Masks

  • Chau, Destiny F. (Department of Anesthesiology, Arkansas Children's Hospital, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences) ;
  • O'Shaughnessy, Patrick (Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, The University of Iowa) ;
  • Schmitz, Michael L. (Department of Anesthesiology, Arkansas Children's Hospital, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences)
  • Received : 2020.08.11
  • Accepted : 2020.11.30
  • Published : 2021.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: Non-traditional materials are used for mask construction to address personal protective equipment shortages during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Reusable masks made from surgical sterilization wrap represent such an innovative approach with social media frequently referring to them as "N95 alternatives." This material was tested for particle filtration efficiency and breathability to clarify what role they might have in infection prevention and control. Methods: A heavyweight, double layer sterilization wrap was tested when new and after 2, 4, 6, and 10 autoclave sterilizing cycles and compared with an approved N95 respirator and a surgical mask via testing procedures using a sodium chloride aerosol for N95 efficiency testing similar to 42 CFR 84.181. Pressure testing to indicate breathability was also conducted. Results: The particle filtration efficiency for the sterilization wrap ranged between 58% to 66%, with similar performance when new and after sterilizing cycles. The N95 respirator and surgical mask performed at 95% and 68% respectively. Pressure drops for the sterilization wrap, N95 and surgical mask were 10.4 mmH2O, 5.9 mmH2O, and 5.1 mmH2O, respectively, well below the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health limits of 35 mmH2O during initial inhalation and 25 mmH2O during initial exhalation. Conclusions: The sterilization wrap's particle filtration efficiency is much lower than a N95 respirator, but falls within the range of a surgical mask, with acceptable breathability. Performance testing of non-traditional mask materials is crucial to determine potential protection efficacy and for correcting misinterpretation propagated through popular media.

Keywords

References

  1. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA factsheet: healthcare workplaces classified as very high or high exposure risk for pandemic influenza [cited 2020 Nov 19]. Available from: https://www.osha.gov/Publications/exposure-risk-classification-factsheet.html.
  2. University of Florida. Mask alternative; 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 29]. Available from: https://anest.ufl.edu/clinical-divisions/mask-alternative/.
  3. Tasnim S, Hossain MM, Mazumder H. Impact of rumors and misinformation on COVID-19 in social media. J Prev Med Public Health 2020;53(3):171-174. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.20.094
  4. Blue Thunder General Topics. An introduction into SMS material [cited 2020 Nov 19]. Available from: https://bluethundertechnologies.com/introduction-sms-material/.
  5. Unified Patents. US-5635134-A - method of sterilizing an article [cited 2020 Nov 19]. Available from: https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/patents/patent/US-5635134-A.
  6. Juang PS, Tsai P. N95 respirator cleaning and reuse methods proposed by the inventor of the N95 mask material. J Emerg Med 2020;58(5):817-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.04.036
  7. Qian Y, Willeke K, Grinshpun SA, Donnelly J, Coffey CC. Performance of N95 respirators: filtration efficiency for airborne microbial and inert particles. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1998;59(2): 128-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15428119891010389
  8. Balazy A, Toivola M, Reponen T, Podgorski A, Zimmer A, Grinshpun SA. Manikin-based performance evaluation of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators challenged with nanoparticles. Ann Occup Hyg 2006;50(3):259-269. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mei058
  9. U.S. Government Information. 42 CFR 84.181- non-powered air-purifying particulate filter efficiency level determination [cited 2020 Jul 29]. Available from: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2009-title42-vol1/pdf/CFR-2009-title42-vol1-part84-subpartK.pdf.
  10. Kimberly-Clark. Bacterial filtration efficiency: Kimguard OneStep* sterilization wrap compared to medline Gemini sterilization wrap [cited 2020 Nov 9]. Available from: https://www.halyardhealth.in/media/287706/h0486_0701_medlinevskc.pdf.
  11. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Recognized Consensus Standards: ASTM F2101-19 standard test method for evaluating the bacterial filtration efficiency (BFE) of medical face mask materials, using a biological aerosol of Staphylococcus aureus [cited 2020 Jul 29]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfStandards/detail.cfm?standard__identification_no=39935.
  12. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Fit testing procedures (mandatory) [cited 2020 Nov 19]. Available from: https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.134AppA.
  13. Halyard Health. Better care deserves a new package design [cited 2020 Nov 19]. Available from: https://www.halyardhealth.com/media/188267/package-change-guide_sterilization_poster.pdf.
  14. Oberg T, Brosseau LM. Surgical mask filter and fit performance. Am J Infect Control 2008;36(4):276-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2007.07.008
  15. Davidson CS, Green CF, Gibbs SG, Schmid KK, Panlilio AL, Jensen PA, et al. Performance evaluation of selected N95 respirators and surgical masks when challenged with aerosolized endospores and inert particles. J Occup Environ Hyg 2013; 10(9):461-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2013.818243
  16. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. N95 respirators, surgical masks, and face masks [cited 2020 Nov 19]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/personal-protective-equipment-infection-control/n95-respirators-surgical-masks-and-face-masks.
  17. U.S. Government Information. 42 CFR 84.180 airflow resistance tests [cited 2020 Nov 19]. Available from: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2007-title42-vol1/pdf/CFR-2007-title42-vol1-sec84-180.pdf.
  18. Janssen LL, Anderson NJ, Cassidy PE, Weber RA, Nelson TJ. Interpretation of inhalation airflow measurements for respirator design and testing. J Int Soc Respir Prot 2005;22(3/4):122.