DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Measuring the Effectiveness of an Ecosystem Service to Regulate Air Quality in Wetland, South Korea

  • Received : 2020.09.11
  • Accepted : 2020.12.17
  • Published : 2021.02.01

Abstract

This study aimed to verify the suitability of an air quality regulating service for wetland ecosystem service evaluation by investigating the effect of reducing particulate matter (PM) on vegetation in wetlands. We installed tunnel-type experimental plots at Yonghwasil Pond in the National Institute of Ecology and set up the input and output of PM by applying the natural vegetation of the relevant wetlands. We took measurements by replicating four different conditions four times each. The air quality regulating service in each experimental plot was measured based on PM10 concentration; further, the difference between the input and the output concentration of PM passing through the Phragmites australis community tunnel was measured using a light scattering method. For the Phragmites australis community in the outdoor conditions and bare land, the PM concentration was measured with the same specifications as tunnel-type experimental plots without setting up the input and output. For the tunnel-type experimental plots, PM10 concentration was significantly lower in the output than in the input. Furthermore, in the outdoor conditions, a comparison between the Phragmites australis community and bare land showed that the concentration was relatively low in the former than in the latter. This confirmed the PM reducing effect due to the blockage and absorption of PM depending on the growth of Phragmites australis. Based on the results of this study, we assessed the air quality regulating service in wetlands as an evaluation indicator.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, H.J., Youn, D.O., Ha, J.S., Shin, Y.S., Gong, S.Y., Moon, N.K., et al. (2011). Evaluation of Impacts of Climate Change on Air Pollution and Health, Incheon: National Institute of Environmental.
  2. Bae, S.H., and Hong, Y.C. (2018). Health effects of particulate matter. Journal of the Korean Medical Association, 61, 749-755. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2018.61.12.749
  3. Cha, J.G., Choi, T.Y., Moon, H.G., Kang, D.I., and Park, E.J. (2018). Study on the Regulating Function of Particulate Matter in Urban Green Space, Seocheon: National Institute of Ecology.
  4. de Groot, R., Stuip, M., Finlayson, M., and Davidson, N. (2006). Valuing Wetlands: Guidance for Valuing the Benefits Derived from Wetland Ecosystem Services, Gland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat.
  5. Fuchs, N.A. (1964). The Mechanics of Aerosols, Oxford: Pergamon.
  6. Government Performance Evaluation Committee. (2020). 2019 Job/major government project assessment: Report on each major government project. Office for Government Policy Coordination.
  7. Gu, B.H., You, Y.H., Kim, H.D., Kim, J.G., Yang, H.S., Rho, P.H., et al. (2013). Understanding of Wetland, Changnyeong: Ministry of Environment.
  8. Guan, H., Feng, X., Zhang, J., Niu, S., and Han, Z. (2019). Phragmites communis leaves with anisotropy, superhydrophobicity and self-cleaning effect and biomimetic polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) replicas. Coatings, 9, 541. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9090541
  9. Hails, A.J. (1997). Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention: the Role of the Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise Use of Biodiversity, Gland: Ramsar Convention Bureau.
  10. He, C., Qiu, K., and Pott, R. (2020). Reduction of urban trafficrelated particulate matter-leaf trait matters. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 27, 5825-5844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07160-0
  11. Interagency. (2019). Master Plan on Management of Particulate Matter (2020-2024), Sejong: Ministry of Trade Industry and Energy.
  12. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). (2016). Outdoor Air Pollution IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans Volume 109, Lyon: IARC.
  13. Jang, A.S. (2014). Impact of particulate matter on health. Journal of the Korean Medical Association, 57, 763-768. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2014.57.9.763
  14. Janse, J.H., van Dam, A.A., Hes, E.M.A., de Klein, J.J.M., Finlayson, C.M., Janssen, A.B.G., et al. (2019). Towards a global model for wetlands ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 36, 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.002
  15. Jo, H.K., Cho, Y.H., and Ahn, T.W. (2002). Capacity and value of atmospheric purification for Namsan Nature Park in Seoul. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, 16, 172-178.
  16. Joo, W.Y., Kwon, H.S., Jang, I.Y., Jung, P.M., Kim, M.H., Park, H.J., et al. (2017). Establishment of Ecosystem Services Assessment Framework at National Level, Seocheon: National Institute of Ecology.
  17. Joo, W.Y., Kwon, H.S., Jang, I.Y., Jung, P.M., Park, H.J., Kim, J.I., et al. (2018). Assessment of Key Ecosystem Assets and their Services and Development of Conservation Strategies, Seocheon: National Institute of Ecology.
  18. Joo, W.Y., Yeo, I.A., Jang, I.Y., Jung, P.M., Park, H.J., Kim, J.I., et al. (2019). A Guideline for Ecosystem Services Assessment of Wetland Protected Areas, Seocheon: National Institute of Ecology.
  19. Koo, B.H., Yoo, Y.H., Kim, H.D., Kim, J.K., Yang, H.S., Rho, P.H., et al. (2013). Understanding of Wetland, Changnyeong: Ministry of Environment.
  20. Kwon, K.J., and Park, B.J. (2018). Particulate matter removal of indoor plants, Dieffenbachia amoena 'Marianne' and Spathiphyllum spp. according to light intensity. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 46, 62-68. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2018.46.2.062
  21. Lee, S.H. (2018). Direction for research and adaptive measures in healthcare after the announcement of the 9.26 comprehensive plan on management of particulate matter. Health and Welfare Issue and Focus, 346, 1-8.
  22. Manes, F., Marando, F., Capotorti, G., Blasi, C., Salvatori, E., Fusaro, L., et al. (2016). Regulating ecosystem services of forests in ten Italian metropolitan cities: air quality improvement by PM10 and O3 removal. Ecological Indicators, 67, 425-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.009
  23. McInnes, R.J. (2013). Recognizing ecosystem services from wetlands of international importance: an example from Sussex, UK. Wetlands, 33, 1001-1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-013-0458-1
  24. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Wetlands and Water: Synthesis, Washington: World Resources Institute.
  25. Ministry of Environment. (2016). You See What You Know: What is Particulate Matter? Sejong: Ministry of Environment.
  26. Ministry of Environment. (2018). Wetland Conservation Plan (2018-2022), Sejong: Ministry of Environment.
  27. Myong, J.P. (2016). Health effects of particulate matter. Korea Journal of Medicine, 91, 106-113. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjm.2016.91.2.106
  28. National Institute of Forest Science (2019). New Project Guidelines for (Particulate Matter Reduction) Urban Forest Formation and Management, Daejeon: Korea Forest Service.
  29. Novitzki, R.P., Smith, R.D., and Fretwell, J.D. (2001). Restoration, creation, and recovery of wetlands wetland functions, values, and assessment. Retrieved Sep 1, 2020 from http://water.usgs.gov/nwsum/WSP2425/functions.html.
  30. Nowak, D., and Heisler, G. (2010). Air Quality Effects of Urban Trees and Parks, Ashburn: National Recreation and Parks Association Research Series.
  31. Qiu, D., Liu, J., Zhu, L., Mo, L., and Zhang, Z. (2015). Particulate matter assessment of a wetland in Beijing. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 36, 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.04.016
  32. Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. (2011). Wetland Ecosystem Services- an Introduction, Gland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat.
  33. Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. (2018). Global Wetland Outlook: State of the World's Wetlands and their Services to People, Gland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat.
  34. Roucoux, K.H., Lawson, I.T., Baker, T.R., Del Castillo Torres, D., Draper, F.C., Lahteenoja, O., et al. (2017). Threats to intact tropical peatlands and opportunities for their conservation. Conservation Biology, 31, 1283-1292. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12925
  35. Rural Development Administration. (2019). Plants are effective in reducing indoor particulate matter: 3-5 pots of plants with 1㎡ leaf area in the living room (20 ㎡) reduce ultrafine particles by 20%. Retrieved Sep 1, 2020 from http://www.rda.go.kr/board/board.do?mode=view&prgId=day_farmprmninfoEntry&dataNo=100000753646.
  36. Russi, D., ten Brink, P., Farmer, A., Badura, T., Coates, D., Forster, J., et al. (2013). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for Water and Wetlands, Gland: Ramsar Secretariat.
  37. Son, G.Y., and Kim, J.G. (2020). Assessing removal effects on particulate matters using artificial wetland modules. Journal of Wetlands Research, 22, 24-30. https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2020.22.1.24