DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

전남지역 오리 사육시설 실태 조사 및 분석

Investigations and Analyses of Duck Breeding Facilities in Jeollanam-do Province, Korea

  • Kwon, Kyeong-seok (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Yang, Kayoung (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Jong-bok (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Jung-kon (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Jang, Donghwa (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Choi, Sungmin (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Sang-yeon (Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2020.10.23
  • 심사 : 2020.12.04
  • 발행 : 2021.01.31

초록

Number of duck and its breeding facilities have been steadily decreasing for financial and social issues in Korea. Therefore, the 'turning point' for duck industry is strongly demanded. In this study, the questionary survey was carried out to provide backgrounds for developing policy and technology for duck breeding farms. The questionary survey aimed to investigate the information of operation strategy of farm, ventilation, cooling and heating. The total number of survey respondents was 74. In case of facility type, 55.4% of respondents stated they used greenhouse type, 31.3% for winch-curtain type, and 2.7% for windowless type (mechanically ventilated facility). More than 85% of the facilities were using 'natural ventilation', it meant that these situation can restrict the not only environmental control but also the supply policy for 'smart farm' of the Government. 44.6% used the combination of the cross-ventilation method and roof-ventilation method for ventilation operation in summer season, and 31.1% followed only the cross-ventilation method. In case of winter season, 36.5% used the cross-ventilation method, and 33.3% used the combination of cross and roof-ventilation, method. For the ventilation strategy, about 86.5% depended on farmer's experience. In case of heating and cooling, 79.7% were using kerosene heater for winter season, and 43.2% were using mist-spray for summer season, respectively. More than 75% stated that cooling and heating strategies were based on farmer's experience. From the analyses of the survey results, a few proposals for developing policy and technology for duck breeding farm was suggested.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bang, H. T., D. W. Kim, J. Hwangbo, J. C. Na, H. K. Kang, M. J. Kim, M. M. H. Mushtaq, R. Parv in, H. C. Choi, S. B. Lee, M. Kang, and J. H. Kim, 2013. Effect of various forms of floor system on performance of meat-type duck and environments of duck house. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 40(3): 253-262 (in Korean). doi:10.5536/KJPS.2013. 40.3.253.
  2. Bang, H. T., J. C. Na, H. C. Choi, H. S. Chae, H. K. Kang, D. W. Kim, M. J. Kim, O. S. Suh, S. B. Park, and Y. H. Choi, 2010. A comparative study on performances and carcass traits in three major meat-type duck strains in Korea. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 37(4): 389-398 (in Korean). doi:10.5536/KJPS.2010.37.4.389.
  3. Choi, H. C. 2007. Productivity of poultry according to type of bedding materials. Monthly Poultry(May), Seoul, Korea.
  4. De Jong, I. C., H. Gunnink, and J. van Harn, 2014. Wet litter not only induces footpad dermatitis bul also reduces overall welfare, technical performance, and carcass yield in broiler chicken. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 23: 51-58. doi:10.3382/japr.2013-00803.
  5. Dunlop, M. W., A. F. Moss, P. J. Groves, S. J. Wilkinson, R. M. Stuerz, and P. H. Selle, 2016. The multidimensional casual factors of 'wet litter' in chicken-meat production. Science of the Total Environment 562(2016): 766-776. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.147.
  6. Hong, E. C., H. J. Choo, S. H. Kim, C. D. Kim, H. K. Kim, H. C. Choi, and K. N. Heo, 2014. Laying performance of Korean Native breeder ducks for producing Korean Native commercial ducks. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 41(1): 69-75 (in Korean). doi:10.5536/KJPS.2014.41.1.69.
  7. Jang, W. W., T. H. Chung, and I. H. Choi, 2019. Growth performance and economic evaluation of insect feed powder-fed ducks. Journal of Environmental Science International 28(8): 709-712 (in Korean). doi:10.5322/JESI.2019.28.8.709.
  8. Kim, H. K, B. S. Kang, J. Hwangbo, C. D. Kim, K. N. Heo, H. J. Choo, D. S. Park, O. S. Suh, and E. C. Hong, 2012a. The study on growth performance and carcass yield of meat type Korean native. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 39(1): 45-52 (in Korean). doi:10.5536/KJPS.2012.39.1.045.
  9. Kim, J. H., D. W. Kim, H. G. Kang, M. J. Kim, J. C. Na, J. Hwangbo, R. Parvin, H. C. Choi, and C. B. Yang, 2012b, Effects of protein of feed materials on productivity of Pekin duck. Proceeding of Korean Journal of Poultry Science 163-165 (in Korean).
  10. Mayne, R. K., R. W. Else, and P. M. Hocking, 2007. High litter moisture alone is sufficient to cause footpad dermatitis in growing turkeys. British Poultry Science 48: 538-545. doi:10.1080/00071660701573045.
  11. Yoo, Y. H., 2016. Investigation of status of duck breeding facility, 2. Wanju-gun, Jeollabuk-do, National Institute of Animal Science.
  12. National Institute of Animal Science, 2020. Livestock Statistics 30, 2. Wanju-gun, Jeollabuk-do, Korea.
  13. Statistics Korea, http://www.kosta.go.kr. Accessed 27. Sep. 2020.