References
- Chang C, Liu SS, Roberts WE. Primary failure rate for 1680 extra-alveolar mandibular buccal shelf mini-screws placed in movable mucosa or attached gingiva. Angle Orthod 2015;85:905-10. https://doi.org/10.2319/092714.695.1
- Suh HY, Lee SJ, Park HS. Use of mini-implants to avoid maxillary surgery for Class III mandibular prognathic patient: a long-term post-retention case. Korean J Orthod 2014;44:342-9. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2014.44.6.342
- Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod 1997;31:763-7.
- Ramirez-Ossa DM, Escobar-Correa N, RamirezBustamante MA, Agudelo-Suarez AA. An umbrella review of the effectiveness of temporary anchorage devices and the factors that contribute to their success or failure. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2020;20:101402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2020.101402
- Rao P, Gill A. Primary stability: the password of implant integration. J Dent Implant 2012;2:103-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-6781.102223
- Migliorati M, Benedicenti S, Signori A, Drago S, Barberis F, Tournier H, et al. Miniscrew design and bone characteristics: an experimental study of primary stability. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:228-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.029
- Ozdemir F, Tozlu M, Germec-Cakan D. Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different facial types. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:190-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.09.013
- Farnsworth D, Rossouw PE, Ceen RF, Buschang PH. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:495-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.057
- Yang L, Li F, Cao M, Chen H, Wang X, Chen X, et al. Quantitative evaluation of maxillary interradicular bone with cone-beam computed tomography for bicortical placement of orthodontic mini-implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;147:725-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.02.018
- Becker K, Unland J, Wilmes B, Tarraf NE, Drescher D. Is there an ideal insertion angle and position for orthodontic mini-implants in the anterior palate? A CBCT study in humans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019;156:345-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.09.019
- Murugesan A, Sivakumar A. Comparison of bone thickness in infrazygomatic crest area at various miniscrew insertion angles in Dravidian population - A cone beam computed tomography study. Int Orthod 2020;18:105-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2019.12.001
- Elshebiny T, Palomo JM, Baumgaertel S. Anatomic assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for miniscrew insertion in white patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:505-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.014
- Nucera R, Lo Giudice A, Bellocchio AM, Spinuzza P, Caprioglio A, Perillo L, et al. Bone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults. Angle Orthod 2017;87:745-51. https://doi.org/10.2319/011117-34.1
- Kim YH. Overbite depth indicator with particular reference to anterior open-bite. Am J Orthod 1974;65:586-611. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(74)90255-3
- Kim YH, Vietas JJ. Anteroposterior dysplasia indicator: an adjunct to cephalometric differential diagnosis. Am J Orthod 1978;73:619-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(78)90223-3
- Baumgaertel S, Hans MG. Buccal cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:230-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.045
- Wu TY, Kuang SH, Wu CH. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:1595-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.015
- Huang C, Chang CH, Roberts WE. 3D Cortical Bone Anatomy of the Mandibular Buccal Shelf: a CBCT study to define sites for extra-alveolar bone screws to treat Class III malocclusion. Int J Orthod Implantol 2016;41:74-82.
- Kolge NE, Patni VJ, Potnis SS. Tomographic mapping of buccal shelf area for optimum placement of bone screws: a three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography evaluation. APOS Trends Orthod 2019;9:241-5. https://doi.org/10.25259/APOS_20_2019
- Alves N, de Oliveira Nascimento CM. [Study of the mucosa thickness of the retromolar triangle to facilitate the installation planning of mini-implants in the region]. Int J Odontostomatol 2012;6:175-9. Portugues. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-381X2012000200010
- Lin J, White LW, Thavarungkul R. Creative orthodontics: blending the Damon System & TADs to manage difficult malocclusions. 3rd ed. Taipei: Yong Chieh Enterprise Co.; 2017. p. 339.
- Plaza SP, Reimpell A, Silva J, Montoya D. Relationship between skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions with vertical skeletal pattern. Dental Press J Orthod 2019;24:63-72. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.24.4.063-072.oar