연구윤리 (Journal of Research and Publication Ethics)

한국유통과학회 (Korea Distribution Science Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ethical Considerations in the Healthcare Field: A Focus on Global Health

  • 투고 : 2021.03.06
  • 심사 : 2021.03.30
  • 발행 : 2021.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This paper aimed to examine the ethical considerations that are the basis for many functions in the healthcare field. The key ethical values in global health, as well as future considerations imperative to this area, were observed. Research design, data and methodology: The current study utilized the past literature studies that were examined in the field of global health. An overview of the role of ethics in the healthcare field, as well as important considerations that needed to be taken into account in order to provide advancements in this area, were investigated. Results: Ethics are an important set of principles that guides humankind into the right conduct or action to better society and each other. Ethical values are one of the pinnacle points for any healthcare provider, as healthcare is not only considered from the aspect of patient health and well-being, but also in its role of keeping ethical guidelines to achieve the best possible care for a patient. Conclusions: A comprehensive understanding of healthcare is needed in order to tackle next generational challenges in global health. These ethical considerations will inevitably play a significant role in harnessing the patient-healthcare professional relationships as well as care for the shortening of a global disparity on healthcare.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bensimon, C. A., & Benatar, S. R. (2006). Developing sustainability: a new metaphor for progress, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 27(1), 59-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-005-5754-1
  2. Birn, A. (2009). The stages of international (global) health: histories of success or successes of history? Global Public Health, 4(1), 50-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441690802017797
  3. Deber, R. B. (2008). Access without appropriateness: Chicken Little in charge? Healthcare Policy, 4(1), 23-29. PMID: 19377338; PMCID: PMC2645207.
  4. Emanuel, E. J., Wendler, D., & Grady, C. (2000). What makes clinical research ethical. JAMA, 283(20), 2701-2711. doi:10.1001/jama.283.20.2701
  5. Epstein, B., & Turner, M. (2015). The nursing code of ethics: Its value, its history. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 20(2), 4. DOI: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol20No02Man04
  6. London, A.J. (2019). Social value, clinical equipoise, and research in a public health emergency. Bioethics, 33(3):326-334. DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12467
  7. Molyneux M. (2017). New ethical considerations in vaccine trials. Hum Vaccin Immunother, 13(9), 2160-2163. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1272744
  8. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Health and Medicine Division, Board on Health Sciences Policy, et al. Integrating clinical research into epidemic response. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US), 2017. ISBN-10: 0-309-45776-9
  9. Ostman L, Nasman Y, Eriksson K, & Nystrom L. (2019). Ethos: The heart of ethics and health. Nursing Ethics, 26(1), 26-36. DOI: 10.1177/0969733017695655
  10. Plotkin S, Robinson JM, Cunningham G, et al. (2017). The complexity and cost of vaccine manufacturing - An overview. Vaccine, 35(33), 4064-4071. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.06.003
  11. Powers, M., & Fadan, R. (2006). Social justice: The mortal foundations of public health and public health policy. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780195375138
  12. Schwartz JL. (2018). The Spanish flu, epidemics, and the turn to biomedical responses. American Journal of Public Health, 108(11), 1455-1458. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304581
  13. Tejada de Rivero, D. (2003). Alma Ata Revisited. Perspectives in Health Magazine, The Magazine of the Pan American Health Organization, 8(2).
  14. Verweij, M., & Dawson, A. (2007). The meaning of "public" in public health, Ethics, Prevention and Public Health, Clarendon Press.