대한심미치과학회지 (Journal of the Korean Academy of Esthetic Dentistry)

대한심미치과학회 (Korean Academy of Esthetic Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

3D 프린터의 임상적 활용

Clinical use of 3D printer

  • 이상엽 (삼성서울병원 치과보철과)
  • Lee, Sang-Yub (Samsung medical center, Department of prosthodontics)
  • 투고 : 2021.10.18
  • 심사 : 2021.11.12
  • 발행 : 2021.11.21
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

치과 영역에 디지털 시스템의 유입은 치과의사와 치과기공사에게 큰 영향을 끼쳤다. 그리고 이전 보다 향상된 정확도와 편리함 그리고 업무 효율성 증대를 가져왔다. 그러나 디지털은 모든 것을 해결해주지 못하며 분명 한계도 있다. 따라서 임상가는 전통정식 방식과 디지털 방식의 장단점에 대해 분명히 이해하고 두 방식이 조화를 이루는 본인만의 워크플로우를 설계하는 것을 권유한다. 본편에서는 필자가 임상에서 3D 프린터를 어떻게 활용하고, 적용하고 있는지를 소개하고 있다.

The inflow of digital systems into the dental field has had a great impact on dentists and dental technicians. and it brought improved accuracy, convenience, and work efficiency than before. However, digital doesn't solve everything, and it certainly has limitations. Therefore, it is recommended that clinicians clearly understand the strengths and weaknesses of the traditional method and the digital method and design their own workflow that harmonizes the two methods. In this part, I introduce how I use and apply 3D printers in clinical field.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. LEE, Wan-Sun; LEE, Du-Hyeong; LEE, Kyu-Bok. Evaluation of internal fit of interim crown fabricated with CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing system. The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 2017, 9.4: 265-270. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.265
  2. LEE, Ji-Yeon; YOON, Ji-Young; OH, Namsik. The use of surgical guide stent for implant placement. The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics, 2014, 52.4: 366-375. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2014.52.4.366
  3. STEYRER, Bernhard, et al. Hot Lithography vs. room temperature DLP 3D-printing of a dimethacrylate. Additive Manufacturing, 2018, 21: 209-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.03.013
  4. Kim T, Lee S, Kim GB, Hong D, Kwon J, Park JW, Kim N. Accuracy of a simplified 3D-printed implant surgical guide. J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Aug;124(2):195-201 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.006
  5. Tahayeri A, Morgan M, Fugolin AP, Bompolaki D, Athirasala A, Pfeifer CS, Ferracane JL, Bertassoni LE. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Dent Mater. 2018 Feb;34(2):192-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.10.003
  6. Nold J, Wesemann C, Rieg L, Binder L, Witkowski S, Spies BC, Kohal RJ. Does Printing Orientation Matter? In- Vitro Fracture Strength of Temporary Fixed Dental Prostheses after a 1-Year Simulation in the Artificial Mouth. Materials (Basel). 2021 Jan 7;14(2):259. doi: 10.3390/ma14020259.
  7. Ishida Y., Miyasaka T. Dimensional accuracy of dental casting patterns created by 3D printers. Dent. Mater. J. 2016;35:250-256. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2015-278
  8. SRINIVASAN, Murali, et al. CAD-CAM complete denture resins: an evaluation of biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and surface characteristics. Journal of Dentistry, 2021, 103785.
  9. LI, Ping, et al. Repairability of a 3D printed denture base polymer: Effects of surface treatment and artificial aging on the shear bond strength. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2021, 114: 104227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104227