Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제20권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-12
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic progressive collapse mitigation of buildings using cylindrical friction damper

  • Mirtaheri, Masoud (Department of Civil Engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology) ;
  • Omidi, Zobeydeh (Department of Civil Engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology) ;
  • Salkhordeh, Mojtaba (Department of Civil Engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology) ;
  • Mirzaeefard, Hamid (Department of Civil Engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2020.06.04
  • 심사 : 2020.12.24
  • 발행 : 2021.01.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The occurrence of progressive collapse induced by the removal of the vertical load-bearing element in the structure, because of fire or earthquake, has been a significant challenge between structural engineers. Progressive collapse is defined as the complete failure or failure of a part of the structure, initiating with a local rupture in a part of the building and can threaten the stability of the structure. In the current study, the behavior of the structures equipped with a cylindrical friction damper, when the vertical load-bearing elements are eliminated, is considered in two cases: 1-The load-bearing element is removed under the gravity load, and 2-The load-bearing element is removed due to the earthquake lateral forces. In order to obtain a generalized result in the seismic case, 22 pair motions presented in FEMA p 695 are applied to the structures. The study has been conducted using the vertical push down analysis for the case (1), and the nonlinear time-history analysis for the second case using OpenSEES software for 5,10, and 15-story steel frames. Results indicate that, in the first case, the load coefficient, and accordingly the strength of the structure equipped with cylindrical friction dampers are increased considerably. Furthermore, the results from the second case demonstrate that the displacements, and consequently the forces imposed to the structure in the buildings equipped with the cylindrical friction damper substantially was reduced. An optimum slip load is defined in the friction dampers, which permits the damper to start its frictional damping from this threshold load. Therefore, the optimum slip load of the damper is calculated and discussed for both cases.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ASCE (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, Restorn, V.A, U.S.A.
  2. BHRC (Building and Housing Research Center), (2012), Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings, Standard No. 2800, 4rd edn. BHRC: Tehran, Iran.
  3. Chan, Ricky W.K. and Faris A. (2008), "Experimental study of steel slit damper for passive energy dissipation", Eng. Struct., 30(4), 1058-1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.005.
  4. Dargush, G and Soong, T. (1997), "Passive energy dissipation and active control", In Handbook of Structural Engineering, Second Edition, 1-28. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439834350.ch27.
  5. Faridmehr, I., Mohd Hanim, O., Mahmood Bin Md, T., Ali Farokhi, N. and Reza H. (2015), "Seismic and progressive collapse assessment of sideplate moment connection system", Struct. Eng. Mech., 54(1), 35-54. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.54.1.035.
  6. FEMA P695 (2009), Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors. Fema P695, no. June: 421.
  7. Fu, F. (2012), "Response of a multi-storey steel composite building with concentric bracing under consecutive column removal scenarios", J. Construct. Steel Res. 70, 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.10.012.
  8. Fu, F. (2016), Structural Analysis and Design to Prevent Disproportionate Collapse. Structural Analysis and Design to Prevent Disproportionate Collapse. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b19662
  9. Ghods, S., Kheyroddin, A., Nazeryan, M., Mirtaheri, S.M. and Gholhaki, M. (2016), "Nonlinear behavior of connections in RCS frames with bracing and steel plate shear wall", Steel Compos. Struct., 22(4), 915-935. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.22.4.915.
  10. Griffiths, H., Pugsley, A.G. and Saunders, O. (1968), Report of the Inquiry into the Collapse of Flats at Ronan Point, Canning Town.
  11. GSA (2013), Alternate Path Analysis and Design Guidelines for Progressive Collapse Resistance, General Services Administration, Washington, U.S.A.
  12. Jalali Larijani, R., Heydar Dashti, N. and Iman, A. (2017), "Progressive collapse analysis of buildings with concentric and eccentric braced frames", Struct. Eng. Mech., 61(6), 755-763. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.61.6.755.
  13. Karami-Mohammadi, R., Mirtaheri, M., Salkhordeh, M., Mosaffa, E., Mahdavi, G. and Hariri-Ardebili, M.A. (2019), "Seismic mitigation of substation cable connected equipment using friction pendulum systems", Struct. Eng. Mech., 72(6), 785-796. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.72.6.785.
  14. Karimiyan, S., Moghadam, A.S., Husseinzadeh Kashan, A. and Karimiyan, M. (2015), "Progressive collapse evaluation of Rc symmetric and asymmetric midrise and tall buildings under earthquake loads", Int. J. Civil Eng., 13(1), 30-44. https://doi.org/10.22068/IJCE.13.1.30.
  15. Karimiyan, S., Moghadam, A.S. and Vetr, M.G. (2013), "Seismic progressive collapse assessment of 3-story RC moment resisting buildings with different levels of eccentricity in plan", Earthq. Struct., 5(3), 277-296. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.5.3.277.
  16. Kim, J., Lee, S. and Min, K.W. (2014), "Design of MR dampers to prevent progressive collapse of moment frames", Struct. Eng. Mech., 52(2), 291-306. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.52.2.291.
  17. Malhotra, A., Carson, D., Gopal, P., Braimah, A., Di Giovanni, G. and Pall, R. (20040), "Friction dampers for seismic upgrade of St. Vincent hospital, Ottawa", The 13 Th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, No. Paper No. 1952.
  18. Mashhadi, J. and Hamed, S. (2016), "Effects of damping ratio on dynamic increase factor in progressive collapse", Steel Compos. Struct., 22(3), 677-690. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.22.3.677
  19. Mirtaheri, M. and Abbasi Zoghi, M. (2016), "Design guides to resist progressive collapse for steel structures", Steel Compos. Struct., 20(2), 357-378. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.20.2.357.
  20. Mirtaheri, M., Emami, F., Zoghi, M.A. and Salkhordeh, M. (2019), "Mitigation of progressive collapse in steel structures using a new passive connection", Struct. Eng. Mech., 70(4), 381-394. https://doi.org/10.12989/SEM.2019.70.4.381.
  21. Mirtaheri, M., Amir Peyman, Z., Sahand Sharifi, S. and Hamid Rahmani, S. (2011), "Numerical and experimental study of hysteretic behavior of cylindrical friction dampers", Eng. Struct., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.07.029.
  22. Mirtaheri, M., Sehat, S. and Nazeryan, M. (2018), "Improving the behavior of buckling restrained braces through obtaining optimum steel core length", Struct. Eng. Mech., 65(4), 401-408. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.65.4.401.
  23. Song Brian, I. and Halil, S. (2013), "Experimental and analytical progressive collapse assessment of a steel frame building", Eng. Struct., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.050.
  24. Starossek, U. (2007), "Typology of progressive collapse", Eng. Struct., 29(9), 2302-2307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.11.025.
  25. Tavakoli, H.R., Naghavi, F. and Goltabar, A.R. (2015), "Effect of base isolation systems on increasing the resistance of structures subjected to progressive collapse", Earthq. Struct. 9(3), 639-656. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.3.639.
  26. Tavakoli, H.R. and Hasani, A.H. (2017), "Effect of earthquake characteristics on seismic progressive collapse potential in steel moment resisting frame", Earthq. Struct., 12(4), 529-541. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.5.529.
  27. UFC 4-023-03. (2013), Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse, Department of Defense, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
  28. Yuan, W. and Kang Hai, T. (2011), "Modeling of progressive collapse of a multi-storey structure using a spring-mass-damper system", Struct. Eng. Mech., 37(1), 79-93. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.37.1.079.