벤처창업연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship)

  • 제16권6호
  • /
  • Pages.1-16
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1975-7557(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9509(eISSN)
한국벤처창업학회 (The Korean Society of Business Venturing)
권호 표지

벤처캐피탈의 초기투자 활성화를 위한 정부의 정책개입 효과에 관한 연구

A Study on the Effectiveness of the Korean Government's Policy Intervention to Revitalize Venture Capital's Early-stage Investment

  • 투고 : 2021.11.10
  • 심사 : 2021.12.18
  • 발행 : 2021.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 지금까지 한국 정부가 벤처캐피탈 시장에 어떻게 개입해 왔는지 살펴보고, 정부의 벤처캐피탈 정책이 벤처캐피탈의 초기 투자를 촉진했는지 실증적으로 규명하는 것이다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 관련 문헌을 연구하고 국내 사례를 적용 분석하여 벤처캐피탈 시장에 대한 정부의 시장개입을 단계적으로 분류하였다. 그리고 본 연구는 정부개입의 가장 중요한 목적인 벤처캐피탈의 초기투자 활성화를 위한 우리 정부의 정책 효과를 실증적으로 분석하였다. 실증분석을 위해 한국벤처캐피탈협회와 한국펀드에서 제공한 2004년부터 2018년까지의 연도별 자료를 시계열 통계분석과 거시역학을 이용하여 분석하였다. 사례연구 결과 한국 정부는 25년 동안 직접투자를 통해 벤처캐피탈 시장에 개입했고, 이후 18년 동안 간접투자를 통해 개입해왔다. 시계열 통계분석 결과, 벤처캐피탈펀드 조성을 늘리기 위한 정부의 재정투자와 일정비율의 초기투자를 의무화하는 특수목적펀드의 비율이 높아지면서 벤처캐피털의 초기투자가 증가했다. 그러나 거시역학은 2016년부터 이 시계열 통계분석과 반대 방향의 경향을 보였다. 결론적으로, 본 연구는 시계열 통계분석 결과와 반대 방향의 경향을 정부의 벤처캐피탈 투자방법에 대한 잘못된 규제로 해석하고, 최근 정부의 간접투자 방식을 통한 직접개입의 실효성이 부족하다. 또한 본 연구에서는 사례연구와 실증연구 결과를 바탕으로 정부의 간접개입에 필요한 여섯 가지 정책제안을 제시하였다.

The purpose of this study is to examine how the Korean government has intervened in the venture capital market so far and empirically investigate whether the government's policies on venture capital have stimulated venture capital's early-stage investment. To this end, this study classified the government's market intervention in the venture capital market by stage by studying the related literature and applying and analyzing the case in Korea. And, this study empirically analyzed the effectiveness of the Korean government's policy to revitalize the early-stage investment of venture capital, which is the most important purpose of government intervention. For empirical analysis, yearly data from 2004 to 2018 provided by the Korea Venture Capital Association and Korea Fund of Funds were analyzed using time series statistical analysis and macrodynamics. As a result of the case study, the Korean government has intervened in the venture capital market through direct investment for 25 years, and has been intervening through indirect investment for the next 18 years. As a result of time-series statistical analysis, the government's fiscal investment to increase the formation of venture capital funds and the increase in the ratio of special-purpose funds that mandate a certain percentage of early-stage investment increased the early-stage investment of venture capital. However, macrodynamics showed a trend in the opposite direction from this time series statistical analysis from 2016. In conclusion, this study interprets the trend in the opposite direction to the time series statistical analysis results as the government's erroneous regulation on the venture capital investment method and the recent lack of effectiveness of direct intervention through the government's indirect investment method. In addition, based on the results of case studies and empirical studies, this study made six policy proposals necessary for indirect government intervention.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the Gachon University research fund of 2020.(GCU-202003490001)

참고문헌

  1. Armour, J., & Cumming, D.(2006). The legislative road to Silicon Valley. Oxford Economic Papers. 58(4), 596-635. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpl007
  2. Avnimelech, G., Rosiello, A., & Teubal, M.(2010). Evolutionary interpretation of venture capital policy in Israel, Germany, UK and Scotland. Science and Public Policy, 37(2), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X489608
  3. Avnimelech, G., & Teubal, M.(2004). Venture capital start-up co-evolution and the emergence & development of Israel's new high tech cluster: Part 1: Macro-background and industry analysis. Economics of innovation and new technology, 13(1), 33-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000156020
  4. Avnimelech, G., & Teubal, M.(2008). Evolutionary targeting. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18(2), 151-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-007-0080-6
  5. Bellavitis, C., Rietveld, J., & Filatotchev, I.(2020). The effects of prior co-investments on the performance of venture capitalist syndicates: A relational agency perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14(2), 240-264. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1320
  6. Bjornskov, C., & Foss, N. J.(2008). Economic freedom and entrepreneurial activity: some cross-country evidence. Public Choice, 134(3), 307-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9229-y
  7. Black, B. S., & Gilson, R. J.(1998). Venture capital and the structure of capital markets: Banks versus stock markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 47(3), 243-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(97)00045-7
  8. Bottazzi, L., Da Rin, M., & Hellmann, T.(2004). The changing face of the European venture capital industry: facts and analysis. The Journal of Private Equity, 7, 26-53. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpe.2004.391048
  9. Bottazzi, L., Da Rin, M., & Hellmann, T.(2009). The Importance of Trust for Investment: Evidence from Venture Capital (Replaced by DP 2010-49). Tilburg: Finance
  10. Brander, J. A., Egan, E. J., & Hellmann, T. F.(2010). 9. Government Sponsored versus Private Venture Capital, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  11. Brander J. A.,, Du, Q., & Hellmann, T.(2014). The effects of government-sponsored venture capital international eviddence. Review of Finance, 18, 1-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfs049
  12. Brujmann, R., Koller, M., & Olson, J.(1993). Die Industrierezession in Baden-Wurttemberg und ihre Folgen fur den Arbeitsmarkt. Eine Strukturanalyse des Referats fur Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung des Landesarbeitsamtes Baden-Wurttemberg und des Instituts fur Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung der Bundesanstalt fur Arbeit zur Diskussion um den Standort Deutschland, Stuttgart: ABF.
  13. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Singh, K.(2002). The impact of the institutional environment on the venture capital industry in Singapore. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 4(3), 197-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691060213712
  14. Collewaert, V., Manigart, S., & Aernoudt, R.(2010). Assessment of government funding of business angel networks in Flanders, Regional Studies, 44(1), 119-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400802070860
  15. Cooper, A. C.(1981). Strategic management: New ventures and small business. Long Range Planning, 14(5), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(81)90006-6
  16. Choi, Y. G.(2019). Proposal of an improvement policy for redeemable convertible preferred stock to revitalize the initial investment of venture capital. Journal of SME Policy, 71-102.
  17. Cumming, D.(2006). The determinants of venture capital portfolio size: empirical evidence. Journal of Business, 79(3), 1083-1126. https://doi.org/10.1086/500670
  18. Cumming, D.(2007). Financing Entrepreneurs Better Canadian Policy for Venture Capital, Toronto, Ontario: C.D. Howe Institute Commentary
  19. Cumming, D., & MacIntosh, J. G.(2006). Crowding out private equity: Canadian evidence. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5), 569-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.06.002
  20. Cumming, D. J., Grilli, L., & Murtinu, S.(2017). Governmental and independent venture capital investments in Europe: A firm-level performance analysis. Journal of corporate finance, 42, 439-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.10.016
  21. del-Palacio, I., Zhang, X. T., & Sole, F.(2012). The capital gap for small technology companies: public venture capital to the rescue? Small Business Economics, 38(3), 283-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9275-6
  22. Electronic Newspaper(2017). Expansion of simple common stocks will kill the venture investment market. from https://www.etnews.com/20171128000295.
  23. Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W.(1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 251-276.
  24. Gilson, R. J.(2003). Engineering a venture capital market: lessons from the American experience. Stanford Law Review, 55(4), 1067-1103.
  25. Gohmann, S. F., Hobbs, B. K., & McCrickard, M.(2008). Economic freedom and service industry growth in the United States. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5), 855-874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00259.x
  26. Gompers, P. A.(1996). Grandstanding in the venture capital industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 42(1), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(96)00874-4
  27. Gompers, P. A.(1998). Venture Capital Growing Pains: Should the Market diet. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, 1098-1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00041-7
  28. Gompers, P., & Lerner, J.(1999). The Venture Capital Cycle, 1st ed., The MIT Press, Cambridge: Mass.
  29. Grilli, L., & Murtinu, S.(2011). The differential impact of public and private venture capital investments on new technology-based firms' growth: a European analysis. In 38th Annual Conference of the European Association for Research in Industrial Economics (EARIE), 1-33.
  30. Grilli, L., & Murtinu, S.(2012). Government, Venture capital and the growth of european high-tech entrepreneurial firms. Research Policy, 43(9), 1523-1543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.002
  31. Guler, I., & Guillen, M. F.(2010). Home country networks and foreign expansion: evidence from the venture capital industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 390-410. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.49389027
  32. Hall, J. C., Nikolaev, B., Pulito, J. M., & VanMetre, B. J.(2013). The effect of personal and economic freedom on entrepreneurial activity: evidence from a new state level freedom index. American Journal of Entrepreneurship, 6(1), 88-103.
  33. Hall, J. C., & Sobel, R. S.(2008). Institutions, entrepreneurship, and regional differences in economic growth. Southern Journal of Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 69-96.
  34. Hamermesh, D. S.(1993). Labor Demand. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  35. Johansen, S.(1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of economic dynamics and control, 12(2-3), 231-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3
  36. Kim, S. Y., Kim C. R., & Kim, S. H.(2000). The Government and the Firm: The Political Economy of Industry Policy, Seoul: Dae-Young.
  37. Kreft, S. F., & Sobel, R. S.(2005). Public policy, entrepreneurship, and economic freedom. Cato Journal, 25(3), 595.
  38. KVIC(2016). Fund of funds management report(2015. Q4). Seoul: Korea Venture Investment Corporation.
  39. Lerner, J.(1995). Venture capitalists and the oversight of private firms. The Journal of Finance, 50(1), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05175.x
  40. Lerner, J.(2002). When bureaucrats meet entrepreneurs: the design of effective 'public venture capital' programmes. The Economic Journal, 112(2), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00684
  41. Lerner, J. (2009). Boulevard of broken dreams. Princeton University Press.
  42. Lerner, J.(2010). The future of public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital. Small Business Economics, 35(3), 255-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9298-z
  43. Lerner, J., & Schoar, A.(2005). Does legal enforcement affect financial transactions? The contractual channel in private equity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(1), 223-246. https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553053327443
  44. Lerner, J., & Tag, J.(2013). Institutions and venture capital. Ind Corp Change, 22(1), 153-182. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dts050
  45. McMullen, J. S., Bagby, D., & Palich, L. E.(2008). Economic freedom and the motivation to engage in entrepreneurial action. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 875-895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00260.x
  46. Metrick, A., & Yasuda, A.(2010). Venture capital & finance of innovation: 2-nd edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  47. Misra, K., Memili, E., Welsh, D. H. B., & Sarkar, S.(2014). The determinants of venture creation time: a cross-country perspective. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(2), 253-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-012-0226-3
  48. Murray, G. C.(2007). Venture capital and government policy. Handbook of Research on Venture Capital, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 113-151.
  49. Murray, G., Cowling, M., Liu, W., & Kalinowska-Beszczynska, O.(2012). Government co-financed 'Hybrid' Venture Capital programmes: generalizing developed economy experience and its relevance to emerging nations. Kauffman International Research and Policy Roundtable, Liverpool, 1-29.
  50. Murtinu, S.(2020). The government whispering to entrepreneurs: Public venture capital, policy shifts, and firm productivity. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 15(2), 279-308. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1374
  51. North, D. C.(1990). Economic performance(Vol. 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  52. Nystrom, K.(2008). The institutions of economic freedom and entrepreneurship: evidence from panel data. Public Choice, 136(3-4), 269-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9295-9
  53. Park, J. Y., & Shin, H. H.(2020). The Effect of Venture Capital Investment on Corporate Innovation Performance. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.15.1.202002.1
  54. Robbins-Roth, C.(2001). From Alchemy to IPO: The Business of Biotechnology, Cambridge, UK: Perseus Books.
  55. Rosen, R. J.(1991). Research and development with asymmetric firm sizes. Rand Journal of Economics, 22(3), 411-429. https://doi.org/10.2307/2601056
  56. Rosiello, A., Avnimelech, G., & Teubal, M.(2011). Towards a systemic and evolutionary framework for venture capital policy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 21(1), 167-189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-010-0189-x
  57. Ruhnka, J. C., & Young, J. E.(1991). Some Hypotheses about Risk in Venture Capital Investing. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(2), 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(91)90014-5
  58. Scott, W. R.(1995). Institutions and organizations(Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  59. Snieska, V., & Venckuviene, V.(2012). The rationality for government sponsored venture capital funds in Lithuania: innovation perspective. Economics and Management, 17(1), 230-236.
  60. Wenqi, S., Yuanjun, Z., & Lu, S.(2020). Big Data Analytics for Venture Capital Application:Towards Innovation Performance Improvement. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 557-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.017