References
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural. Science Education, 82, 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199807)82:4<417::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-E
- Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2014). The Australian Curriculum. Sydney, Australia: Author.
- Ballantyne, R., Hughies, K., & Mylonas, A. (2002). Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 427-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000009302
- Bell, R., Blair, L., Crawford, B., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? The impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students' understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 487-509. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10086
- Cheon, M., & Lee, B. (2018). Analysis of characteristics of scientific inquiry problem finding process in small group free inquiry. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(6), 865-874. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2018.38.6.865
- Cole, S., Coats, M., & Lentell, H. (1986). Towards good teaching by correspondence. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 1(1), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051860010105
- Hodson, D. (1982). Is there a scientific method? Education in Chemistry, 19(4), 112-126.
- Kim, G., & Ha, M. (2019). Exploring the difficulties of high school students in self-directed scientific inquiry. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(6). 707-715.
- Kim, H., & Lee, B. (2018). Analysis of the types of physics inquiries in science textbooks based on the 2015 revised national science curriculum. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 68(10), 1059-1068. https://doi.org/10.3938/npsm.68.1059
- Kim, H., & Song, J. (2004). The exploration of open scientific inquiry model emphasizing students' argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(6), 1216-1234.
- Kim, H., Yoon, H., Lee, K., & Cho, H. (2010). Secondary science teachers' perception of 'Free inquiry' of the 2007 revised science curriculum. Secondary Educational Research, 58(3), 213-235. https://doi.org/10.25152/ser.2010.58.3.213
- Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2010). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 344-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005
- Lee, B. (2013). Pre-service science teachers' difficulties in the 'Inquiry mentoring' program. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(7), 1300-1311. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2013.33.7.1300
- Lee, B. (2021). Analysis of the pre-service science teachers' strategies in an inquiry theme finding activity through a change of prior inquiry. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 71(5), 490-499. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.71.490
- Lee, B., & Lee, S. (2004). Analysis of interaction pattern of the students in online discussion of physics investigation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(3),638-645.
- Lee, S., & Lee, B. (2018). High-school physics teachers' difficulties in teaching textbook physics inquiries. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(4), 519-526. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2018.38.4.519
- Lee, S., & Lee, B. (2019). Development of a science teacher in-service training program for improving physics inquiry teaching ability. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 69(4), 401-409. https://doi.org/10.3938/npsm.69.401
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Ministry of Education (1997). National Science Curriculum (No. 1997-15). Seoul, Korea: Author.
- Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development (2017). National Science Curriculum (No. 2007-79). Seoul: Author.
- Nancy M. T. (2009). Designing peer review for pedagogical success. Journal of College Science Teaching, 38(4) 14-19.
- National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Park, J. (2005). Analysis of the characteristics and processes of the generation of scientific inquiry problems. Sae Mulli, 50(4), 203-211.
- Ryu, S., & Park, J. (2008). Analysis of the scientific inquiry problem generated by the scientifically-gifted in ill and well inquiry situation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(8), 860-869.
- Shim, K., Park, J., Lee, K., Son, J., Moon, H., Park, J., Bae, M., So, Y., Ahn, S., Lee, S., Jeon, B., & Jho, H. (2018). Science inquiry experiment. Seoul: Visang.
- Son, J., Lee, B., Jho, H., Choi, J., & Sim, K. (2018). Analysis of organization of physics curriculum in science core schools. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 68(12), 1347-1355. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.68.1347
- Topping, K., Smith, F. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611428
- Department for Education (2015). National curriculum in England: science programmes of study. London, England: Author.
- Wellington, J. J. (1998). Practical work in science: time for a reappraisal. In J. J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science (pp. 3-15). New York: Routledge.
- Zion, M., Slezak, M., Shapira, D., Link, E., Bashan, N., Brumer, M., Orian, T., Nussinowitz, R., Court, D., Agrest, B., Mendelovici, R., & Valanides, N. (2004). Dynamic, open inquiry in biology learning. Science Education, 88(5), 728-753. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10145