Animal Bioscience

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of environmental enrichment for piglets in the nursery phase

  • Received : 2020.04.14
  • Accepted : 2020.05.26
  • Published : 2021.01.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The effect of environmental enrichment on the behaviour of piglets in the nursery phase was evaluated. Methods: A total of 450 hybrid pigs (21 day old), including both females and uncastrated males, weighing approximately 6 kg, were distributed in a completely randomised design with 3 treatments and 3 replicates of 50 animals each. The treatments were: i) pen without environmental enrichment (control), ii) treatment consisting of continuous environmental enrichment (CEE) with rubber balls throughout the experimental period, and iii) treatment consisting of environmental enrichment with washed balls (EEWB) during the whole experimental period which were removed daily for washing. For the behavioural evaluation, 10 animals were randomly selected per replicate. The behavioural assessments were performed once a week, from 8 am to 6 pm, using images captured with a video camera. The data were submitted to non-parametric analyses, the means were compared using the Bonferroni test, and Person's correlations were also calculated. Results: A statistical difference (p = 0.001) was observed in the B5 (playful) behaviour; the animals in the EEWB treatment group had a higher frequency of this behaviour than animals in the control treatment group. The animals in the control group showed a higher frequency of B7 behaviour (lying down) (p = 0.026) than those in the EEWB and CEE treatment groups. The animals in the control group had a higher frequency of the B9 (belly nosing) behaviour than those in the EEWB group (p = 0.015). There was a tendency towards a higher frequency of behaviour B3 (walking in the pen) (p = 0.067) when the animals received the control treatment than treatments EEWB or CEE. Conclusion: The use of an enriching object improved the animal welfare and altered the correlation between the evaluated behaviours compared to the animals that did not have environmental enrichment.

Keywords

References

  1. Machado SP, Caldara FR, Foppa L, et al. Behavior of pigs reared in enriched environment: alternatives to extend pigs attention. PLos One 2017;12:e0168427. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168427
  2. Weary DM, Jasper J, Hotzel MJ. Understanding weaning distress. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2008;110:24-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.03.025
  3. Nowicki J, Swierkosz S, Tuz R, Schwarz T. The influence of aromatized environmental enrichment objects with changeable aromas on the behaviour of weaned piglets. Vet Arh 2015;85:425-35.
  4. Presto MH, Andersson HK, Folestam S, Lindberg JE. Activity behaviour and social interactions of pigs raised outdoors and indoors. Arch Anim Breed 2008;51:338-50. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-51-338-2008
  5. Camerlink I, Bijma P, Kemp B, Bolhuis E. Relationship between growth rate and oral manipulation, social nosing, and aggression in finishing pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2012;142:11-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.09.004
  6. Guy JH, Meads ZA, Shiel RS, Edwards SA. The effect of combining different environmental enrichment materials on enrichment use by growing pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2013;144:102-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.01.006
  7. O'Driscoll K, O'Gorman DM, Taylor S, Boyle LA. The influence of a magnesium-rich marine extract on behaviour, salivary cortisol levels and skin lesions in growing pigs. Animal 2013;7:1017-27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112002431
  8. Van de Weerd HA, Day JEL. A review of environmental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2009;116:1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.08.001
  9. Donaldson TM, Newberry RC, Spinka M, Cloutier S. Effects of early play experience on play behaviour of piglets after weaning. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2002;79:221-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00138-7
  10. Held SDE, Spinka M. Animal play and animal welfare. Anim Behav 2011;81:891-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.01.007
  11. Kornum BR, Knudsen GM. Cognitive testing of pigs (Sus scrofa) in translational biobehavioral research. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2011;35:437-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.05.004
  12. Gifford AK, Cloutier S, Newberry RC. Objects as enrichment: effects of object exposure time and delay interval on object recognition memory of the domestic pig. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2007;107:206-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.10.019
  13. Campos JA, Tinoco IFF, Silva FF, Pupa JMR, Silva IJO. Environmental enrichment for piglets during nursery coming from weaning at 21 and 28 days. Rev Bras Cienc Agrar 2010;5:272-8. https://doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v5i2a660
  14. Bracke MBM. Multifactorial testing of enrichment criteria: pigs 'demand' hygiene and destructibility more than sound. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2007;107:218-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.10.001
  15. Pinheiro JV. Research on animal welfare as a foundation and environmental enrichment through the use of object suspended in the behavior of piglets and its effect as a novelty [dissertation]. Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil: University of Sao Paulo; 2009.
  16. Vanheukelom V, Driessen B, Maenhout D, Geers R. Peat as environmental enrichment for piglets: the effect on behaviour, skin lesions and production results. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2011;134:42-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.06.010
  17. Broom DM, Fraser AF. Behaviour and welfare of domestic animals. 4th ed. Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil: Editora Manole Ltda; 2010.
  18. Bench CJ, Gonyou HW. Effect of environmental enrichment at two stages of development on belly nosing in piglets weaned at fourteen days. J Anim Sci 2006;84:3397-403. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-050
  19. Beattie VE, O'Connell NE, Moss BW. Influence of environmental enrichment on the behaviour, performance and meat quality of domestic pigs. Livest Prod Sci 2000;65:71-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00179-7