산업경영시스템학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering)

  • 제44권4호
  • /
  • Pages.76-84
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2005-0461(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7975(eISSN)
한국산업경영시스템학회 (Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

군용항공기 연구개발 사업의 리스크 관리

Risk Management for R&D Projects in the Military Aircraft Systems

  • Kim, Sung Hun (Intranational Cooperation Bureau, Defense Acquisition Program Administration) ;
  • Lee, Hyun Cheol (School of Business, Korea Aerospace University)
  • 투고 : 2021.11.09
  • 심사 : 2021.12.14
  • 발행 : 2021.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Military aircraft R&D projects require large-scale investment in cost and time, and involve a complex coordination process in decision-making. The R&D project manager should determine the development management priorities as accurately as possible and focus on R&D capabilities, thereby reducing the risks of the aircraft R&D project. To this end, this study aims to reduce R&D risk by prioritizing cost, schedule, and performance, which are basic management factors used in R&D project management in defense project management regulations. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is applied using a questionnaire for managers in charge of aviation R&D under the Defense Acquisition Program Administration. As a primary result, the importance of the factors that the aircraft R&D project manager should consider was derived in the order of performance, cost, and schedule, and the priorities of performance and cost in the lower layer were also identified. In addition, in order to provide practical risk management measures to aircraft R&D project managers, the results of analyzing 28 cases of US National Transportation Safety Board accidents were compared and analyzed with the AHP analysis results, and management measures suitable for the situation were specified.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, O., A Study on the Distinct Feature of Aircraft Industry and the Industrial Environment - Initial Study, Current Industrial and Technological Trends in Aerospace, 2012, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 49-66.
  2. Akram, M. and Pilbeam, C., Critical success factors for effective risk management in new product development, Proceedings of 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management, IEEE IESM 2015, pp. 1205-1212.
  3. Alligier, R. and Gianazza, D., Learning Aircraft Operational Factors to Improve Aircraft Climb Prediction: A Large Scale Multi-Airport Study. Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies, 2018, Vol. 96, pp. 72-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.08.012
  4. Archer, T., Ventresca, C., Dehoff, B., Rapson, B., Enghauser, B., Kesling, B., and Rx, A., A Fresh Look at Risk in S & T A Systems Engineering Approach, The Air Force Research Laboratory, 14th NDIA Systems Engineering Conference, San Diego, 2011, 88.
  5. Aviation Safety Policy Division of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Flight Theory, 2016.12.
  6. Bond, C. A., Mayer, L. A., Mcmahon, M. E., Kallimani, J. G., and Sanchez, R., Developing a Methodology for Risk- Informed Trade-Space Analysis in Acquisition, RAND Corporation, 2015.
  7. Burrage, K., Risk management in safety critical areas, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 1995, Vol. 61, No. 2-3, pp. 229-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-0161(94)00109-V
  8. Choi, M.J., Na, H.Y., and Lee, S.H., A Study on Performance Risk Measurement for the Defense R&D Program, Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 2009, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 309-316.
  9. Daidzic, N. E., Optimization of Takeoffs on Unbalanced Fields using Takeoff Performance Tool, International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 2016, Vol. 3, No. 3.
  10. Defense Acquisition Program Administration, SE-based risk management guidebook, 2018.
  11. Defense Acquisition Program Administration, System Engineering Guidebook, 2007.
  12. Department Of Defense, Operational Safety, Suitability, & Effectiveness for the Aeronautical Enterprise, MILHDBK-514(USAF), 2003.
  13. Egbert Torenbeek, Cruise performance and range prediction reconsidered, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1997, Vol. 33, No. 5-6, pp. 285-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-0421(96)00007-3
  14. FAA, Advisory Circular (AC90-89B), In Advisory Circular (AC90-89B), 2015.
  15. FAA, Aviation Maintenance Technician Handbook - Airframe Volume 1. Aviation Maintenance Technician Handbook - Airframe, 2018, 1-588.
  16. Han Changhwan, A Study on the Process of NASA Technical Risk Management for System Development, Current Industrial and Technological Trends in Aerospace, 2015, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 92-106.
  17. Hong, J.M., A Study on the Evaluation Items of New and Renewable Energy of Private Companies Applying AHP Techniques, Korean Energy Economic Review, 2011, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 115-142.
  18. Hong Seungtaek., A Study on Airworthiness Certification System for Aircraft Development [dissertation], [Seoul, Korea]: Korea Aerospace University, 2012.
  19. Hwang SungHwan, Ahn TeaHo, An Empirical Study on Risk factors in Defense R&D Projects, Journal of the Korea Management Engineers Society, 2014, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 71-85.
  20. ICAO, A Coordinated, Risk-based Approach to Improving Global Aviation Safety, 2014.
  21. ICAO, Doc.10004 Global Aviation Safety Plan 2020-2022 EN. In Icao. 2019.
  22. Jang Youngbae, A Study on the Effect of External Risk Factors of Military Aircraft R&D Projects on the Performance of Project Management [dissertation], [Seoul, Korea]: Soongsil University, 2018.
  23. Ju seong man., Introduction of aviation weapon system software and direction of development, Journal of The Defense science & Technology Information, 2014, Vol. 45, No. 3/4, pp. 6-18.
  24. Kasap, D. and Kaymak, M., Risk identification step of the project risk management, Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, 2007, pp. 2116-2120.
  25. Kendall, F., Department of Defense Risk, Issue, and Opportunity Management Guide for Defense Acquisition Programs/F. Kendall-Washington, DC, 2017 January, 20301-23030.
  26. Korea the Department of Labor, A feasibility study on the comprehensive evaluation of the electronic card pilot project and the expansion of the business, Korea Labor Institute 2006.
  27. Korea's Ministry of National Defense., Order for Defense Development, 2539(20210406).
  28. Na, S.H., Sung, Y.Y., Chae Seonghee, Kim Misook, Jung Hyunsuk, Kim Kwanyeon, Kim Maengseon, Han Sanggil, Cheondubong., Air Accident Case Study 2007,A research report by the Korea Aviation Promotion Association, 2007.12, pp. 1-362.
  29. Naor, M., Adler, N., Pinto, G.D., and Dumanis, A., Psychological safety in aviation new product development teams: Case study of 737 max airplane, Sustainability (Switzerland), 2020, Vol. 12, No. 21, pp. 1-15.
  30. Olson, Wayne M., Air Force Flight Test Center Edwards AFB CA, Aircraft Performance Flight Testing, Final rept., 2000.9.1.
  31. Park, K.A., Optimization of aircraft industry structure and industrial development, The Journal of Aerospace Industry, 1999.12, Vol. 52, pp. 29-41.
  32. Park. S.H., Oh, J.T., and Lee, S.Y., An AHP-based Assessment Criteria Decision System for National Research and Development Tasks, Journal of Digital Convergence, 2020, Vol. 18. No. 5, pp. 405-410. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2020.18.5.405
  33. Sage, A. P., Risk Management for Systems Engineering Risk Management, Journal of Systems and Software, 2004, Vol. 30, No. 1-2, pp. 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0164-1212(94)00114-3