DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Hormone induced recipients for embryo transfer in mice

  • Lee, Yeonmi (Department of Biomedical Science, College of Life Science, CHA University) ;
  • Kang, Eunju (Department of Biomedical Science, College of Life Science, CHA University)
  • 투고 : 2021.11.03
  • 심사 : 2021.12.09
  • 발행 : 2021.12.31

초록

Embryo transfer (ET) in the animal is an important procedure to generate genetically engineered animals and conserve genetic resources. For ET experiments in mice, pseudopregnant recipients are usually prepared with proestrus stage of females and vasectomized males. However, this conventional method is inefficient because the size of female colonies should be large to select only the proestrus stage in the estrous cycle and the surgical procedures are required to generate vasectomized males. In this study, we established a simple and efficient protocol to prepare ET recipients using the estrous synchronization with hormone injection and the mating with wild male mice. The delivery rate of ET recipients tended to be increased with estrous synchronization using hormone injection (100%) compared to the conventional method (71%). Further, natural pregnancy of the recipients, induced by mating with a wild male, significantly enhanced the birth rate of ET offspring than the conventional method (33% vs. 13%). Based on the results, we concluded that our new protocol using hormone injection to ET recipients and mating with wild males could be more efficient and simpler compared to the conventional method.

키워드

과제정보

This work has been supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (grant nos. NRF-2018R1A2B3001244 and NRF-2021R1I1A1A01049705) and an intramural grant from the CHA University (202100320001).

참고문헌

  1. Barsuren E, Kim SH, Yoon JT. 2019. Effect of embryo transfer seven days after artificial insemination with sexed and conventional semen from superovulated cattle. J. Anim. Reprod. Biotechnol. 34:106-110. https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.34.2.106
  2. Bradford GE. 1979. Genetic variation in prenatal survival and litter size. J. Anim. Sci. 49 Suppl 2:66-74. https://doi.org/10.1093/ansci/49.Supplement_II.66
  3. Byers SL, Wiles MV, Taft RA. 2012. Mouse estrous cycle identification tool and images. PLoS One 7:e35538. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035538
  4. Choi BH, Park BY, Kong R, Son MJ, Park CS, Shin NH, Cheon HY, Yang YR, Lee JW, Kong IK. 2019. Effect of serum and serum free media on the developmental competence of OPU derived bovine IVP embryo. J. Anim. Reprod. Biotechnol. 34:305-310. https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.34.4.305
  5. Ertzeid G and Storeng R. 2001. The impact of ovarian stimulation on implantation and fetal development in mice. Hum. Reprod. 16:221-225. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.2.221
  6. Ezoe K, Daikoku T, Yabuuchi A, Murata N, Kawano H, Abe T, Okuno T, Kato K. 2014. Ovarian stimulation using human chorionic gonadotrophin impairs blastocyst implantation and decidualization by altering ovarian hormone levels and downstream signaling in mice. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 20:1101-1116. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gau065
  7. Flachs P, Mihola O, Simecek P, Gregorova S, Schimenti JC, Matsui Y, Baudat F, de Massy B, Pialek J, Trachtulec Z. 2012. Interallelic and intergenic incompatibilities of the Prdm9 (Hst1) gene in mouse hybrid sterility. PLoS Genet. 8:e1003044. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003044
  8. Gregorova S and Forejt J. 2000. PWD/Ph and PWK/Ph inbred mouse strains of Mus m. musculus subspecies--a valuable resource of phenotypic variations and genomic polymorphisms. Folia Biol. (Praha) 46:31-41.
  9. Ha AN, Fakruzzaman M, Lee KL, Wang E, Lee JI, Kong IK. 2013. Development of new vitrification method for preimplantation mouse embryo. J. Emb. Trans. 28:141-147. https://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2013.28.2.141
  10. Hasegawa A, Mochida K, Ogonuki N, Hirose M, Tomishima T, Ogura A. 2017. Efficient and scheduled production of pseudopregnant female mice for embryo transfer by estrous cycle synchronization. J. Reprod. Dev. 63:539-545. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2017-068
  11. Jung NH, Kim SH, Yoon JT. 2020. Study on the in-vitro culture method for normal embryonic cell development of porcine parthenogenetic embryos. J. Anim. Reprod. Biotechnol. 35:94-101. https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.35.1.94
  12. Kim SG and Park HD. 2019. Effect of addition of ESCM and ESM during in vitro maturation on in vitro development of porcine follicular oocytes. J. Anim. Reprod. Biotechnol. 34:205-211. https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.34.3.205
  13. Lamas S, Franquinho F, Morgado M, Mesquita JR, Amorim I. 2020. C57BL/6J and B6129F1 embryo transfer: unilateral and bilateral transfer, embryo number and recipient female background control for the optimization of embryo survival and litter size. Animals (Basel) 10:1424. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081424
  14. Lee M, Ahn JI, Kwun H, Ko DW, Lim JM. 2018. Possible improvement of oocyte supply by the use of aged mice and different gonadotrophins. J. Emb. Trans. 33:69-73. https://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2018.33.2.69
  15. Lee SJ, Koo OJ. 2015. Optimization of in vitro murine embryo culture condition based on commercial M16 media. J. Emb. Trans. 30:315-317. https://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2015.30.4.315
  16. Mahabir E, Volland R, Landsberger A, Manz S, Na E, Michel G. 2018. Reproductive performance after unilateral or bilateral oviduct transfer of 2-cell embryos in mice. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 57:110-114.
  17. Mochida K. 2020. Development of assisted reproductive technologies in small animal species for their efficient preservation and production. J. Reprod. Dev. 66:299-306. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2020-033
  18. Preece C, Alghadban S, Bouchareb A, Moralli D, Davies B. 2021. Replacement of surgical vasectomy through the use of wild-type sterile hybrids. Lab Anim. (NY.) 50:49-52. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41684-020-00692-w
  19. So S, Karagozlu MZ, Kang E. 2020. Fasudil increases the establishment of somatic cell nuclear transfer embryonic stem cells in mouse. J. Anim. Reprod. Biotechnol. 35:21-27. https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.35.1.21