DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Perceived Social Support of Family Caregivers for People with Dementia: Concept Analysis

치매 환자의 가족 돌봄 제공자가 인식하는 사회적지지: 개념 분석

  • Kim, Aeri (Center for Human-Caring Nurse Leaders for the Future by Brain Korea 21(BK 21) Four Project, College of Nursing, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Jeongyeon (Center for Human-Caring Nurse Leaders for the Future by Brain Korea 21(BK 21) Four Project, College of Nursing, Seoul National University) ;
  • Woo, Kyungmi (College of Nursing.Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University)
  • 김애리 (서울대학교 간호대학.BK21 4단계 사업(미래간호인재양성사업단)) ;
  • 김정연 (서울대학교 간호대학.BK21 4단계 사업(미래간호인재양성사업단)) ;
  • 우경미 (서울대학교 간호대학.간호과학연구소)
  • Received : 2021.07.28
  • Accepted : 2021.11.16
  • Published : 2021.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: Most of the currently used concepts and measurements of social support have been relevant for general population. The main purpose of this study is to conduct the concept analysis of perceived social support(PSS) of family caregivers for people with dementia. Methods: This study adopted the Walker and Avant concept analysis methodology. Results: Findings from this concept analysis suggested four defining attributes of PSS of family caregivers for people with dementia: 1) PSS is help or assistance that family caregivers perceive as available when needed; 2) PSS is offered through socio-ecological structure; 3) PSS has a specific function to meet the needs of family caregivers; and 4) PSS includes quality aspects where family caregivers choose, use, or evaluate it. Borrowing from the socio-ecological model, this study proposed the structural aspects of PSS. This study also identified functional aspects of PSS, such as emotional support, informational support, appraisal support, and practical support. Finally, this study assessed quality aspects of PSS, such as satisfaction, timeliness, usefulness, accessibility, and coordination. Conclusion: Focusing on family caregivers for people with dementia, we proposed a new model of PSS. The present study helped refine and clarify the concept of PSS of family caregivers for people with dementia. The results of this study may also contribute to promoting the development of more effective instruments for the concept.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 2020년도 서울대학교 간호과학연구소대학원생 학술모임지원사업과 교육부 및 한국연구재단의 BK21 4단계 사업(미래간호인재양성사업단)의 지원을 받았음.

References

  1. Brodaty H. Families of People with Dementia. In: Families and Mental Disorders. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2005. p. 25-53. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/0470024712
  2. National Institute of Dementia. Korean Dementia Observatory 2019. Research Report. Seoul, Korea: National Institute of Dementia; 2020 February. Report No.:NIDR-1902-0028.
  3. Chung K. 2017 National Survey of Older Koreans: Finding and Implications. Research Report. Sejong City, Korea: Korea institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2018 January. Report No.: 2018-01.
  4. AARP and National Alliance for Caregiving. Caregiving in the United States 2020. Paraplegia News. 2020;74(8):44. https://doi.org/10.26419/ppi.00103.001
  5. Schulz R, Beach SR, Czaja SJ, Martire LM, Monin JK. Family caregiving for older adults. Annual Reviews of Psychology. 2020;71(1):635-659. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050754
  6. Sheehan OC, Haley WE, Howard VJ, Huang J, Rhodes JD, Roth DL. Stress, burden, and well-being in dementia and non-dementia caregivers: Insights from the caregiving transitions study. The Gerontologist. 2020;61(5):670-679. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa108
  7. Chiao C-Y, Wu H-S, Hsiao C-Y. Caregiver burden for informal caregivers of patients with dementia: A systematic review. International Nursing Review. 2015;62(3):340-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12194
  8. Fonareva I, Oken BS. Physiological and functional consequences of caregiving for relatives with dementia. International Psychogeriatrics. 2014;26(5):725-747. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610214000039
  9. Penning MJ, Wu Z. Caregiver stress and mental health: Impact of caregiving relationship and gender. The Gerontologist. 2016; 56(6):1102-1113. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv038
  10. Stall NM, Kim SJ, Hardacre KA, Shah PS, Straus SE, Bronskill SE, et al. Association of informal caregiver distress with health outcomes of community-dwelling dementia care recipients: A systematic review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2019;67(3):609-617. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15690
  11. Sorensen S, Duberstein P, Gill D, Pinquart M. Dementia care: Mental health effects, intervention strategies, and clinical implications. Lancet Neurology. 2006;5(11):961-973. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70599-3
  12. House JS, Umberson D, Landis KR. Structures and processes of social support. Annual Review of Sociology. 1988;14(1):293-318. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.14.1.293
  13. Sarason IG, Levine HM, Basham RB, Sarason BR. Assessing social support: The social support questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1983;44(1):127-139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.127
  14. Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin. 1985;98(2):310-357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
  15. World Health Organization. Dementia: a public health priority. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2012. 102 p. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/75263
  16. Fortinsky R. Health care triads and dementia care: Integrative framework and future directions. Aging & Mental Health. 2001; 5(sup1):35-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/713649999
  17. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Care Needed: Improving the Lives of People with Dementia. In OECD Health Policy studies, OECD Health Policy Studies. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2018. 157 p. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264985197-en
  18. Cohen S, Underwood LG, Gottlieb BH. Social support measurement and interventions. Cary: Oxford University Press, Incorporated; 2000. 345 p. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780195126709.003.0010
  19. McDowell I. Measuring Health:A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 4th ed. New York:Oxford University Press; 2006. 765 p.
  20. Broese van Groenou MI, De Boer AH. Providing informal care in a changing society. European Journal of Ageing. 2016;13(3):271-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-016-0370-7
  21. Walker LO, Avant KC. Strategies for theory construction in nursing. 5th ed. Boston: Prentice Hall; 2011. 243 p.
  22. Woo K. What does "Managed long term care service" mean in the United States? A concept analysis from a case manager's perspective. Home Health Care Management & Practice. 2021;33(3):210-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1084822320969619
  23. Prunty MM, Foli KJ. Guilt experienced by caregivers to individuals with dementia: A concept analysis. International Journal of Older People Nursing. 2019;14(2):e12227. https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12227
  24. Park JW. A Study to development a scale of social support [dissertation]. [Seoul]: Yonsei University; 1985. 127 p.
  25. Oh K, Oh KO, Lee SJ, Kim JA, Jeong CJ, Kim HR, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Korean social support questionnaire. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2008;38(6):881-890. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2008.38.6.881
  26. World Health Organization. Ottawa Charter for health promotion. Health Promotion International. 1986;1(4):405. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/1.4.405
  27. Bronfenbrenner U. Lewinian space and ecological substance. Journal of Social Issues. 1977;33(4):199-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1977.tb02533.x
  28. So JK. Toward developing social capital indicators. Journal of The Korean Regional Development Association. 2004;16(1):89-118.
  29. McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education & Behavior. 1988;15(4):351-377. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818801500401