DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of toothbrush abrasion and surface treatments on the color and translucency of resin infiltrated hybrid ceramics

  • Labban, Nawaf (Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University) ;
  • Al Amri, Mohammad (Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University) ;
  • Alhijji, Saleh (Indiana University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Alnafaiy, Sarah (Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University) ;
  • Alfouzan, Afnan (Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University) ;
  • Iskandar, Mounir (Private Practice at Radiance Dentistry) ;
  • Feitosa, Sabrina (Department of Biomedical Sciences and Comprehensive care, Division of Biomedical and Applied Sciences, Indiana University School of Dentistry)
  • 투고 : 2020.06.30
  • 심사 : 2020.08.24
  • 발행 : 2021.02.26

초록

PURPOSE. The study compared the color change, lightness, and translucency of hybrid resin ceramics exposed to toothbrush abrasion and surface treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Four hybrid ceramics [Lava Ultimate (LU), Vita Enamic (EN), Shofu HC (SH), and Crystal Ultra (CU)] were compared with a glass-ceramic (Vita Mark II) control. One hundred and twenty specimen blocks were prepared using a precision saw machine. Specimens in each material were divided into four subgroups based on the surface treatment (polishing or staining) and a storage medium (water or citric acid). Simulated tooth brushing with a mixture of 100 RDA (radioactive abrasives) with 0.3 ml distilled water was used for 3650 cycles (7300 strokes) for each specimen. Measurements for the color change, lightness, and translucency were measured after toothbrushing using a spectrophotometer. Statistical analysis compared outcomes using paired t-test, ANOVA, and Tukey post hoc test. RESULTS. The maximum color change was identified in SH (stained acid) [1.44 (0.40)], whereas the lowest was identified in EN (polished water) [0.66 (0.16)] material. The maximum and minimum loss of surface translucency was observed in SH (polished water) [12.3 (0.52)] and EN (stained acid) [6.5 (0.55)] specimens, respectively. Lastly, loss of lightness was the highest in VM (polished acid) [69 (0.95)], whereas the lowest was observed in CU (stained water) [56.7 (0.86)]. CONCLUSION. The comparison presented a significant effect of toothbrush abrasion on translucency and lightness of the hybrid resin ceramics. Color change was not significantly influenced irrespective of the storage medium employed. Surface staining demonstrated the preservation and stability of color and optical properties under the influence of toothbrush abrasion and chemical trauma.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Almeida JR, Schmitt GU, Kaizer MR, Boscato N, Moraes RR. Resin-based luting agents and color stability of bonded ceramic veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114: 272-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.01.008
  2. Silami FD, Tonani R, Alandia-Roman CC, Pires-de-Souza FD. Influence of different types of resin luting agents on color stability of ceramic laminate veneers subjected to accelerated artificial aging. Brazilian Dent J 2016;27:95-100. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201600348
  3. Vohra F, Labban N, Al-Hussaini A, Al-Jarboua M, Zawawi R, Alrahlah A, Naseem M. Influence of Er;Cr:YS-GG laser on shear bond strength and color stability of lithium disilicate ceramics: an in vitro study. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg 2019;37:483-8. https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2018.4582
  4. Buyukkaplan SU, Ozarslan MM, Barutcigil C, Arslan M, Barutcigil K, Yoldan EE. Effects of staining liquids and finishing methods on translucency of a hybrid ceram ic material having two different translucency levels. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:387-93. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.5.387
  5. Vichi A, Carrabba M, Paravina R, Ferrari M. Translucency of ceramic materials for CEREC CAD/CAM system. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26:224-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12105
  6. Sari kaya I, Yerliyurt K, Hayran Y. Effect of surface finishing on the colour stability and translucency of dental ceramics. BMC Oral Health 2018;18:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0508-4
  7. Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Eichberger M, Guth JF. Evaluation of mechanical and optical behavior of current esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM composites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2015;55:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.10.004
  8. Dirxen C, Blunck U, Preissner S. Clinical performance of a new biomimetic double network material. Open Dent J 2013;7:118-22. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210620130904003
  9. Pop-Ciutrila IS, Dudea D, Eugenia Badea M, Moldovan M, Cîmpean SI, Ghinea R. Shade correspondence, color, and translucency differences between human dentine and a CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic system. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016;28:S46-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12195
  10. Lepri CP, Palma-Dibb RG. Surface roughness and color change of a composite: influence of beverages and brushing. Dent Mater J 2012;31:689-96. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2012-063
  11. Kilinc E, Antonson S, Hardigan P, Kesercioglu A. The effect of ceramic restoration shade and thickness on the polymerization of light-and dual-cure resin cements. Oper Dent 2011;36:661-9. https://doi.org/10.2341/10-206-L
  12. Johnston WM. Review of translucency determinations and applications to dental materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26:217-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12112
  13. Krithikadatta J, Gopikrishna V, Datta M. CRIS Guidelines (Checklist for Reporting In-vitro Studies): A concept note on the need for standardized guidelines for improving quality and transparency in reporting in-vitro studies in experimental dental research. J Conserv Dent 2014;17:301-4. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.136338
  14. Sharma GWu, Dalal EN. The CIEDE2000 color-difference formula: Implementation notes, supplementary test data, and mathematical observations. Color Res Appl 2005;30:21-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.20070
  15. Johnston WM, Ma T, Kienle BH. Translucency parameter of colorants for maxillofacial prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:79-86.
  16. Shahmiri R, Standard OC, Hart JN, Sorrell CC. Optical properties of zirconia ceramics for esthetic dental restorations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:36-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.009
  17. Acar O, Yilmaz B, Altintas SH, Chandrasekaran I, Johnston WM. Color stainability of CAD/CAM and nanocomposite resin materials. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:71-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.014
  18. Zimmerli B, Koch T, Flury S, Lussi A. The influence of toothbrushing and coffee staining on different composite surface coatings. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:469-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0522-2
  19. Albaker AM, Al Deeb L, Alhenaki AM, Aldeeb M, Al Ahdal K, Abduljabbar T, Vohra F. Bonding integrity and compressive strength of re-bonded, surface conditioned and Er Cr YSGG laser treated lithium disilicate ceramics. J Appl Biomat Func Mater 2020;18: 2280800020910954.
  20. Gasparik C, Culic B, Varvara MA, Grecu A, Burde A, Dudea D. Effect of accelerated staining and bleaching on chairside CAD/CAM materials with high and low translucency. Dent Mater J 2019;38:987-93. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-335
  21. Villarroel M, Fahl N, De Sousa AM, De Oliveira OB Jr. Direct esthetic restorations based on translucency and opacity of composite resins. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011;23:73-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00392.x
  22. Egilmez F, Ergun G, Cekic-Nagas I, Vallittu PK, Lassila LVJ. Comparative color and surface parameters of current esthetic restorative CAD/CAM materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2018;10:32-42. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.1.32
  23. Sagsoz O, Demirci T, Demirci G, Sagsoz NP, Yildiz M. The effects of different polishing techniques on the staining resistance of CAD/CAM resin-ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:417-22. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.6.417
  24. Lee YK. Translucency of human teeth and dental restorative materials and its clinical relevance. J Biomed Opt 2015;20:045002. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.20.4.045002
  25. Roselino L, Chinelatti MA, Alandia-Roman C, Pires-de-Souza F. Effect of brushing time and dentifrice abrasiveness on color change and surface roughness of resin composites. Brazilian Dent J 2015;26:507-13. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201300399
  26. Al Ben Ali A, Kang K, Finkelman MD, Zandparsa R, Hirayama H. The effect of variations in translucency and background on color differences in CAD/CAM lithium disilicate glass ceramics. J Prosthodont 2014;23:213-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12080
  27. Domingos PA, Garcia PP, Oliveira AL, Palma-Dibb RG. Composite resin color stability: influence of light sources and immersion media. J Appl Oral Sci 2011;19:204-11. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000300005
  28. Rajan VV, Ganapathy DM, Sheeba PS, Kanniappan N. Effects of tooth brushing on wear, surface roughness, and color stability of composite resins-a review. J Pharm Res 2018;12:95.

피인용 문헌

  1. Repair Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Aged Resin and Glass-Matrix CAD/CAM Ceramic Materials Using Two Different Repair Systems vol.11, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11111331