Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A comparison study on shear bond strength of 3D printed resin and conventional heat-cured denture base resin to denture relining materials

3D-프린팅 의치상 레진과 열중합 의치상 레진에서의 의치 첨상 재료 간의 전단결합강도 비교 연구

  • Cho, Sung-Yoon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Song, Young-Gyun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 조성윤 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 송영균 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2021.11.16
  • Accepted : 2021.12.04
  • Published : 2021.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of various 3D printed denture base resins and the conventional denture base resin to various denture relining materials. Materials and Methods: For denture base materials, a heatcured (Vertex RS) and two types of 3D printed DENTCA Denture base II, NextDentTM Base) were used. And 4 types denture relining materials (Tokuyama Rebase II fast, Kooliner, Denture Liner, Denture Liner, Lang Jet Denture Repair Kit) with different components were used. It was classified into 12 groups. Adhesion was performed between the resin base and the relining materials in accordance with ISO/TS 11405 standard. The shear bonding strength was measured, and then the adhesion interface was observed with a stereoscopic microscope and a scanning electron microscope. The fracture pattern was investigated through the analysis of the fragment. Results: In the 3D printed denture resin group, the shear bonding strength with relining materials was significantly lower than that of the heat-cured resin group (P < 0.05). The group of polymethyl methacrylate -based relining materials, high shear bonding strength was shown regardless of the type of denture. As for the fracture pattern, adhesive fracture appeared in most groups, and cohesive, mixed fracture appeared in some groups. Conclusion: The polymethyl methacrylate -based denture relining materials showed high shear bonding strength values compared to other denture relining materials. But, for direct methods, it is considered advantageous in terms of shear bonding strength to use a isobutyl methacrylate-based denture relining materials.

목적: 다양한 3D 프린팅 의치상 레진과 여러 가지 의치 첨상 재료 간의 전단결합강도를 평가하여 기존의 열중합 의치상 레진과의 전단결합강도를 비교 평가하고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 열중합레진(Vertex RS)과 3D프린팅 의치상 레진 두종(DENTCA Denture base II, NextDentTM Base)을 사용하였다. 의치 첨상 재료로는 성분이 다른 총 4종(Tokuyama Rebase II fast, Kooliner, Denture Liner, Denture Liner, Lang Jet Denture Repair Kit)을 사용하여 12개의 군으로 분류하였다. ISO/TS 11405규격에 따라 접착을 시행하였다. 전단결합강도를 측정하였고, 이후 입체현미경과 주사전자현미경을 이용하여 접착 계면을 관찰하고 파절편의 분석을 통하여 파절 양상을 조사하였다. 결과: 3D 프린팅 의치상 레진 군에서 의치 첨상 재료와의 전단결합강도가 열중합레진 군에 비해 유의하게 낮은 전단결합강도 결과를 나타내었다(P < 0.05). Polymethyl methacrylate계열의 첨상재료의 경우, 의치상종류와 관계없이 높은 전단결합강도를 보였다. 파절 양상은 대부분의 군에서 접착성 파절이 나타났고 일부 군에서 응집성 파절과 혼합성 파절 양상이 나타났다. 결론: Polymethyl methacrylate를 주성분으로 하는 의치 첨상 재료가 실험에 사용된 모든 의치상 레진에서 다른 의치 첨상 재료와 비교하여 높은 전단 결합강도 값을 나타내었지만, 직접법으로 의치 첨상을 시행할 경우 단량체로 Isobutyl methacrylate 성분의 의치 첨상재료를 사용하는 것이 전단결합강도면에서 유리할 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Zarb GA, Bolender CL. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. 12th ed. St. Louis; Mosby; 2004. p. 190-207.
  2. Baba NZ. Materials and processes for CAD/CAM complete denture fabrication. Curr Oral Health Rep 2016;3:203-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-016-0101-3
  3. Bidra AS, Tylor TD, Agar JR. Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures: systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:361-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60318-2
  4. Fasbinder DJ. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:22S-31S. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0395
  5. Kawahata N, Ono H, Nishi Y, Hamano T, Nagaoka E. Trial of duplication procedure for complete dentures by CAD/CAM. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:540-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00522.x
  6. Inokoshi M, Kanazawa M, Minakuchi S. Evaluation of a complete denture trial method applying rapid prototyping. Dent Mater J 2012;31:40-6. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-113
  7. Steinmassl PA, Klaunzer F, Steinmassl O, Dumfahrt H, Grunert I. Evaluation of currently available CAD/CAM denture systems. Int J Prosthodont 2017;30:116-22. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5031
  8. Goodacre CJ, Garbacea A, Naylor WP, Daher T, Marchack CB, Lowry J. CAD/CAM fabricated complete dentures: concepts and clinical methods of obtaining required morphological data. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107:34-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60015-8
  9. Kattadiyil MT, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ. CAD/ CAM complete dentures: a review of two commercial fabrication systems. J Calif Dent Assoc 2013;41:407-16.
  10. Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ, Kattadiyil MT. Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:249-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.02.017
  11. Ohkubo C, Park EJ, Kim TH, Kurtz KS. Digital Relief of the Mental Foramen for a CAD/CAMFabricated Mandibular Denture. J Prosthodont 2018;27:189-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12476
  12. Infante L, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy E. Fabricating complete dentures with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:351-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.014
  13. Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ, Kattadiyil MT. Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:249-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.02.017
  14. McLaughlin JB, Ramos V Jr. Complete denture fabrication with CAD/CAM record bases. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:493-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.017
  15. Maeda Y, Minoura M, Tsutsumi S, Okada M, Nokubi T. A CAD/CAM system for removable denture. Part I: Fabrication of complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:17-21.
  16. Kattadiyil MT, AlHelal A. An update on computerengineered complete dentures: A systematic review on clinical outcomes. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:478-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.017
  17. Dorner S, Zeman F, Koller M, Lang R, Handel G, Behr M. Clinical performance of complete dentures: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:410-7.
  18. Felton D, Cooper L, Duqum I, Minsley G, Guckes A, Haug S, Meredith P, Solie C, Avery D, Chandler ND, American College of Prosthodontists. Evidence-based guidelines for the care and maintenance of complete dentures: a publication of the American College of Prosthodontists. J Prosthodont 2011;20:S1-12.
  19. Bergman B, Carlsson GE. Clinical long-term study of complete denture wearers. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:56-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90066-6
  20. Fish EW. An analysis of the stabilizing factors in full denture construction. Br Dent J 1931;52:559-70.
  21. Jung CM. Atlas of Chairside Relining Technique. Seoul; Shinhung Int Inc.; 2001. p. 13-22.
  22. Chung CH. Complete denture prosthodontics. Seoul; Jisung; 1994. p. 496-9.
  23. Ogle RE, Sorensen SE, Lewis EA. A new visible light-cured resin system applied to removable prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:497-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90397-5
  24. Kim KS, Jeong HY, Kim YL, Cho HW. The effect of denture cleansers on the bond strength and the surface hardness of reline resin to denture base resin. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2003;41:493-502.
  25. Takahashi Y, Chai J. Assessment of shear bond strength between three denture reline materials and a denture base acrylic resin. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:531-5.
  26. Egilmez F, Ergun G, Cekic-Nagas I, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Does artificial aging affect mechanical properties of CAD/CAM composite materials. J Prosthodont Res 2018;62:65-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.06.001
  27. AlHelal A, AlRumaih HS, Kattadiyil MT, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ. Comparison of retention between maxillary milled and conventional denture bases: a clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:233-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.007
  28. Ortman HR, Ortman LF. Denture refitting with today's concepts and materials. Dent Clin North Am 1975;19:269-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-8532(22)01070-9
  29. Patil SB, Naveen BH, Patil NP. Bonding acrylic teeth to acrylic resin denture bases: a review. Gerodontology 2006;23:131-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2006.00129.x
  30. Craig RC. Restorative dental materials. 8th ed. St Louis; CV Mosby; 1989. p. 509-44.
  31. Phillips RW. Science of dental materials. 8th ed. Philadelphia; WB Saunders; 1982. p. 195-206.
  32. Lee S. Prospect for 3D printing technology in medical, dental, and pediatric dental field. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 2016;43:93-108. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2016.43.1.93
  33. Arima T, Murata H, Hamada T. Analysis of composition and structure of hard autopolymerizing reline resins. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:346-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1996.tb00863.x
  34. Vallittu PK, Ruyter IE. Swelling of poly(methyl methacrylate) resin at the repair joint. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:254-8.
  35. Park C, Kim MH, Go JS, Hong SM, Shin BS. A study on the comparison mechanical properties of 3D printing prototypes with laminating direction. J Korean Soc Manuf Technol Eng 2015;24:334-41.
  36. Strohaver RA. Comparison of changes in vertical dimension between compression and injection molded complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:716-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90599-4
  37. Mutluay MM, Ruyter IE. Evaluation of adhesion of chairside hard relining materials to denture base polymers. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:445-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.011
  38. Takahashi Y, Chai J. Shear bond strength of denture reline polymers to denture base polymers. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:271-5.
  39. Arima T, Murata H, Hamada T. Properties of highly cross-linked autopolymerizing reline resins. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:55-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80273-2
  40. Arima T, Murata H, Hamada T. Analysis of composition and structure of hard autopolymerizing reline resins. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:346-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1996.tb00863.x
  41. Li GZ, Cho H, Wang L, Toghiani H, Pittman CU Jr. Synthesis and properties of poly(isobutyl methacrylate- co-butanediol dimethacrylate-co-methacryl polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane) nanocomposites. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem 2005;43:355-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.20503
  42. Sarac YS, Sarac D, Kulunk T, Kulunk S. The effect of chemical surface treatments of different denture base resins on the shear bond strength of denture repair. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:259-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.05.024
  43. Digholkar S, Madhav VN, Palaskar J. Evaluation of the flexural strength and microhardness of provisional crown and bridge materials fabricated by different methods. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2016;16:328-34. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.191288
  44. Alharbi N, Osman R, Wismeijer D. Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of printed complete coverage interim dental restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:760-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.002