Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Management of complicated crown fracture by tooth fragment reattachment with fiber post: a case report

섬유 강화형 포스트를 이용한 치관 파절된 치아의 재부착: 증례보고

  • Kim, Yu-Ri (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Dental and Life Science Institute, School of Dentistry, Pusan University) ;
  • Jung, Kyoung-Hwa (Dental Clinic Center, Pusan National University Hospital) ;
  • Son, Sung-Ae (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Dental and Life Science Institute, School of Dentistry, Pusan University) ;
  • Park, Jeong-Kil (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Dental and Life Science Institute, School of Dentistry, Pusan University)
  • 김유리 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실, 치의학연구소, 치의생명과학연구소) ;
  • 정경화 (부산대학교병원 치과진료센터) ;
  • 손성애 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실, 치의학연구소, 치의생명과학연구소) ;
  • 박정길 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실, 치의학연구소, 치의생명과학연구소)
  • Received : 2021.08.19
  • Accepted : 2021.10.18
  • Published : 2021.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Dental trauma is very common in children and relatively young people, with the line of treatment depending on the time elapsed, age of the child, and tooth maturity. If the fractured segment is available and there is close approximation of the segment to the remaining tooth, reattachment of the fractured segment is a feasible option. This treatment offers several advantages, including the reestablishment of function, aesthetics, shape, shine and surface texture, in addition to the original contour and alignment of the teeth. The following cases present two different complex crown fracture cases that were treated using tooth fragment reattachment with fiber-reinforced composite post.

치아 외상은 어린이와 비교적 젊은 연령에서 흔히 발생하며 외상 발생 시점, 환자의 나이, 치아의 성숙 상태 등이 치료 방법에 영향을 미친다. 약 파절편이 건전하고 잔존 치아와 밀접한 적합을 보일 경우, 파절편 재부착은 유용한 치료 옵션이 될 수 있다. 이 방법은 치아 본래의 형태와 교합의 회복뿐만 아니라 기능, 표면 광택과 질감을 그대로 재현할 수 있는 여러 가지 이점이 있다. 본 증례보고는 복잡 치관 파절된 치아를 섬유 강화형 포스트를 활용하여 파절편 재부착을 시행한 두 증례에 대해 소개한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ameur MS, Kallel I, Chtioui F, Douki N. Tooth Fragment Reattachment with Glass Fiber Reinforced Post: A Case Report. J Pediatr Dent 2021;7:00-00.
  2. Akyuz SN, Erdemir A. Restoration of tooth fractures using fiber post and fragment reattachment: Three case reports. Eur J Gen Dent 2012;1:94-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-9626.103393
  3. Jyothi M, Jyothirmayi BSL, Sirisha K, Mounika A, Girish K, Sruthi Keerthi MH. Reattachment-Conservative management of complicated crown fractures in anterior teeth. Int J Appl Dent Sci 2016;2:10-3.
  4. Maitin N, Maitin SN, Rastogi K, Bhushan R. Fracture tooth fragment reattachment. BMJ Case Rep 2013;2013:bcr2013009183.
  5. Olsburgh S, JacobyT, Krejci I. Crown fractures in the permanent dentition: pulpal and restorative considerations. Dent Traumatol 2002;18:103-15. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2002.00004.x
  6. Aggarwal V, Logani A, Shah N. Complicated crown fractures-management and treatment options. Int Endod J 2009;42:740-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01588.x
  7. Hegde SG, Tawani GS, Warhadpande MM. Use of quartz fiber post for reattachment of complex crown root fractures: A 4-year follow-up. J Conserv Dent 2014;17:389-92. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.136519
  8. Bonchev A, Radeva E, Tsvetanova N. Fiber Reinforced Composite Posts-A Review of Literature. Int J Sci Res 2017;6:1887-93.
  9. Quintas AF, Dinato JC, Bottino MA. Aesthetic posts and cores for metal-free restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 2000;12:875-84.
  10. VichiA, Grandini S, Davidson CL, Ferrari M. An SEM evaluation of several adhesive systems used for bonding fiber posts under clinical conditions. Dent Mater 2002;18:495-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00065-3
  11. Hilton TJ, Summitt JB, Broome J, Ferracane JL. Summitt's fundamentals of operative dentistry: a contemporary approach. 4th ed. Batavia; Quintessence Pub Co.; 2013. p. 567-8.
  12. Macedo GV, Diaz PI, De O Fernandes CA, Ritter AV. Reattachment of anterior teeth fragments: A conservative approach. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008;20:5-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00142.x
  13. Reis A, Francci C, Loguercio AD, Carrilho MR, Rodriques Filho LE. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different techniques. Oper Dent 2001;26:287-94.
  14. Raut AW, Mantri V, Shambharkar VI, Mishra M. Management of complicated crown fracture by reattachment using fiber post: Minimal intervention approach. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2018;9:93-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/jnsbm.JNSBM_98_17
  15. Chazine M, Sedda M, Ounsi HF, Paragliola R, Ferrari M, Grandini S. Evaluation of the fracture resistance of reattached incisal fragments using different materials and techniques. Dent Traumatol 2011;27:15-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2010.00951.x
  16. Davis R, Overton JD. Efficacy of bonded and nonbonded amalgamin the treatment of teeth with incomplete fractures. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:469-78. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0203
  17. Santos VR, Lucchesi JA, Cortelli SC, Amaral CM, Feres M, Duarte PM. Effects of glass ionomer and microfilled composite subgingival restorations on periodontal tissue and subgingival biofilm: a 6-month evaluation. J Periodontol 2007;78:1522-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.070032
  18. Farik B, Munksgaard EC, Andreasen JO, Kreiborg S. Drying andrewetting anterior crown fragments prior to bonding. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999;15:113-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1999.tb00766.x
  19. Jalannavar P, Tavargeri A. Influence of storage media and durationof fragment in the media on the bond strength of the reattachedtooth fragment. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2018;11:83-8. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1490
  20. Poubel DLN, Almeida JCF, Dias Ribeiro AP, Maia GB, Martinez JMG, Garcia FCP. Effect of dehydration and rehydration intervalson fracture resistance of reattached tooth fragments using a multimode adhesive. Dent Traumatol 2017;33:451-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12344
  21. Madhubala A, Tewari N, Mathur VP, Bansal K. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance using two rehydration protocols for fragment reattachment in uncomplicated crown fractures. Dent Traumatol 2019;35:199-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12473
  22. Bourguignon C, Cohenca N, Lauridsen E, Flores MT, O'Connell AC, Day PF, Tsilingaridis G, Abbott PV, Fouad AF, Hicks L, Andreasen JO, Cehreli ZC, Harlamb S, Kahler B, Oginni A, Semper M, Levin L. International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 1. Fractures and luxations. Dent Traumatol 2020;36:314-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12578
  23. Sharmin DD, Thomas E. Evaluation of the effect of storage medium on fragment reattachment. Dent Traumatol 2013;29:99-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2012.01143.x
  24. Sapna CM, Priya R, Sreedevi NB, Rajan RR, Kumar R. Reattachment of fractured tooth fragment with fiber post: A case series with 1-year followup. Case Rep Dent 2014;2014:376267. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/376267
  25. Fernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:355-63.
  26. Mobilio N, Borelli B, Sorrentino R, Catapano S. Effect of fiber post length and bone level on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Mater J 2013;32:816-21. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-069