Educational Technology International

  • 제22권1호
  • /
  • Pages.57-85
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1598-5776(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2289-0300(eISSN)
한국교육공학회 (The Korean Society for Education Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyses on the Perception's Differences of Online Teaching Activity according to the Level of Self-Directed Learning in Higher Education Using the IPA Technique

  • 투고 : 2021.02.24
  • 심사 : 2021.04.13
  • 발행 : 2021.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study was to identify learners' perception of teaching activities in online classes that were forcibly switched due to COVID-19, and to compare and analyze differences in importance and performance of online teaching activities according to the level of self-directed learning in university students. To address these goals, 31 university students who took courses operated as online classes at university participated in this study, and the collected data were analyzed according to IPA procedures and methods. As a result, for online teaching activities, class attendance check and encouragement, clarity of class objectives, the ability to deliver the content of learning, and the ability of the instructor to deliver lectures were identified as factors to be constantly emphasized. Depending on the level of self-directed learning, there were significant differences between importance and performance in high level learners' interaction strategy with instructor, interaction strategy with learner, and timely provision of instructor's feedback. On the other hand, there was no significant difference between the importance and performance of online teaching activities for learners with a low level of self-directed learning. Based on these research results, several implications for the design of effective online teaching activities in future university education were proposed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bae, S. H. (2020). Corona 19's impact on Korean universities and futureTasks. Proceedings 2020 conference of Korean Educational Research Association.
  2. Cho, E. S. (2020). Untact classes in post COVID-19: The roles and challenges of educational technology. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 693-713. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.36.3.693
  3. Choi, K. A. (2009). Relationship between the use of learning strategies and adult learners' self-directedness in e-Learning. The Journal of Korean Education, 36(2), 137-163.
  4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  5. Dabbagh, N. (2007). The online learner : Characteristics and pedagogical implications. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3), 217-226.
  6. Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1-13.
  7. Gayton, J., & McEwen, B. C. (2007). Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640701341653
  8. Hong, S. Y., & Ryu, Y. J. (2020). Factors affecting college students' learning outcomes in non face-to-face environment during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 957-989. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.36.3.957
  9. Hong, S., & Jung, I. (2011). The distance learner competencies: A three-phased empirical approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(1), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9164-3
  10. Jin, S. H., Sung, E. M., & Kim, Y. Y. (2016). Learning activities and learning behaviors for learning analytics in e-Learning environments. Educational Technology International, 17(2). 175-202.
  11. Jeong, H. H., Roh, S, Z., Jung, J. W., & Cho, Y. H. (2020). The challenge of the spread of COVID-19 to education: High quality remote learning for everyone. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 645-669. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.36.3.645
  12. Joung, Y., Han. S., & Park, J. (2016). A study of awareness on success factors in eLearning course of participants of Korea-ASEAN cyber university. Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 955-986. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.32.4.955
  13. Ju, Y. G., Park, D. S., Jung, K. H., Son, S. R., & Jing, Q. (2020). One semester on online: The lesson of digital face to face classes' experience. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 805-838. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.36.3.805
  14. Jung, I. S, & Rha, I. J. (2004). Understanding of distance education. Seoul: Kyoyookbook.
  15. Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning. New York: Association Press.
  16. Lee, D. J. & Kim, Misook. (2020). University students' perceptions on the practices of online learning in the COVID-19 situation and future directions. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 359-377.
  17. Lee, E. K. (2013). Effects of self-directed learning and social presence of online adult learners to learning outcomes. Journal of Lifelong Education, 19(4), 27-50.
  18. Lee, J. M (2011). What drives a successful e-Learning: Focusing on the critical factors influencing e-Learning satisfaction. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 24(4), 2245-2257.
  19. Lee, J. Y., Sung, E. M., Lee, J. E., Lim, K, Y., & Han, S. Y. (2020). Challenges and tasks facing online classes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 671-692. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.36.3.671
  20. Martilla, J. A,, & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77-79. https://doi.org/10.2307/1250495
  21. Martin, F. & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning 22(1), 205-222.
  22. Min, H. (2020). Status and Analysis of Non face-to-face Education at Seoul National University. The issues of higher education due to Covid 19. 7th Gwanak Education Forum(2020. July 1).
  23. Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (2020). 2019 Survey of Korean e-Learning industry.
  24. Moore, M. & Kersely, G. (2005). Distance education. CA: Thomson Learning, Inc.
  25. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A system view. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
  26. Park, K. S., & Sung, E. M. (2012). The Influence of students' perception of instructional performances on learning motivation, learning attitude, and learning satisfaction in a higher education Context. Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2), 231-257. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.28.2.231
  27. Rha. I. J. (1999). Web-based instruction. Seoul: Kyoyookbook.
  28. Sung, E. M., Chae, Y. J., & Lee, S. H. (2019). Analysis of types and characteristics of self-directed learning of learners in online software education. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 22(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.32431/KACE.2019.22.1.004
  29. Sung, E. M., & Choi, H. S. (2016). Exploring the factors of self-directed learning competency of the highest academic-achievement learners in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 427-452. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.32.2.427
  30. Sung, E. M., Choi, J. E., & Baek, M. J. (2021). A study on development for teaching and learning model of online project-based learning in untact Context. Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 33(1), 227-270. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2021.202
  31. Sung, E. M., Jin, S. J., & Yoo, M. N. (2016). Exploring learning data for supporting self-directed learning in the perspective of learning analytics. Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 453-2499. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.32.3.453
  32. Zimmerman, B. J., & Risemberg, R. (1997) Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 73-101. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0919