Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집)

Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Prestress Loss in Prestressing Reinforcing Units using Steel Bar and Pipe

강봉 및 강관을 이용한 프리스트레싱 유닛의 긴장 응력 손실 평가

  • 심재일 (한국방재안전기술) ;
  • 문주현 (경기대학교 스마트시티공학부 건축공학전공)
  • Received : 2021.06.01
  • Accepted : 2021.07.08
  • Published : 2021.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine the loss of prestressing stress in the developed prestressing reinforcing units using steel bar and pipe (SP). The main parameters were the reinforcing bar type, the magnitude of prestressed force, and prestressing method. The test results showed that the loss of prestressing stress for SP was highest in the initial prestressing step, which was higher for the compression introduction typed specimens than tension introduction typed specimens. The loss of prestressing stress of SP made with P800 was 1.6% for the compression introduction typed specimen with 0.8fy, which was lowest than the other specimens. Meanwhile, the relaxation of SP with the respect to the time ranged between 0.4 and 1.9%, irrespective of SP material type, the magnitude of prestressed force, and prestressing method. These values were less than 2.5%, which is the maximum value for the relaxation of prestressed reinforcing steel bars in design codes. Consequently, considering the loss of stress developed in the initial prestressing step, the developed SP material type, prestressing introduction method, and magnitude are recommended to be P800, compression introduction type, and 0.8fy.

이 연구의 목적은 강관과 강봉을 이용하여 프리스트레스력의 도입이 가능하도록 개발된 프리스트레싱(prestressing reinforcing units using steel bar and pipe, 이하 SP) 보강재의 응력손실을 확인하는데에 있다. 주요변수는 SP 보강재의 종류, 프리스트레스력의 크기 및 도입방법이다. 실험결과 SP 보강재의 응력손실은 프리스트레스력이 직접 도입하는 초기단계에서 가장 크게 있었는데, 그 크기는 압축도입형 보다 인장도입형에서 더 크게 있었다. SP 보강재의 응력손실은 프리스트레스력이 항복강도의 80%로 도입된 P800 강종인 압축도입형 실험체에서 1.6%로 가장 낮았다. 한편 시간경과에 따른 SP 보강재의 릴랙세이션은 압축도입형의 경우 SP 보강재의 종류, 프리스트레스력의 크기에 관계없이 0.4~1.9%로 평가되었는데, 이는 설계기준들에서 제시하고 있는 릴랙세이션 2.5% 이하를 만족하는 수준이었다. 결과적으로 프리스트레스력 도입 즉시 발생하는 응력손실을 감안할 때에 개발된 SP 보강재의 재질과 프리스트레스력 도입방식 및 크기는 각각 P800, 압축도입형 및 항복강도의 80%로 추천된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 국토교통부/국토교통과학기술진흥원의 지원으로 수행되었습니다(과제번호21CTAP-C157662-02).

References

  1. ASTM A416 (2018), Standard Specification for Low-Relaxation, Seven-Wire Steel Strand for Prestressed Concrete. ASTM International, PA, USA.
  2. Collins, M. P. (1991), Prestressed Concrete Structures, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  3. JIS G3536 (2014), Steel Wires and Strands for Prestressed Concrete. Japanese Standards Association, Tokyo, Japan.
  4. Kim, J. K., and Yang, J. M. (2019), Ultra-High Strength Steel Strand and Prestressed Concrete Using the Strand, Magazine of the Korea Concrete Institute, 31(4), 21-17. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2019.31.1.021
  5. Kim, W. H., Ra, J. K., Kim, T. H., and Shin, H. M. (2003), Analytical Study on the Prestress Losses of Prestressed Concrete Bridges, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 7(1), 131-138. (in Korean, with English abstract)
  6. KS D 7002 (2019), Uncoated Stress-Relieved Steel Wires and Strands for Prestressed Concrete. Korea Agency for Technology and Standards, Seoul, Korea.
  7. Lee, J. H. (2009), Time-Dependant Analysis of Precas Prestressed Concrete Bridge considering Long-Time Prestress Loss, Master's thesis, Daegu, Kyungpool University, Department of Civil Engineering.
  8. Lim, Y. J., and Kim, H. S. (2020), Effect of Outrigger Wall Reinforced with Post Tension on Reducing Differential Column Shortening, Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea, 33(4), 237-244. (in Korean, with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.7734/COSEIK.2020.33.4.237
  9. Nam, Y. S., Cho, C. G., and Park, M. H. (2006), Time-Dependent Behavior Analysis of Pre-Tensioned Members Using High-Performance Concrete (HPC), Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, 18(4), 479-487. (in Korean, with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2006.18.4.479
  10. Architectural Insitute of Korea (2016), Korean Building Code, Architectural Institute of Korea, Korea, Seoul.