DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Use Of Elements Of Innovative Pedagogical Technologies In Educational Activities

  • Barba, Ihor (Department of the Cinema and Television Arts, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts) ;
  • Riazantsev, Lev (Department of the Cinema and Television Arts, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts) ;
  • Koturha, Oleh (Department of the Cinema and Television Arts, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts) ;
  • Poliakov, Serhii (Department of the Cinema and Television Arts, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts) ;
  • Bondarets, Nadiia (Department of the Cinema and Television Arts, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts)
  • Received : 2021.12.05
  • Published : 2021.12.30

Abstract

The article considers the position of scientists on the concept of "pedagogical technology", identifies the signs of pedagogical technology and existing classifications, considers non-traditional (innovative) learning technologies, as well as their practical forms of application in the educational process, summarizes the results, makes recommendations for the practical application of the studied material. The article considered the basic concepts of pedagogical technology, as well as some types of non-traditional (innovative) teaching technologies. Also, examples of the use of some elements of innovative technologies in practical educational activities are given. The choice of specific non-traditional pedagogical technologies is determined by the target orientation, content specificity, individualization of training, technical equipment of the educational institution, etc.

Keywords

References

  1. Corrall, S. (1998). Key skills for students in higher education. SCONUL Newsletter, 15, 25-29.
  2. Fundamentals of scientific research: textbook. manual.Ed. V.S. Marcina. Lviv: Romus-Poligraf, 2002. 128 p.
  3. Meera N. S. Quality education for all? A case study of a New Delhi government school, Policy futures in education, 2015, No 13 (3), pp. 360-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210315569042
  4. Yagupov VV Pedagogy: textbook. way.Yagupov VV K .: Lybid, 2002, 560 p.
  5. Alfred P. Rovai, Linda D. Grooms The relationship of personalitybased learning style preferences and learning among online graduate students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. - 2004. - No16, Issue 1. - pp 30-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02960281
  6. Andrea Santo-Sabato, Marta Vernaleone From the First Generation of Distance Learning to Personal Learning Environments: An Overall Look. ELearning, E-Education, and Online Training. - 2014. - No138. - C. 155-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13293-8_19
  7. Shapiro, J., & Hughes, S. K. (1996). Information literacy as a liberal art: Enlightenment proposals for a new curriculum. EDUCOM Review, 31(2), 31-35.
  8. McMillan R. Man Builds Twitter Bot That Humans Actually Like. Wired. URL: wired.com/2012/06/twitter_arm/
  9. Mason, R. Globalising Education: Trends and Applications. London: Routledge, 1998. P. 37.
  10. Biddiscombe, R. (1999). Developing the learning support role: Some of the challenges ahead. SCONUL Newsletter, 16, 30-34.
  11. Iasechko, M., Shelukhin, O., Maranov, A. Evaluation of The Use of Inertial Navigation Systems to Improve The Accuracy of Object Navigation. International Journal Of Computer Science And Network Security, 21:3, 2021, p. 71-75. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.3.10
  12. Dordick H.S., Wang G. The Information Society: A Retrospective View. Newbury Park - L., - 1993.
  13. Iasechko, M., Iasechko, S., Smyrnova, I. Aspectos pedagogicos do autodesenvolvimento de alunos de educacao a distancia na Ucrania. Laplage Em Revista, 7(Extra-B), 2021, p.316-323. https://doi.org/10.24115/S2446-622020217Extra-B929p.316-323