Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems (한국산업정보학회논문지)

Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems (한국산업정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effective communication method for e-learning under the COVID-19 pandemic: Focusing on ITO

코로나19 기간 중의 비대면 온라인 교육의 효과적인 커뮤니케이션 방안 연구: ITO를 중심으로

  • Received : 2020.12.26
  • Accepted : 2021.01.16
  • Published : 2021.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Both universities and professors are eagerly seeking effective communication method for e-learning under the COVID-19 pandemic. In order to achieve this goal, it is necessary to understand the differences in requirements according to the characteristics of students. In this study, the relationship between the demographic characteristics of learners and important/preferred types and methods of communication in terms of learning or expression of opinion was analyzed through chi-square tests. The results showed that communication importances/preferences vary significantly based on learner's characteristics.

코로나19으로 인해 준비되지 않은 상황에서 전면적인 비대면 온라인 교육을 실시중인 대학가에서는 효과적인 학습자-교수자 상호간 커뮤니케이션 방안을 찾고자 노력하고 있다. 이를 위해서는 비대면 온라인 교육의 특성을 이해하고, 수요자의 특성에 따른 요구사항의 차이를 알아둘 필요가 있다. 본 연구에서는 학습자의 인구통계학적 특성과 학습 또는 의사전달 측면에서 중요하거나 선호하는 커뮤니케이션 유형 및 방법 간의 상호관련성을 카이제곱(chi-square) 검정을 통해 분석하였다. 분석 결과 학습자 특성별로 중요도/선호도가 유의하게 다른 것으로 입증되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, J. (2008). Study on the Cause of the Efficient Learning to the Cyber Classroom: With Special Reference Incomparison with the Off-line Classroom and the Cyber Classroom from a Communicative Perspective, Journal of Cybercommunication Academic Society, 25(3), 85-124.
  2. Al-Jumeily, D., Williams, D., Hussain, A. and Griffiths, P. (2010). Can We Truly Learn from a Cloud or Is It Just a Lot of Thunder?, Developments in E-systems Engineering Conference, Sep. 6-8, Lond on, UK, pp. 131-139.
  3. Al-Ghamdi, A., Samarji, A. and Anthony, W. (2016). Essential Considerations in Distance Education in KSA: Teacher Immediacy in a Virtual Teaching and Learning Environment, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(1), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.651
  4. Brown, J. and Adler, R. (2008). Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0, Educause Review, 43(1), 16-20.
  5. Cai, R. and Wang, Q (2020). A Six-step Online Teaching Method Based on Protocol-guided Learning during the COVID-19 Epidemic: A Case Study of the First Middle School Teaching Practice in Changyuan City, Henan Province, China, Best Evidence of Chinese Education, 4(2), 529-534. https://doi.org/10.15354/bece.20.rp010
  6. Han, T. and Kwak D. (2006). e-Learning and u-Learning, Seoul, KGIT.
  7. Joo, Y., Kim, S. and Kim, N. (2008). Relationship between Self-efficacy, Online Task Value and Self-regulated Learning, and Satisfaction and Achievement in Cyber Education, Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 14(3), 115-135.
  8. KEDI (2020). Educational Policy Responding to Post-COVID-19 (Distance Learning), www.kedi.re.kr (Accessed on Dec. 9th, 2020).
  9. Kim, J. (2019). A Study on Balanced Team Formation Method Reflecting Characteristics of Students, Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research, 24(6), 55-65.
  10. Kim, B. and Han, S. (2020). A Study on Satisfaction with Involuntary University Online Lecture by Corona 19, The Journal of General Education, 13, 7-31. https://doi.org/10.24173/jge.2020.10.13.1
  11. Kim, B. and Kim Y. (2018). A Study on Structural Relationships among Academic Achievement Variables for Smart Learning Performance, Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research, 23(2), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.9723/JKSIIS.2018.23.2.053
  12. Kim, D. and Kim, J. (2020). Satisfaction and Continuance Usage for University Online Class Systems: An Expectation-Confirmation Model, The 2nd Korean Academic Society of Business Administration Convergence Conference, Aug. 17-19, Incheon, South Korea. pp. 227-237.
  13. Lee, E. (2012). Clustering the Learner's Changes and Patterns of Perception on Obstacles to Online Course, Educational Technology International, 28(3), 559-585. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.28.3.559
  14. Lee, D. (2017). The effects of Educational Service Quality and Participation Intention on Educational Performance through a Case of Action Learning, Journal Korean Socity Quality Management, 45(4), 847-866.
  15. Lee, D. and Lee, D. (2020a). Healthcare Service Justice and Community Engagement in Crisis Situation: Focusing on Failure Cases in Response to COVID-19, Journal of the Korea Service Management Society, 21(2), 293-312. https://doi.org/10.15706/jksms.2020.21.2.013
  16. Lee, S. and Lee, D. (2020b). Lessons Learned from Battling COVID-19: The Korean Experience, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20), 1-20
  17. Lee, D. and Lee, S. (2020c). Measuring Inter-industry Convergence using Structural Holes Theory: Focusing on ICT Industries, Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research, 25(3), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.9723/JKSIIS.2020.25.3.011
  18. Lee, S. and Lee, D. (2020d). 4th Industrial Revolution Age and Operations Management Innovation, Seoul, Han-kyung publishing.
  19. Leem, J. and Ahn, S. (2014). A Qualitative Study on Educational Usefulness and Problems of Smartpad-based Instruction in Elementary School, Journal of The Korean of Information Education, 18(1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.1.75
  20. Leem, J. and Jung, I. (1998). Cognitive and Psychological Changes of a Learner during the Process of Interaction in a Web-based Instruction: A Case Study, Educational technology international, 14(3), 331-352. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.14.3.331
  21. Moller, L. (1998). Designing Communities of Learners for Asynchronous Distance Education, Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(4), 1042-1629 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299678
  22. Moore, M., and Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance Education, Belmont, Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  23. Nguyen, L., Barton, S. and Nguyen, L. (2015). iPads in Higher Education - Hype and Hope, British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 190-230 https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12137
  24. Pocatilu, P., Alecu, F. and Vetrici, M. (2010). Cloud Computing Benefits for e-Learning Solutions, Economics of Knowledge, 2(1), 9-14.
  25. Stappenbelt, B. (2017). Action Learning in Undergraduate Engineering Thesis Supervision, Journal of Technology and Science Education, 7(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.224
  26. UNESCO (2020). COVID-19 Impact on Education, https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse (Accessed on Dec. 9th, 2020).
  27. Viswanath, K., Kusuma, S. and Gupta, S. (2012). Cloud Computing Issues and Benefits Modern Education, Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology Cloud & Distributed, 12(10), 1-7.
  28. Zhou, L., Wu, S., Zhou, M. and Li, F. (2020). School's Out, but Class's On, the Largest Online Education in the World Today: Taking China's Practical Exploration during the COVID-19 Epidemic Prevention and Control as an Example, Best Evidence of Chinese Education, 4(2), 501-519. https://doi.org/10.15354/bece.20.ar023