DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Carbon Literacy on Education in Connection with SDGs of the Pre-service Earth Science Teachers

SDGs 연계 교육에서 예비 지구과학 교사들의 탄소 소양

  • Received : 2021.11.27
  • Accepted : 2021.12.28
  • Published : 2021.12.30

Abstract

This study is a basic research to apply ESD linked to SDGs to pre-service teachers majoring in earth science education. The purpose of this study is to evaluate carbon literacy by analyzing the awareness, attitude and knowledge, subjective norms, and behavioral control of the carbon footprint internalized by pre-service teachers. Pre-service teachers recognize the carbon footprint as their responsibility, but are not willing to pay the cost and accept inconveniences of the actions to reduce carbon footprint. They also support actions to reduce carbon footprint, but do not demand the actions from others. While they have sufficient knowledge about carbon mitigation actions, their conception of causes and effects of global warming is unstable. Pre-service teachers will go out to school sites and teach millions of students about global warming. It is essential to educate these teachers on the economic cost and social responsibility of reducing their carbon footprints. It is also important to find ways to bridge the gap between their thought and action. It is hoped that this study on pre-service teachers' carbon literacy will lead to realizing ESD.

본 연구는 지구과학교육을 전공하는 예비교사들에게 SDGs(지속가능발전목표)와 연계된 ESD(지속가능발전교육)을 적용하기 위한 기초 연구이다. 연구의 목적은 예비교사가 내면화 하고 있는 탄소발자국에 대한 인식과 태도 및 지식, 주관적 규범 및 행동 통제를 분석하여 탄소 소양을 평가하는 것이다. 예비교사들은 탄소 발자국을 자신의 책임으로 인식하고 있지만, 비용을 지불하고 불편을 감수하는데 소극적인 이중적 태도를 갖고 있다. 또한 탄소 발자국을 줄이기 위한 행동을 지지하지만, 요구하지는 않는다. 탄소 저감 행동에 대한 상식은 충분한 반면, 지구 온난화의 원인과 결과에 대한 개념은 불안정하다. 예비교사들은 학교 현장으로 배출되어 수많은 학생들에게 지구 온난화 문제를 가르치게 될 것이다. 따라서 탄소 발자국을 줄이는 경제적 비용과 사회적 책임에 대한 소양 교육이 필수적이며, 생각과 행동 사이의 간극을 메울 수 있는 방법을 찾아야 할 것이다. 예비교사들의 탄소 소양(carbon literacy)에 대한 연구로부터 ESD로 이어지는 교육이 실현되기를 바란다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2020S1A5A8046001).

References

  1. Cheong, C., & Kim, Y. J. (2021). The perceptions of non-scientific college students about the future global environment. Journal of Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 14(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2021.14.1.21
  2. Choi, I. S. (2015). College students' perception of climate change policies: Focused on carbon tax. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 5(6), 531-538.
  3. Dosa, K., & Russ, R. S. (2020). Making sense of carbon footprints: how carbon literacy and quantitative literacy affects information gathering and decision-making. Environmental Education Research, 26(3), 421-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1569205
  4. Howell, R. A. (2018). Carbon management at the household level: A definition of carbon literacy and three mechanisms that increase it. Carbon Management, 9(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2017.1409045
  5. IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. In Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri, & A. Reisinger (Eds.), Contribution of Working Group I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (p. 104). IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.
  6. IPCC. (2013). Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. In T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G. K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, & P. M. Midgley (Eds.), Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
  7. IPCC. (2018). Global warming of 1.5℃. In V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H. O. Portner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Pean, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, & T. Waterfield (Eds.), An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5℃ above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty (p. 32). World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  8. Jho, H. K. (2012). Perceptions of pre-service elementary teachers about the global warming through classroom discussion. The Korea Society of Energy and Climate Change Education, 2(1), 31-39.
  9. Kim, Y. J. (2021). Carbon footprint awareness on education in connection with SDGs of the pre-service teachers. Journal of Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 14(2), 146-158. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2021.14.2.146
  10. Lim, H. J., Choi, S. Y., Park, H. Y., & Yeo, S. I. (2019). Understanding of applicants for science gifted education on the phenomena and problems of global warming. The Korea Society of Energy and Climate Change Education, 9(3), 293-301.
  11. Lin, S. (2016). Reducing students' carbon footprints using personal carbon footprint management system based on environmental behavioural theory and persuasive technology. Environmental Education Research, 22(5), 658-682. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1018142
  12. Treptow, R. S. (2010). Carbon footprint calculations: An application of chemical principles. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(2), 168-171. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed8000528
  13. UNESCO. (2019). Education for Sustainable development goats: Learning objectives. p. 67.
  14. Whitmarsh, L., O'Neill, S., Seyfang, G., & Lorenzoni, I. (2009). Carbon capability: What does it mean, how prevalent is it, and how can we promote it? Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich, p. 132.
  15. Yoon, H. G., Kim, M. J., Boyes, E., Stanisstreet, M., & Skamp, K. (2011). Understanding students' beliefs about actions and willingness to act on global warming in Korea and Singapore. Journal of Korean Society of Science Education, 31(2), 181-197.