Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제77권1호
  • /
  • Pages.115-135
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigating the effects of span arrangements on DDBD-designed RC buildings under the skew seismic attack

  • 투고 : 2020.02.18
  • 심사 : 2020.09.29
  • 발행 : 2021.01.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This paper focuses on examining the effects of span arrangements on displacement responses of plan-symmetric RC frame buildings designed using the direct displacement-based design (DDBD) method by employing non-linear analyses and the skew seismic attack. In order to show the desired performance of DDBD design approach, the force-based design approach is also used to examine the seismic performance of the selected structures. To realize this objective, 8-story buildings with different plans are selected. In addition, the dynamic behavior of the structures is evaluated by selecting 3, 7, and 12-story buildings. In order to perform non-linear analyses, OpenSees software is used for modeling buildings. Results of an experimental model are used to validate the analytical model implemented in OpenSees. The results of non-linear static and non-linear dynamic analyses indicate that changing span arrangements does not affect estimating the responses of structures designed using the DDBD approach, and the results are more or less the same. Next, in order to apply the earthquake in non-principle directions, DDBD structures, designed for one-way performance, are designed again for two-way performance. Time history analyses are performed under a set of artificial acceleration pairs, applied to structures at different angles. It is found that the mean maximum responses of earthquakes at all angles have very good agreement with the design-acceptable limits, while the response of buildings along the height direction has a relatively acceptable and uniform distribution. Meanwhile, changes in the span arrangements did not have a significant effect on displacement responses.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abebe, B.H. and Lee, J.S. (2019), "Accounting for torsional response in direct displacement-based design of plan-asymmetric reinforced concrete frame buildings", KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 23(3), 1190-1206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-1739-x.
  2. Ali, Q., Ahmad, N., Ashraf, M., Rashid, M. and Schacher, T. (2017), "Shake table tests on single-story dhajji dewari traditional buildings", Int. J. Archit. Herit., 11(7), 1046-1059. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2017.1338789.
  3. Alimohammadi, D. and Izadi Zaman Abadi, E. (2019), "Evaluation of seismic design approach on RC/MR building using different probabilistic methods", 8th International Conference on Seismology & Earthquake Engineering, Tehran, Iran, November.
  4. Bracci, J.M., Reinhorn, A.M. and Mander, J.B. (1992), "Seismic resistance of reinforced concrete frame structures designed only for gravity loads-Part I: Design and properties of a 1/3 scale model structure", NCEER-92-0027, University at Buffalo, the State University of New York, USA.
  5. Bracci, J.M., Reinhorn, A.M. and Mander, J.B. (1995), "Seismic resistance of reinforced concrete frame structures designed for gravity loads: performance of structural system", ACI Mater. J., 92(5), 597-609. https://doi.org/10.14359/909.
  6. Crisafulli, F., Reboredo, A. and Torrisi, G. (2004), "Consideration of torsional effects in the displacement control of ductile buildings", 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, August.
  7. Dilmac, H. (2020), "Preliminary assessment approach to predict seismic vulnerability of existing low and mid-rise RC buildings", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 18(7), 3101-3133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00809-z.
  8. Dilmac, H., Ulutas, H., Tekeli, H. and Demir, F. (2018), "The investigation of seismic performance of existing RC buildings with and without infill walls", Comput. Concr., 22(5), 439-447. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2018.22.5.439.
  9. Emami, A.R. and Halabian, A.M. (2015), "Spatial distribution of ductility demand and damage index in 3D RC frame structures considering directionality effects", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 24(16), 941-961. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1219.
  10. Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2009), "Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors", FEMA P695, Washington, DC.
  11. Fox, M.J., Sullivan, T.J. and Beyer, K. (2015), "Evaluation of seismic assessment procedures for determining deformation demands in RC wall buildings", Earthq. Struct., 9(4), 911-936. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.4.911.
  12. Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistance Design of Buildings Standard No. 2800, (2015), Iranian Seismic Code, fourth edition, Building and Housing Research Center, Persian, Tehran, Iran.
  13. Izadi Zaman Abadi, E. and Moghadam, A.S. (2015), "Two important issues relevant to torsional response of asymmetric 8-story RC building designed with direct displacement based design approach", Int. J. Eng., 28(9), 1257-1267.
  14. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N. and Park, R. (1988), "Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete", J. Struct. Eng., 114(8), 1804-1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)
  15. McKenna, F., Fenves, G.L. and Scott, M.H. (2016), "OpenSees: open system for earthquake engineering simulation", Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
  16. Muljati, I., Asisi, F. and Willyanto, K. (2015), "Performance of force based design versus direct displacement based design in predicting seismic demands of regular concrete special moment resisting frames", Procedia Eng., 125, 1050-1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.161.
  17. Nievas, C.I. and Sullivan, T.J. (2015), "Applicability of the direct displacement-based design method to steel moment resisting frames with setbacks", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 13(12), 3841-3870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9787-1.
  18. Paparoa, A. and Beyer, K. (2015), "Development of a displacement-based design approach for modern mixed RCURM wall structures", Earthq. Struct., 9(4), 789-830. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.4.789.
  19. Paulay, T. (1996), "Seismic design for torsional response of ductile buildings", Bull. New Zeal. Natl. Soc. Earthq. Eng., 29(3), 178-196. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.29.3.178-198
  20. Pettinga, J.D. and Priestley, M.J.N. (2005), "Dynamic behaviour of reinforced concrete frames designed with direct displacement-based design", J. Earthq. Engin., 9(spec02), 309-330. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363246905002419
  21. Pettinga, J.D. and Priestley, M.J.N. (2007), Accounting for P-delta Effects in Structures When Using Direct Displacement-based Design, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
  22. Powell, G.H. (2008), "Displacement-based seismic design of structures", Earthq. Spectra, 24(2), 555-557. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2932170.
  23. Priestley, M.J.N. and Kowalsky, M.J. (2000), "Direct displacement-based seismic design of concrete buildings", Bull. New Zeal. Natl. Soc. Earthq. Eng., 33(4), 421-444. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.33.4.421-444
  24. Priestley, N. (2007), Fundamentals of Direct Displacement-Based Seismic Design and Assessment, Adv. Earthq. Eng. Anal., 133-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-74214-3_8.
  25. Sahoo, D.R. and Prakash, A. (2019), "Seismic behavior of concentrically braced frames designed using direct displacement-based method", Int. J. Steel Struct., 19(1), 96-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0092-0.
  26. Salajegheh, P., Shojaee, S., Salajegheh, E. and Khatibinia, M. (2014), "Reliability-based seismic assessment of asymetric multi-storey buildings with RC shear walls", Asian J. Civ. Eng., 15(2), 155-168.
  27. Salawdeh, S. and Goggins, J. (2016a), "Direct displacement based seismic design for single storey steel concentrically braced frames", Earthq. Struct., 10(5), 1125-1141. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.5.1125.
  28. Salawdeh, S. and Goggins, J. (2016b), "Performance based design approach for multi-storey concentrically braced steel frames", Steel Compos. Struct., 20(4), 749-776. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.20.4.749.
  29. Shibata, A. and Sozen, M.A. (1976), "Substitute-structure method for seismic design in R/C", J. Struct. Div., 102(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0004250
  30. Suarez, L.E. and Montejo, L.A. (2005), "Generation of artificial earthquakes via the wavelet transform", Int. J. Solids Struct., 42(21-22), 5905-5919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.03.025.
  31. Sullivan, T.J. and Lago, A. (2012), "Towards a simplified direct DBD procedure for the seismic design of moment resisting frames with viscous dampers", Eng. Struct., 35, 140-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.11.010.
  32. Sullivan, T.J., Priestley, M.J.N. and Calvi, G.M. (2012), A Model Code for the Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures DBD12, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
  33. Tekeli, H., Dilmac, H., Demir, F., Gencoglu, M. and Guler, K. (2017), "Shear stress indicator to predict seismic performance of residential RC buildings", Comput. Concr., 19(3), 283-291. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2017.19.3.283.
  34. Yakut, A. (2004), "Preliminary seismic performance assessment procedure for existing RC buildings", Eng. Struct., 26(10), 1447-1461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.05.011.