DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors to Affect Acceptance of Open Banking from Information Security Perspectives

정보보호 관점에서의 오픈뱅킹 수용도에 대한 영향요인

  • 고정현 (동국대학교 핀테크블록체인학과) ;
  • 이원부 (동국대학교 핀테크블록체인학과)
  • Received : 2021.11.15
  • Accepted : 2021.12.10
  • Published : 2021.12.31

Abstract

Joint financial network of Korea Financial Telecommunications and Clearings Institute, which is an essential facility with a natural monopoly, maintained its closedness as monopoly/public utility model, but it has evolved in the form of open banking in order to obtain domestic fintech competitiveness in the rapidly changing digital financial ecosystem such as the acceleration of Big Blur. In accordance with digital transformation strategy of financial institutions, various ICT companies are actively participating in the financial industries, which has been exclusive to banks, through the link technology called Open API. For this reason, there has been a significant change in the financial service supply chain in which ICT companies participate as users. The level of security in the financial service supply chain is determined based on the weakest part of the individual components according to the law of minimum. In addition, there is a perceived risk of personal information and financial information leakage among the main factors that affect users' intention to accept services, and appropriate protective measures against perceived security risks can be a catalyst, which increases the acceptance of open banking. Therefore, this is a study on factors affecting the introduction of open banking to achieve financial innovation by developing an open banking security control model for financial institutions, as a protective measures to user organizations, from the perspectives of cyber financial security and customer information protection, respectively, and surveying financial security experts. It is expected, from this study, that effective information protection measures will be derived to protect the rights and interests of financial customers and will help promote open banking.

Keywords

References

  1. 고제욱, 고형석, 남상완, 한경석, "블록체인 채택에 영향을 미치는 요인 관련 개선된 연구모델 제시를 위한 실증연구", 한국디지털콘텐츠학회논문지, 제20권, 제3호, 2019, 513-526.
  2. 권남훈, 김인석, "국내 오픈뱅킹 안전성 강화 및 이용자 보호를 위한 규제 개선 방안", 한국융합보안학회, 제20권, 제2호, 2020, 37-52.
  3. 권흥진, "오픈뱅킹 도입성과와 발전방향", 한국금융연구원 주간금융 브리프, 제29권, 제17호, 2020, 3-12.
  4. 금융결제원, "오픈뱅킹 공동업무 추진현황", 2019.
  5. 금융보안원, "금융권 오픈API 이용기관 자체 보안점검 가이드", 2019.
  6. 금융보안원, "오픈뱅킹 관련 보안점검 주요내용", 2019.
  7. 금융위원회, "글로벌핀테크 규제환경 분석과 개선방향", 2019a.
  8. 금융위원회, "핀테크 및 금융플랫폼 활성화를 위한 금융결제 인프라 혁신방안", 2019b.
  9. 금융위원회, "해외 유망 핀테크기업 비즈니스 모델", 2019.
  10. 금융위원회, "제3차 디지털금융협의회, 오픈뱅킹 고도화 방안", 2020.
  11. 김병곤, 김기원, 서홍일, "모바일 앱 서비스 특성이 사용자 만족과 지속적 사용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인", Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management, 제26권, 제3호, 2020, 99-120.
  12. 김상훈, 이갑수, "정보보안기술 사용의 영향요인에 관한 실증적 연구", 한국전자거래학회지, 제20권, 제4호, 2015, 151-175. https://doi.org/10.7838/JSEBS.2015.20.4.151
  13. 배병렬, Amos21 구조방정식모델링-원리와 실제, 청람, 2011.
  14. 배재권, "빅데이터 환경에서 개인정보유출 위협이 정보보호행위에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", e-비즈니스연구, 제17권, 제3호, 2016, 191-208.
  15. 서광규, "TAM과 VAM을 적용한 기업의 클라우드 서비스 채택의도의 영향요인 분석", 디지털융복합연구, 제11권, 제12호, 2013, 155-160. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2013.11.12.155
  16. 서정호, "오픈API 활성화를 통한 국내 은행산업의 혁신전략", 한국금융연구원 VIP리포트, 2018-08, 54-55.
  17. 송지준, SPSS/AMOS 통계분석방법, 21세기사, 2010.
  18. 우종필, 구조방정식 모델 개념과 이해, 한나래 출판사, 2012.
  19. 이홍제, 노은희, 한경석, "정보보호 투자의도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 연구", 한국디지털콘텐츠학회논문지, 제19권, 제8호, 2018, 1515-1525.
  20. Chenoweth, T., R. Minch, and S. Tabor, "Expanding views of technology acceptance: seeking factors explaining security control adoption", AMCIS 2007 Proceedings, 2007, 321.
  21. Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi, and P.R. Warahaw, "User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models", Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 8, 1989, 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  22. Floyd, D.L., Prentice-Dunn, S., and Rogers, R. W., "A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol.30, No.2, 2000, 407-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02323.x
  23. Fornell, C. and D.F. Larcker, "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error", Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.18, No1, 1981.
  24. Johnston, A.C. and M. Warkentin, "Fear appeals and information security behaviors: An empirical study", MIS Quarterly, Vol.34, No.1, 2010, 549-566. https://doi.org/10.2307/25750691
  25. Pavlou, P., "Integrating trust in electronic commerce with the technology acceptance model: Model development and validation", AMCIS 2001 Proceedings, 2001.
  26. Rogers, R.W., "A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change", The Journal of Psychology, Vol.91, No.1, 1975, 93-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803
  27. Rogers, R.W., "Cognitive and psychological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation", Social Psychophysiology: A Sourcebook, 1983, 153-176.
  28. Venkatesh, V. and F.D. Davis, "A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies", Management Science, Vol.46, No.2, 2000, 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  29. Venkatesh, V. and H. Bala, "Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions", Decision Science, Vol.39, No.2, 2008, 273-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
  30. Venkatesh, V., J.Y.L. Thong, and X. Xu, "Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology", MIS Quarterly, Vol 36, No 1. 2012, 157-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
  31. Woon, I., G.-W. Tan, and R. Low, "A protection motivation theory approach to home wireless security", ICIS 2005 Proceedings, 2005, 31.