DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Choice Stepping Reaction Time under Unstable Conditions in Healthy Young and Older Adults: A Reliability and Comparison Study

  • Lim, Ji Young (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Konyang University) ;
  • Lee, Seong Joo (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Konyang University) ;
  • Park, Dae-Sung (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Science, Konyang University)
  • 투고 : 2021.11.16
  • 심사 : 2021.12.27
  • 발행 : 2021.12.31

초록

Purpose: We aimed to analyze the reliability of the test for choice stepping reaction time (CSRT) under an unstable surface and determine whether there were differences in CSRT between support surface conditions (stable vs. unstable conditions) and between age groups (young adults vs. community-dwelling older adults). Methods: Twenty healthy community-dwelling older adults and twenty young adults performed the stepping task under an unstable condition over two visits. The mean of the two trials measured for each visit was used for the analysis. The test-retest reliability was analyzed using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval, standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC). Differences in CSRT between support surface conditions and age groups were analyzed using the independent t-test with Bonferroni correction. Results: Excellent consistency was observed for ICC >0.90 in both groups. Moreover, the SEM and MDC values of the CSRT in older and young adults were 0.03 and 0.09 and 0.01 and 0.04, respectively. There was a significant difference in the CSRT between the age groups under stable (p<0.001) and unstable conditions (p<0.001). Conclusion: The findings demonstrated that the test for CSRT under an unstable condition had reliable results in both groups. Although older adults demonstrated longer reaction times than younger adults in all surface conditions, increasing the balance control demand by implementing a choice stepping task concomitant with a balance task had no influence on the reaction time in both age groups.

키워드

과제정보

This research was supported by an R&D grant (No. P0003035) on the fusion and convergence of promoting regional industries by the Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology, Ministry of SMEs and Startups.

참고문헌

  1. Burns ER, Stevens JA, Lee R. The direct costs of fatal and non-fatal falls among older adults-United States. J Saf Res. 2016;58:99-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2016.05.001
  2. Murphy J, Isaacs B. The post-fall syndrome. Gerontology. 1982;28(4): 265-70. https://doi.org/10.1159/000212543
  3. Gillespie LD, Gillespie WJ, Robertson MC et al. Interventions for preventing falls in elderly people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(4): CD000340.
  4. Lord SR, Fitzpatrick RC. Choice stepping reaction time: a composite measure of falls risk in older people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(10):M627-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/56.10.M627
  5. Carlson MC, Fried LP, Xue QL et al. Association between executive attention and physical functional performance in community-dwelling older women. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1999;54(5):S262-S70. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/54B.5.S262
  6. Tabbarah M, Crimmins EM, Seeman TE. The relationship between cognitive and physical performance: macarthur studies of successful aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57(4):M228-35. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/57.4.M228
  7. van Iersel MB, Ribbers H, Munneke M et al. The effect of cognitive dual tasks on balance during walking in physically fit elderly people. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(2):187-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.031
  8. de Boer MR, Pluijm SM, Lips P et al. Different aspects of visual impairment as risk factors for falls and fractures in older men and women. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19(9):1539-47. https://doi.org/10.1359/JBMR.040504
  9. De Rekeneire N, Visser M, Peila R et al. Is a fall just a fall: correlates of falling in healthy older persons. the health, aging and body composition study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(6):841-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.51267.x
  10. Moreland JD, Richardson JA, Goldsmith CH et al. Muscle weakness and falls in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(7):1121-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52310.x
  11. Morris R. Predicting falls in older women. Menopause Int. 2007;13(4):170-7. https://doi.org/10.1258/175404507783004131
  12. Condron JE, Hill KD. Reliability and validity of a dual-task force platform assessment of balance performance: effect of age, balance impairment, and cognitive task. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(1):157-62. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50022.x
  13. Hauer K, Pfisterer M, Weber C et al. Cognitive impairment decreases postural control during dual tasks in geriatric patients with a history of severe falls. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(11):1638-44. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51517.x
  14. Pijnappels M, Delbaere K, Sturnieks DL et al. The association between choice stepping reaction time and falls in older adults-a path analysis model. Age Ageing. 2010;39(1):99-104. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afp200
  15. Okubo Y, Schoene D, Lord SR. Step training improves reaction time, gait and balance and reduces falls in older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(7):586-93. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-095452
  16. Martinez-Amat A, Hita-Contreras F, Lomas-Vega R et al. Effects of 12-week proprioception training program on postural stability, gait, and balance in older adults: a controlled clinical trial. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(8):2180-8. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0b013e31827da35f
  17. Ogaya S, Ikezoe T, Soda N et al. Effects of balance training using wobble boards in the elderly. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(9):2616-22. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0b013e31820019cf
  18. Van Criekinge T, Saeys W, Vereeck L et al. Are unstable support surfaces superior to stable support surfaces during trunk rehabilitation after stroke? a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(17):1981-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1323030
  19. Morat M, Bakker J, Hammes V et al. Effects of stepping exergames under stable versus unstable conditions on balance and strength in healthy community-dwelling older adults: A three-armed randomized controlled trial. Exp Gerontol. 2019;127:110719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2019.110719
  20. Melzer I, Oddsson LI. The effect of a cognitive task on voluntary step execution in healthy elderly and young individuals. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(8):1255-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52353.x
  21. Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A. Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture. 2002;16 (1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00156-4
  22. Tijsma M, Vister E, Hoang P et al. A simple test of choice stepping reaction time for assessing fall risk in people with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(6):601-7. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2016.1148784
  23. Caetano MJD, Lord SR, Allen NE et al. Stepping reaction time and gait adaptability are significantly impaired in people with Parkinson's disease: implications for fall risk. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018;47:32-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.11.340
  24. Menant J, Goldstein D, Au K et al. Evidence of slow and variable choice-stepping reaction time in cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Gait Posture. 2021;89:178-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.07.010
  25. Desai A, Goodman V, Kapadia N et al. Relationship between dynamic balance measures and functional performance in community-dwelling elderly people. Phys Ther. 2010;90(5):748-60. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20090100
  26. Mathurapongsakul P, Siriphorn A. Four square step test with foam is more accurate than those without foam for discriminating between older adults with and without fall history. J Aging Phys Act. 2018;26(4):624-8. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2017-0363
  27. Ricci NA, de Faria Figueiredo Goncalves D, Coimbra AMV et al. Sensory interaction on static balance: a comparison concerning the history of falls of community-dwelling elderly. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2009;9(2):165-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0594.2009.00516.x
  28. Ejupi A, Brodie M, Gschwind YJ et al. Kinect-based five-times-sit-to-stand test for clinical and in-home assessment of fall risk in older people. Gerontology. 2015;62(1):118-24. https://doi.org/10.1159/000381804
  29. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
  30. Fleiss JL. Design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
  31. Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(1):231-40. https://doi.org/10.1519/15184.1
  32. Bland JM, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327(8476): 307-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
  33. St George RJ, Fitzpatrick RC, Rogers MW et al. Choice stepping response and transfer times: effects of age, fall risk, and secondary tasks. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62(5):537-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/62.5.537
  34. Haggerty S, Jiang LT, Galecki A et al. Effects of biofeedback on secondary-task response time and postural stability in older adults. Gait Posture. 2012;35(4):523-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.10.359
  35. Magnard J, Berrut G, Couturier C et al. Perceptual inhibition is not a specific component of the sensory integration process necessary for a rapid voluntary step initiation in healthy older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020;75(9):1921-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbz060
  36. Lord SR, Matters B, St George R et al. The effects of water exercise on physical functioning in older people. Australas J Ageing. 2006;25(1):36-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6612.2006.00138.x
  37. Beckerman H, Roebroeck M, Lankhorst G et al. Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res. 2001; 10(7):571-8. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013138911638