Nutrition Research and Practice

The Korean Nutrition Society (한국영양학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of a restaurant hygienic grade certificate program on consumer choices

  • Kim, Jae-il (Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Choi, Jinkyung (Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Pukyong National University)
  • Received : 2021.04.01
  • Accepted : 2021.06.21
  • Published : 2021.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The recent coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has brought to light issues regarding personal and environmental cleanliness. Individuals may have concerns about cleanliness at food service establishments when they consume food prepared at a restaurant. In Korea, a new restaurant hygienic certificate system was implemented in 2017. The effect of this new system has not been evaluated. SUBJECTS/METHODS: This study investigated consumers' perceptions of these new certificates using the protection motivation theory (PMT). An online survey was conducted to collect data and then exploratory factor analysis, analysis of variance, and multiple regression tests were run. RESULTS: The results of this study indicate that 3 different certificates had significant differences in threat (P < 0.001) and benefit (P < 0.001) perception. However, experience with a foodborne illness from a restaurant did not effect on the PMT variables. In addition, the 3-tier certificate did not motivate consumers to protect themselves against foodborne illnesses, while previous experiences of foodborne illness (P < 0.05), coping (P < 0.001), and benefits (P < 0.01) affected this protection motivation. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that consumers were not influenced by different certificate levels regarding their motivation to protect themselves from foodborne illnesses. Therefore, an improved plan should be initiated to clarify the meaning of these certificates. The results of this study can help the application and development of a new system for future adaptations.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Pukyong National University Research Abroad Fund in 2017 (C-D-2017-0973).

References

  1. Nyarugwe SP, Linnemann A, Hofstede GJ, Fogliano V, Luning PA. Determinants for conducting food safety culture research. Trends Food Sci Technol 2016;56:77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2016.07.015
  2. Michaels B, Keller C, Blevins M, Paoli G, Ruthman T, Todd E, Griffith CJ. Prevention of food worker transmission of foodborne pathogens: risk assessment and evaluation of effective hygiene intervention strategies. Food Serv Technol 2004;4:31-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-5740.2004.00088.x
  3. Griffith C. Chapter 20. Advances in understanding the impact of personal hygiene and human behaviour on food safety. In: Sofos J, editor. Advances in Microbial Food Safety. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing; 2013. p.401-16.
  4. World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020 [cited 2021 May 7]. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public.
  5. CNN. Restaurants struggle to survive as coronavirus turns Seattle into a ghost town [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): CNN; 2020 [cited 2021 May 7]. Available from: https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/10/us/seattlerestaurants-customer-decrease-trnd/index.html.
  6. Reuters. Coronavirus brings no-contact food delivery to United States [Internet]. London: Reuters; 2020 [cited 2021 May 7]. Available from: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-delivery/coronavirus-brings-no-contact-food-delivery-to-united-states-idUSKBN20X2Q2.
  7. Arirang News. COVID-19 outbreak has rocked profits, sales of restaurant owners in S. Korea: report [Internet]. Seoul: Arirang News; 2020 [cited 2021 April 20]. Available from: http://www.arirang.co.kr/News/News_View.asp?nseq=263594.
  8. Rogers RW. A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. J Psychol 1975;91:93-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803
  9. Fry RB, Prentice-Dunn S. Effects of a psychosocial intervention on breast self-examination attitudes and behaviors. Health Educ Res 2006;21:287-95. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyh066
  10. McMath BF, Prentice-Dunn S. Protection motivation theory and skin cancer risk: the role of individual differences in responses to persuasive appeals. J Appl Soc Psychol 2005;35:621-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02138.x
  11. Grindley EJ, Zizzi SJ, Nasypany AM. Use of protection motivation theory, affect, and barriers to understand and predict adherence to outpatient rehabilitation. Phys Ther 2008;88:1529-40. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20070076
  12. Abraham CS, Sheeran P, Abrams D, Spears R. Exploring teenagers' adaptive and maladaptive thinking in relation to the threat of HIV infection. Psychol Health 1994;9:253-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449408407485
  13. Korea Agency of HACCP Accreditation and Services. Introduction to restaurant hygiene grade certificate [Internet]. Cheongju: Korea Agency of HACCP Accreditation and Services; 2018 [cited 2020 October 20]. Available from: https://www.haccp.or.kr/site/haccp/sub.do?key=2405.
  14. Food Standards Agency. Scores on the doors [Internet]. London: Food Standards Agency; 2008 [cited 2020 October 20]. Available from: http://www.food. gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/board/fsa080306.pdf.
  15. Bai L, Wang M, Yang Y, Gong S. Food safety in restaurants: the consumer perspective. Int J Hospit Manag 2019;77:139-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.06.023
  16. Milne S, Sheeran P, Orbell S. Prediction and intervention in health-related behavior: a meta-analytic review of protection motivation theory. J Appl Soc Psychol 2000;30:106-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02308.x
  17. Choi J, Nelson D, Almanza B. Food safety risk for restaurant management: use of restaurant health inspection report to predict consumers' behavioral intention. J Risk Res 2019;22:1443-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1501590
  18. Lim JU, Lee JH, Kim JS, Hwang YI, Kim TH, Lim SY, Yoo KH, Jung KS, Kim YK, Rhee CK. Comparison of World Health Organization and Asia-Pacific body mass index classifications in COPD patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2017;12:2465-75. https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S141295
  19. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. New York (NY): McGraw Hill; 1978.
  20. Yoon E, Shanklin CW. Food security practice in Kansas schools and health care facilities. J Am Diet Assoc 2007;107:325-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2006.11.016
  21. Jing M, Jooho K, Almanza B. Restaurant manager perceptions of the Food and Drug Administration's newest recommended food facility inspection format: training and words matter. J Environ Health 2019;81:8-14.
  22. Bettman JR, Zins MA. Information format and choice task effects in decision making. J Consum Res 1979;6:141-53. https://doi.org/10.1086/208757