References
- Bachhal V, Saini G, Jindal N, Sament R, Dadra A : GeoGebra: a reliable and free software for measuring acetabular cup anteversion on digitalized plain radiographs. J Clin Orthop Trauma 11(Suppl 2) : S201-S205, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.02.001
- Cho SK, Kim JS, Overley SC, Merrill RK : Cervical laminoplasty: indications, surgical considerations, and clinical outcomes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 26 : e142-e152, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-16-00242
- De Felice E, Pacioni C, Tardella FM, Dall'Aglio C, Palladino A, Scocco P : A novel method for increasing the numerousness of biometrical parameters useful for wildlife management: roe deer mandible as bone model. Animals (Basel) 10 : 465, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030465
- Deol GS : Comparison of spinal canal expansion between two techniques of cervical laminoplasty. 31st Annual Meeting of Cervical Spine Research Society; 2003 Dec 11-13; Scottsdale, AZ
- GeoGebra : GeoGebra software. Available at: https://www.geogebra.org/
- Gu Z, Zhang A, Shen Y, Li F, Sun X, Ding W : Relationship between the laminoplasty opening size and the laminoplasty opening angle, increased sagittal canal diameter and the prediction of spinal canal expansion following open-door cervical laminoplasty. Eur Spine J 24 : 1613-1620, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3779-3
- Gu ZF, Zhang AL, Shen Y, Ding WY, Li F, Sun XZ : The relationship between laminoplasty opening angle and increased sagittal canal diameter and the prediction of spinal canal expansion following double-door cervical laminoplasty. Eur Spine J 24 : 1597-1604, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3387-7
- Hamburger C, Büttner A, Uhl E : The cross-sectional area of the cervical spinal canal in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Correlation of preoperative and postoperative area with clinical symptoms. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22 : 1990-1994; discussion 1995, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199709010-00009
- Hatta Y, Shiraishi T, Hase H, Yato Y, Ueda S, Mikami Y, et al. : Is posterior spinal cord shifting by extensive posterior decompression clinically significant for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 : 2414-2419, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000184751.80857.3e
- Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Suzuki N, Satomi K, Ishii Y : Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 8 : 693-699, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198310000-00003
- Imagama S, Matsuyama Y, Yukawa Y, Kawakami N, Kamiya M, Kanemura T, et al. : C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty: a multicentre study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 : 393-400, 2010
- Jovanov D, Vujic B, Vujic G : Optimization of the monitoring of landfill gas and leachate in closed methanogenic landfills. J Environ Manage 216 : 32-40, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.08.039
- Kohno K, Kumon Y, Oka Y, Matsui S, Ohue S, Sakaki S : Evaluation of prognostic factors following expansive laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol 48 : 237-245, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-3019(97)00166-3
- Naito M, Ogata K, Kurose S, Oyama M : Canal-expansive laminoplasty in 83 patients with cervical myelopathy. A comparative study of three different procedures. Int Orthop 18 : 347-351, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187078
- Nakashima H, Kato F, Yukawa Y, Imagama S, Ito K, Machino M, et al. : Comparative effectiveness of open-door laminoplasty versus Frenchdoor laminoplasty in cervical compressive myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39 : 642-647, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000252
- Pantazi A, Doukakis S : An educational scenario for the learning of the conic section: studying the ellipse with the use of digital tools and elements of differentiated instruction and cognitive neurosciences. Adv Exp Med Biol 1194 : 31-40, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32622-7_3
- Park JH, Roh SW, Rhim SC, Jeon SR : Long-term outcomes of 2 cervical laminoplasty methods: midline splitting versus unilateral single door. J Spinal Disord Tech 25 : E224-E229, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e31825dda6b
- Velazquez-Galvan Y, Encinas A : Analytical magnetostatic model for 2D arrays of interacting magnetic nanowires and nanotubes. Phys Chem Chem Phys 22 : 13320-13328, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CP00808G
- Wang XY, Dai LY, Xu HZ, Chi YL : Prediction of spinal canal expansion following cervical laminoplasty: a computer-simulated comparison between single and double-door techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31 : 2863-2870, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000245851.55012.f1
- Yang XJ, Tian RJ, Su X, Hu SB, Lei W, Zhang Y : Relationship of actual laminoplasty opening size and increment of the cross-sectional area based on single-door cervical laminoplasy. Medicine (Baltimore) 97 : e0216, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000010216
- Yoon ST, Raich A, Hashimoto RE, Riew KD, Shaffrey CI, Rhee JM, et al. : Predictive factors affecting outcome after cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(22 Suppl 1) : S232-S252, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7eb55
- Yue WM, Tan CT, Tan SB, Tan SK, Tay BK : Results of cervical laminoplasty and a comparison between single and double trap-door techniques. J Spinal Disord 13 : 329-335, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-200008000-00010