Architectural research

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

TOPSIS-Based Decision-Making Model for Demolition Method Selection

  • Lee, Hyung Yong (Department of Architectural Engineering, Dankook University) ;
  • Cho, Jae Ho (Department of Architectural Engineering, Dankook University) ;
  • Son, Bo Sik (Department of Architectural Engineering, Namseoul University) ;
  • Chae, Myung Jin (Construction Management, Central Connecticut State University) ;
  • Lim, Nam Gi (Department of Architectural Engineering, Tongmyong University) ;
  • Chun, Jae Youl (Department of Architectural Engineering, Dankook University)
  • Received : 2021.11.10
  • Accepted : 2021.12.21
  • Published : 2021.12.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

An efficient demolition process requires the optimum method selection considering stability, economic feasibility, environment, and workability. In reality the construction cost and period are priority concerns, and safe construction methods are neglected. In addition, the choosing demolition method is often determined subjectively by experienced field engineers. This research paper presents a multi-criteria decision-making method using Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to select the optimum demolition method. Three experienced demolition engineers' opinions were used to develop the TOPSIS model. The case study showed that the preferences of ten attribute measurements for demolition method selection. Authors suggested the most preferable demolition method for the case study project.

Keywords

References

  1. Assari, A., Mahesh, T., & Assari, E. (2012). "Role of public participation in sustainability of historical city: usage of TOPSIS method", Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(3), 2289-2294
  2. Choi, J.S., Kim, G.H., & Cha, H.J. (2007). "Measures to improve the safety education system for building dismantling works", Korean Society of Safety and Security, pp.57-64.
  3. Choi, S.S., Go, W.J., Huh, S.T., & Lee, H.M. (2010). "A Study of Safety Management Appraisal Standard in Building Demolition Work", Proceedings of the conference Korea Construction Management Association, 2010 November pp.65-69.
  4. Chun, J.Y., Cho, J.H., Kim, H.S., & Chae, M.J. (2019). "A study on the management system improvement plan to strengthen the professionalism of the dismantling work", Yongin (Korea): Dankook University BIG MV Book, pp 81-83
  5. Data from the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, (2017). Green Architecture Division press release "National Building Status"
  6. Ha, G.J., & Ha, J.H. (2013). "A Study on the Introduction of National Technical Qualification Testing System for Activating Demolition Industry in Korea", Journal of the Korean Institute of Architects and Engineers, 15(3), 119-126.
  7. Hong EH. (2014). "A study on performance assessment information system for building remodeling", dissertation. Yongin (Korea), Dankook University. p. 6-20.
  8. Hwang, C.L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, New York: Springer-Verlag.
  9. Hwang, C.L., Lai, Y.J., & Liu, T.Y. (1993). "A new approach for multiple objective decision making" Computers and Operational Research, 20 (8): 889-899. doi:10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-v.
  10. Hong, Y.T., Yu, J.H., Lim, G.H., & Lee, H.S. (2004). "Evaluation of Time-Affecting Factors in High-Rise Building Construction Using FMEA", Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea. 20(10), 92-173.
  11. Kim, B.S., Kim, T.H., & Park, C.S. (2002). "A Selection Model of Demolition Method considering the Characteristics of Remodeling Project", Proceeding of Annual Conference of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 22(2), 443-445
  12. Kim, G.J. (2016). "An Evaluation Model of User-oriented Preference Analysis based on QFD-TOPSIS for Design Alternative Selection of Apartment Housing Remodeling", Ph. D Thesis, Dankook University, Department of Architectural Engineering, pp. 33-37
  13. Kim, G.J. (2016). "An Evaluation Model of User-oriented Preference Analysis based on QFD-TOPSIS for Design Alternative Selection of Apartment Housing Remodeling", Ph. D. Thesis, Dankook University, Department of Architectural Engineering, pp. 62-76
  14. Kim, H.H., & Lee, G. (2007). "A Quantitative Analysis of Fatal Accidents Related to Cranes Using the FMEA Method", Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. (3):115-122. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2007.7.3.115
  15. Kim, K.H., Choi, J.S., Shin, S.H., & Yang, C.H. (2008). "Analysis of the Risk Factors in Demolition", Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 24(1), 154
  16. Lee, H.M., & Go, S.S. (2007). "A Study on the System Development for Optimum Method Selection in Demolition Works", Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 24(5)193-200.
  17. Lim, J.M., Kim, J.H., & Kim, J.J. (2011). "A Preliminary Study on the Necessity of Safety Management System during the Demolition Work", Proceedings of the Fall Conference of the Korean Institute of Architects, 32 (2), pp.389-390.
  18. Min, B.R., Ha, G.J., Yoon, S.j., & Yoon, K.K. (1988). A Comparative study on demolition methods in the buildings, Korea Institute of Construction Technology. pp. 120-150
  19. Ministry of Employment and Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Agency (2021). Safety Work Procedures for Dismantling Construction.
  20. Park, H.T., & Choe, B.C. (1996). A Study on the Demolition Method of Structure (I), Land and Housing.
  21. Yang, J.K., & Kim, S.Y. (2005). Improvement and Systematization of Pre-Study Work for Design Value Engineering in Construction Projects by Quality Function Deployment, Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management, Seoul, Korea
  22. Yoon, K. (1987). "A Reconciliation Among Discrete Compromise Situations", Journal of the Operational Research Society, 38 (3), pp. 277-286 https://doi.org/10.2307/2581948
  23. Yu, J.H., Song, J.W., & Kim, C.D. (2008). "Construction Safety Management Using FMEA Technique for Selecting Priority order.", Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. Dec;9(6), 185-93.